O extended slavery.
O freed enslaved people.
O united the thirteen states.
O encouraged settlement.
Answer:
................
Explanation:
The Land Ordinance of 1785 was adopted by the United States Congress of the Confederation on May 20, 1785. It set up a standardized system whereby settlers could purchase title to farmland in the undeveloped west. Congress at the time did not have the power to raise revenue by direct taxation, so land sales provided an important revenue stream. The Ordinance set up a survey system that eventually covered over 3/4 of the area of the continental United States.
The earlier Ordinance of 1784 was a resolution written by Thomas Jefferson calling for Congress to take action. The land west of the Appalachian Mountains, north of the Ohio River, and east of the Mississippi River was to be divided into ten separate states. However, the 1784 resolution did not define the mechanism by which the land would become states, or how the territories would be governed or settled before they became states. The Ordinance of 1785 put the 1784 resolution in operation by providing a mechanism for selling and settling the land, while the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 addressed political needs.
Balancing federal and state powers presents a problem due to differences in public viewpoints across states, lack of explicit operating procedures outlined by the Constitution, economic disparities among states, race-to-the-bottom dynamics, difficulty addressing national issues uniformly, and challenges maintaining party unity due to a complex separation of powers.
Balancing federal and state powers can present a problem due to the constantly shifting dynamics between centralized and decentralized governance. For one, the diversity of public viewpoints across states can lead to varied approaches in tackling different policy issues, which may result in inconsistencies and disparities across different regions. Some examples include matters like access to abortion, gun control, and social welfare benefits, which may be approached differently from state to state.
Another factor contributing to the complexity of balancing state and federal powers is the lack of precise operating procedures defined by the Constitution. This frequently mounts responsibility on officials at both state and national levels to interpret the Constitution's design and adjust accordingly, resulting in constant changes in the configuration of federalism over time.
Furthermore, economic disparities across states, competition among states to attract business by lowering taxes and regulations, or 'race-to-the-bottom dynamics', and the difficulty of uniformly addressing issues of national importance are some downsides associated with federalism.
#SPJ3
Answer:
: Is the spreading an ideas or products from one culture to another. Some of the ways that this contact happens are war, trade, and exploration
:
One Positive affect of cultural diffusion is that when new ideas or technology is shared with other cultures. The cultures can then take the idea and use it themselves.
Throughout history we can see that Cultural Diffusion had a great impact. To help give an example to the one positive affect, I will explain it.
The Romans and the Greeks shared some cultural things such as art, columns, and philosophy. Not the same but similar.
Hope this helps you! :)
Answer: Experimenter Bias
Explanation:
Experimenter bias is a phenomenon in research where the researcher influences the behavior of participants and/or the researcher's interpretation of the experimental results. This is because as humans it is almost impossible to be objective due to the feelings and emotions we have about certain thoughts and actions and as a result, these feelings and biases are mirrored into the research thereby reducing the accuracy of said research.
More often than not, this bias is unconscious which makes it even more deadly because it will be harder to detect by the researcher who will then be unable to take countermeasures to mitigate the effects.
Answer:
Jainism was a reaction to Hinduism.
I think that's the answer.
Answer:
reaction to is the answer
Explanation:
Answer:
In norway, the encarceration rate is 75 per 100.000 people, while in the US it is 707 per 100.000. This is almost 10 times more.
In Norway, people stay out. The recidivism rates is 20% (one of the lowest in the world), while in the US 76.6% of the prisioners go back to prison in five years.
Norway base their prison system in "restorative justice", that focus on rehabilitating the prisioner rather than just punishing the crime. The facilities incorporate "cognitive-behavioral programs rooted in social learning theory", and this makes it more efficient keeping people out of jail. The maximum time is 21 years, but if the justice consider the person is not rehabilited they could put 5 more years to their sentence, and that could go on forever.
In the US, on the other hand, people keep being arrested all the time, over 540,000 in pretrial detention, and more than 7.2 million are on probation, being more than 2 million behind bars. The US have life sentences and even death sentences depeding on the calloussness of the crime. It affects the whole society and community. People commited for non-violent crimes remains in jail in jail if they cant afford paying the bail. Another common aspect of prison, the solitaire, makes people unable to live in society in a healthy way.
There are so many things that lead to the over encarceration in the US and to the high rate of recidividism. Providing security, food, health and education for poor societies would be super effective in helping them staying away from crimes. Changing the prison system to a place where people go to actually understand the consequences of their crimes, study, work and go out rehabilited would do much more effects on the whole society.