Scientific inquiries usually begin with the formulation of a question. Can a scientific inquiry be constructed about any question? A. No; the question must be testable or scientifically investigable.

B.
Yes; one universal scientific method can be applied to any question.

C.
No; only questions about supernatural events may be investigated.

D.
Yes; it is possible to investigate any question through scientific inquiry.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

The answer is:

No, the question must be testable or scientifically investigable.

i know i got this right because i went into study island and i got it right.

Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

A.

No; the question must be testable or scientifically investigable.

Explanation:


Related Questions

Explain why solitude is important. What are some different ways to practice solitude
List two disadvantages of living off campus while attending college
Hyperpolarization means that the ________.
Economics: Which relationship BEST illustrates a comparison of absolute advantage and comparative advantage?es )A country with an absolute advantage will always have a comparativeadvantage in producing products.A country with a comparative advantage can produce a greater output of aproducts than a country with an absolute advantage.A country with an absolute advantage can produce a product at a loweropportunity cost than a country with a comparative advantage in producingall productsA country with a comparative advantage can produce a product at a loweropportunity cost, even if another country has an absolute advantage in theproduction of all goods.
How are the accounts of Mali and Mogadishu similar and different

Wind speeds increase higher up from the Earth's surface becauseA. friction from landscape features doesn't slow them down.
B. oxygen levels are decreased, making air movement quicker.
C. the atmosphere is composed of heavier molecules at lower atmospheric levels.
D. the wind is augmented by the solar wind.

Answers

A. Friction from the landscape doesn't slow them down. as altitude increases, there wind speed increases primarily due to less friction slowing down the wind. Earth's terrain by its very nature provides friction which slows the wind down. Buildings, tress, hills, etc all slow the wind. The higher up you go, there is less things to impede the wind and provide any friction. The wind speeds are therefore higher at the high altitudes.

A. friction from landscape features doesn't slow them down.

I just took the TEST and made a 100%, It was right.

When making a turn, you must signal continuously for at least __________ before reaching the intersection.A. 50 ft

B. 100 ft

C. 150 ft

D. 200 ft

Answers

When making a turn, you must signal continuously for at least 100 ft before reaching the intersection.

Need help on Phyllis Schlafly and her role in the ERA movement.

Answers

Schlafly became an outspoken opponent of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) during the 1970s as the organizer of the "STOP ERA" campaign. STOP was an acronym for "Stop Taking Our Privileges". She argued that the ERA would take away gender-specific privileges currently enjoyed by women, including "dependent wife" benefits under Social Security, separate restrooms for males and females, and exemption from the Selective Service (the Army draft).[21][22] She was opposed by groups such as the National Organization for Women (NOW) and the ERAmerica coalition. The Homemakers' Equal Rights Association was formed to counter Schlafly's campaign.[citation needed]

In 1972, when Schlafly began her campaign against the Equal Rights Amendment, it had already been ratified by 28 of the required 38 states.[citation needed] Seven more states ratified the amendment after Schlafly began organizing opposition, but another five states rescinded their ratifications. The last state to ratify the ERA was Indiana, where State Senator Wayne Townsend cast the tie-breaking vote in January 1977.[citation needed]

The Equal Rights Amendment was narrowly defeated, having only achieved ratification in 35 states, five of which had subsequently rescinded their ratification.[8] Experts agree Schlafly was a key player. Political scientist Jane J. Mansbridge concluded in her history of the ERA:

Many people who followed the struggle over the ERA believed—rightly in my view—that the Amendment would have been ratified by 1975 or 1976 had it not been for Phyllis Schlafly's early and effective effort to organize potential opponents.[23]

Joan Williams argues, "ERA was defeated when Schlafly turned it into a war among women over gender roles."[24] Historian Judith Glazer-Raymo argues:

As moderates, we thought we represented the forces of reason and goodwill but failed to take seriously the power of the family values argument and the single-mindedness of Schlafly and her followers. The ERA's defeat seriously damaged the women's movement, destroying its momentum and its potential to foment social change ... Eventually, this resulted in feminist dissatisfaction with the Republican Party, giving the Democrats a new source of strength that when combined with overwhelming minority support, helped elect Bill Clinton to the presidency in 1992 and again in 1996.[25]

