Representatives of interest groups that work to influence Congress are calleda. Republicans.
c. lobbyists.
b. party partisans.
d. Democrats.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The correct answer is letter c. lobbyists. Representatives of interest groups that work to influence Congress are called lobbyists. Lobbyists are get paid to win favor from politicians. They are also activists who seeks to persuade members of the government to enact a certain legislation.

Related Questions

The __________ is the source of the interpersonal communication the person who originates the communication encounter. Loudest speaker Sender Receiver Initiator
Distinguish betwen electronic and print media
Many ancient civilizations believed that dreams were __________.
Who joined Ronald Reagan in taking a firm hand against communism in the eastern bloc
Asexual reproduction is different from sexual reproduction in that the offspring of asexual reproduction

the first amendment includes two clauses relating to the freedom of religion. (a) select one of the following cases and identify the first amendment clause upon which the united states supreme court based its decision. engel v. vitale wisconsin v. yoder (b) describe the supreme court's decision in the case that you selected in (a). (c) select one case from cases - free exercise of religion (d) describe the supreme court's decision in the case that you selected in (c). (e) many of these decisions have caused controversy in the united states. describe two ways in which other political institutions might limit the impact of supreme court decisions and why they may want to do so.the first amendment includes two clauses relating to the freedom of religion. (a) select one of the following cases and identify the first amendment clause upon which the united states supreme court based its decision. engel v. vitale wisconsin v. yoder (b) describe the supreme court's decision in the case that you selected in (a). (c) select one case from cases - free exercise of religion (d) describe the supreme court's decision in the case that you selected in (c). (e) many of these decisions have caused controversy in the united states. describe two ways in which other political institutions might limit the impact of supreme court decisions and why they may want to do so.

Answers

The Supreme Court's judgment in Engel v. Vitale was supported by the first amendment's free speech provision.

What are the two religious freedom clauses? How do they individually work?

The free exercise provision safeguards all citizens' religious convictions and, to some extent, religious practices. The establishment clause, which is more contentious, forbids the government from supporting, encouraging, or meddling excessively in religion and religious activity.

The Free Exercise Clause upholds our freedom to follow our conscience and follow or not follow our beliefs. Additionally, the Establishment Clause forbids the government from siding with one religion over another or favoring or disfavoring anyone based solely on their religious or philosophical beliefs (or lack thereof).

Learn more about the Supreme Court here: brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ1

Going to court to get a particular ruling is called __________.a. litigation
b. lobbying
c. electioneering
d. advocacy

Answers

The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: 'a. litigation.' Going to court to get a particular ruling is called litigation. Litigation is a term of the law that refers to the rules and practices involved in resolving disputes in the court system.

The Republicans controlled the House of Representatives, but not the Senate in 1948. a. True
b. False

Answers

Answer:

The correct answer is B, as the statement is false. The Republicans controlled both the House and the Senate in 1948.

Explanation:

During 1948, the 80th Congress was in office. Its term of office lasted from January 3, 1947, to January 3, 1949. All members of the House of Representatives and one-third of Senators had been elected to the congressional elections in November 1946 and September, respectively, in the State of Maine. This resulted in a majority for the Republican Party in both chambers. However, the Democrats with Harry S. Truman presented the president. Its fair deal policy was largely blocked by the Republican majority in Congress. During the legislature there were some resignations and deaths, but did not change the majority relations. The congress met in the US federal capital Washington, D.C. The United States then consisted of 48 states. The seat distribution in the House of Representatives was based on the 1940 census.

False, the Democrats had the HoR in 1948 as well as the senate, so basically the Democrats had everything. They also had the presidency (Truman) and 8/9 supreme court justices. A good year to be a Democrat.

The insertions of the semispinatus capitus are on the __________. The insertions of the semispinatus capitus are on the __________. spinous process of the cervical vertebrae tendon of the galea aponeuresis zygomatic processes of the temporal bone occipital bone

Answers

Answer:

The insertions of the semispinatus capitus are on the occipital bone.

Explanation:

The semispinatus capitus inserts are mounted on occipital bone.

The semispinalis muscles are a band of 3 transversospinal muscles. The semispinalis capitalis (complex) is located deep to splenius at the top and back of the neck. The tendons are joined together to form a wide muscle that goes upwards and is inserted between both the upper and lower nuchal lines of occipital bone.

On a visit to Russia, you're offered a dessert that combines sweetened cheese with candied fruit and almonds. You're being serveda. falafel.
b. borscht.
c. pashka.
d. relleno.

Answers

C. Pashka
Made in Easter Orthodox Countries
It is an Easter dessert for festivities.

A state’s constitution authorizes a state reapportionment board to redraw state legislative districts every 12 years. During the most recent reapportionment process, consultants had provided the board with two alternative plans for reapportionment. One plan provided for districts with less than a 3% difference in proportional representation between districts. The other plan was drawn up to conform state legislative districts as nearly as possible to county borders, resulting in differences in proportional representation between districts of up to 12%. The current apportionment of legislative districts results in differences of up to 15% between districts. The board ultimately selected the reapportionment plan based on county borders, and this plan was approved by the state legislature.A Caucasian resident and registered voter of the state brought a constitutional challenge to the reapportionment in federal court. His claim is based on the fact that, as a result of the plan that the board selected, the percentage of the African-American voting population in the district in which he lives increased from 45% to 55%. Had the other plan been selected, the percentage would have been unchanged in his district.In the absence of a federal statute applicable to the state, is the resident likely to prevail?

Answers

Answer:

No, because preserving political subdivisions is a legitimate state interest that justifies the plan's variance in representation.

Explanation:

In a similar example, The majority made mention of the State constitutional power of the Virginia General Assembly to pass local legislation associated with specific political subdivisions.

They considered that legislative role to be an essential and substantive feature of the powers and procedures of the Virginia legislature, and therefore justified an effort to preserve political subdivision boundaries in drawing the districts of the House of Delegates.

Its large percentage reached the conclusion that although the consequent overall range between house districts "may well approach tolerable limits, we do not believe it exceeds those limits."