The style of handling conflict that involves a high degree of concern for both parties is

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The style of handling conflict that involves a high degree of concern for both parties is "Collaboration".


The collaborating style, sometimes called as a 'win/win' strategy, endeavors to ensure that the two sides are fulfilled. It requires an open talk of the considerable number of issues and concerns, investigation of elective arrangements, and genuineness and duty from every one of the gatherings. To be fruitful, the collaborating style members should have the capacity to surface worries in a non-undermining way and think creatively.

Related Questions

PLEASE HURRY! TIME LIMIT!How did states believe that belonging to the Confederacy would affect their power?They feared they would have less power than the national government.They thought they would have the same amount of power as the national government.They thought they would retain more power than the national government. They feared they would give up all power to the national government.What was the outcome of North Carolina’s first vote on secession? The vote was inconclusive.The people voted to secede only if Lincoln was elected president. The people voted not to secede from the Union. The people voted to secede immediately.
Why Did The Civil Rights Movement Fall Apart In The Late 1960s And Early 1970s? Was The Movement A Success?
There are twenty-eight teams in the NFL. a. True b. False
A typical housing lease may require a tenant to?
A researcher finds a that people who own more than two cars have bigger homes, more garage space and make more money than people who own one or two cars. Her inference that having more than two cars causes people to have homes with bigger garages is lacking which type of causal evidence? 1. economic instability 2. temporal precedence 3. covariation of cause and effect 4. elimination of alternative explanations

In what ways do appeals and arguments align with feelings and thinking? Group of answer choices Appeals inspire feelings: arguments inspire thinking. Appeals inspire thinking: arguments inspire feelings. Feelings inspire appeals; thinking inspires arguments. Feelings inspire arguments; thinking inspires appeals.

Answers

Answer:

Appeals inspire feelings, arguments inspire thinking

Explanation:

Appeals can be explained or described simply as a process or a way of correcting errors. This involves the process of addressing a doing or an act which an individual does not like. This is usually done in a polite manner.

Argument can be explained as a situation of showing reasons of supporting or coming against a particular decision or an idea.

In this case, Appeal usually inspire the feelings, that is , it is done most times based on the feelings an individual has towards the thing, or person, while argument inspire thinking. This is because , you have to set of points and be able to present them convincinly as to why you are against or in support of an idea or decision.

In a command economy, the government provides everything EXCEPT:a. jobs
b. food
c. subsidies
d. 6 care

Answers

B. Food.  Everything else is provided by the State.  The government makes the decisions and people are paid just enough for their needs.  The economy is also subsidized by the government since there is no private ownership in a command economy. Benefits also comes from the government. Food is something people buy with their earnings. 

Its B. but they answered it much better than i would.

What was the last place that humans settled?Why was that the last place to be settled by humans?

Answers

The last major land settled by humans was New Zealand- some estimates say that it was only 750 years ago!

But some pacific (small) islands were settled even later.

The last continent to be settled: Australia

Why did some people oppose the Mormons

Answers

because Mormons are so judgmental when it comes to other peoples beliefs on the way they want to live

but thats really any religion

How did the political parties affect voter turnout when they were stronger?

Answers

Party is strong when their candidates are able to tap into the minds and hearts of the voters.  When they present programs and make them appealing to the public, they are able to strengthen the party and if the people like what they see and here, then more voters will turn out and vote.  

Answer:

Voter turnout was very high." The political parties affect voter turnout when they were stronger by having a Voter turnout that was very high. It is considered an ideal election.

I hope I can help you have a beautiful weekend :)

If you were to travel from Canada to Guatemala in which direction would you travel north south east or west

Answers

Canada is in the north, and Guatemala is in the south. So from Canada, you go south to get to Guatemala.