Answer: rivers provided all the transportation needs of the plantation and farm owners.
Explanation:
Answer: If a higher court agrees to hear it.
An appeal is a resource available when the losing side of a trial has issues with the trial court proceedings, the way the law was applied or which law was applied. On these grounds, litigants have the right to an appellate court review.
There could be several reasons for this appeal. Most often, the claim is that the trial was conducted unfairly, or the law was applied incorrectly. It can also be the case that the law applied violates the state Constitution or the U. S. Constitution.
Answer:
It quickly spread throughout the Middle East and North Africa.
Explanation:
As a result of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), nothing suspects say can be used against them in court unless they are informed about their rights.
Further Explanation:
The decision of the “Miranda versus Arizona” stated that the individuals who are arrested must be notified about their “constitutional rights”, being arrested or questioned. As per the decision, the 5th Amendment act prohibits prosecutors from using suspect speech made at the time of custody and questioning. It is individuals’ legal right to consult an attorney before being interrogated.
The case was considered a drastic change in the “American Criminal law” as it altered the extended the importance of the 5th Amendment. Earlier, it was considered that the act will protect the citizens against the obligation to contempt and confess in the court and after the decision; it became mandatory to inform individuals about their rights. This procedure also referred to as Miranda warning and oral notifications given to the arrestee during custody.
Learn More:
1. in Furman v. Georgia (1972), the supreme court ruled in William Furman’s favor, saying that Georgia had
2. Though the outcomes of the Schenck and New York Times differed, what did these decisions have in common? The government has a heavy burden to prove harm. The government can limit speech that causes harm. The government has unlimited power to limit speech. The government must follow the first amendment.
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Chapter: Miranda versus Arizona
Subject: History
Keywords: Miranda versus Arizona, constitutional rights, amendment, custody, legal right, attorney, criminal law, court