Critics of Schlafly saw her advocacy against equal rights and her role as a working professional as a contradiction. Gloria Steinem and author Pia de Solenni, among others, considered it ironic that in Schlafly's role as an advocate for the full-time mother and wife, she herself was a lawyer, newsletter editor, touring speaker, and political activist.[18][26]

Like other tyrannies, the tyranny of the majority was at first, and is still vulgarly, held in dread, chiefly as operating through the acts of the public authorities. But reflecting persons perceived that when society is itself the tyrant—society collectively over the separate individuals who compose it—its means of tyrannising are not restricted to the acts which it may do by the hands of its political functionaries. Society can and does execute its own mandates; and if it issues wrong mandates instead of right, or any mandates at all in things with which it ought not to meddle, it practises a social tyranny more formidable than many kinds of political oppression, since, though not usually upheld by such extreme penalties, it leaves fewer means of escape, penetrating much more deeply into the details of life, and enslaving the soul itself. Protection, therefore, against the tyranny of the magistrate1 is not enough; there needs protection also against the tyranny of the prevailing opinion and feeling, against the tendency of society to impose, by other means than civil penalties, its own ideas and practices as rules of conduct on those who dissent from them; to fetter the development and, if possible, prevent the formation of any individuality not in harmony with its ways, and compel all characters to fashion themselves upon the model of its own. There is a limit to the legitimate interference of collective opinion with individual independence; and to find that limit, and maintain it against encroachment, is as indispensable to a good condition of human affairs as protection against political despotism.2But though this proposition is not likely to be contested in general terms, the practical question, where to place the limit—how to make the fitting adjustment between individual independence and social control—is a subject on which nearly everything remains to be done.All that makes existence valuable to anyone depends on the enforcement of restraints upon the actions of other people. Some rules of conduct, therefore, must be imposed—by law in the first place, and by opinion on many things which are not fit subjects for the operation of law. What these rules should be is the principal question in human affairs; but if we except a few of the most obvious cases, it is one of those which least progress has been made in resolving. No two ages, and scarcely any two countries, have decided it alike; and the decision of one age or country is a wonder to another. Yet the people of any given age and country no more suspect any difficulty in it than if it were a subject on which mankind had always been agreed. The rules which obtain among themselves appear to them self-evident and self-justifying. This all but universal illusion is one of the examples of the magical influence of custom, which is not only, as the proverb says, a second nature, but is continually mistaken for the first. The effect of custom, in preventing any misgiving respecting the rules of conduct which mankind impose on one another, is all the more complete because the subject is one on which it is not generally considered necessary that reasons should be given, either by one person to others, or by each to himself. People are accustomed to believe, and have been encouraged in the belief by some who aspire to the character of philosophers, that their feelings on subjects of this nature are better than reasons and render reasons unnecessary. The practical principle which guides them to their opinions on the regulation of human conduct is the feeling in each person’s mind that everybody should be required to act as he, and those with whom he sympathises, would like them to act.

Which of the following quotations best represents the thesis statement of the passage?

A)“But reflecting persons perceived that when society is itself the tyrant—society collectively over the separate individuals who compose it—its means of tyrannising are not restricted to the acts which it may do by the hands of its political functionaries.” (paragraph 1, sentence 2)


B)“Protection, therefore, against the tyranny of the magistrate is not enough; there needs protection also against the tyranny of the prevailing opinion and feeling . . . .” (paragraph 1, sentence 4)

C)“But though this proposition is not likely to be contested in general terms, the practical question, where to place the limit—how to make the fitting adjustment between individual independence and social control—is a subject on which nearly everything remains to be done.” (paragraph 2, sentence 1)


D)“All that makes existence valuable to anyone depends on the enforcement of restraints upon the actions of other people.” (paragraph 2, sentence 2)


E)“No two ages, and scarcely any two countries, have decided it alike; and the decision of one age or country is a wonder to another.” (paragraph 2, sentence 5)

Answers

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Why do words hurt so much???? What is it that makes us react to :"positive" and "negative" words.

Answers

it all comes from our unconsciousness and knowns what are good words and bad words so when some one said something men to you.... your brain knows exactly what that means and give signals to the brain ( consciousness) and tells where it's a good thing or bad thing and or maybe you are very sencetive

Answer:

brainliest

Explanation:

What do you think when you see this image? What do you think it represents?

Answers

i personally see a desert with foot steps that left i think it would represent lonleyness or the act of abandoning something perhaps what used to be a city

Answer:

it means abandoning

Explanation:

he/she left the cart behind