Explanation:
Smartphone was the most innovative and efficient invention of modern times. By the use of smart phones, people can connect and communicate anything at anytime and at anywhere in the world from one corner to the other corner of the world. It is considered a disruptive or unconventional technology where people can easily send and receive information and share knowledge ideas. They can remain in touch with each other at all times.
Answer: D bc it changed hkw and when we connect to others, allowing constant communication
Explanation:
Answer:
c. the constitution needs to be changed to include a bill of rights
Explanation:
An anti-federalist be most likely to agree with the statement that the constitution needs to be changed to include a bill of rights.
Anti-federalist is a movement in the late-18th century that is against the establishment of a stronger United States Federal government and also later go against the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. The former Constitution which is refer to as the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union bestowed so much authority on the state government which was head by Patrick Henry of Virginia during the time.
The Anti-federalist were concerned that the position of President might leads to monarchy even though the Constitution at the time was ratified, Anti-federalist made possible the passage of the United States Bill of Rights.
Answer: The answer is C.
Explanation: An anti-federalist be most likely to agree with the statement that the constitution needs to be changed to include a bill of rights.
Anti-federalist is a movement in the late-18th century that is against the establishment of a stronger United States Federal government and also later go against the ratification of the 1787 Constitution.
The Soviet Union invaded North Korea.
China invaded North Korea.
North Korea invaded South Korea.
Answer:
The action occurred in June 1950 that caused the United Nations to respond with military action was the North Korean invasion of South Korea.
Explanation:
The Korean War took place between 1950 and 1953. Its components were the Republic of Korea (or South Korea), supported by the armed forces of several countries commanded by the United States; and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (or North Korea), supported by the People's Republic of China and the Soviet Union. The war was one of the earliest episodes of the Cold War.
Five years before, after the end of World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union agreed to split Korea into two. They drew the border on the 38th parallel, leaving the North in charge of the Soviet Union and the South in charge of the United States. Each superpower controlled in its respective area the constitution of two new states that were under their respective orbits: the Democratic People's Republic of Korea in the north and the Republic of Korea in the south.
Although negotiations were held for the reunification of Korea in the months before the war, the tension intensified with cross-border skirmishes and incursions on the 38th parallel. The escalation of tension degenerated into an open war when North Korea invaded South Korea on June 25, 1950 .
states must provide lawyers to poor criminal defendants
a suspect cannot have an attorney present during police questioning
police must inform suspects of their rights before questioning
The answer is: that evidence seized illegally cannot be used in a criminal trial.
The Miranda rights ( also known as Miranda warning ) is an oral notification given to a person in police custody. That person is usually accused of committing a crime or criminal offence.
The accused is given the right to remain silent, meaning they can refuse to answer any questions or give information to law enforcement officials. They also have the right to have an attorney present during their interrogation. If they can not afford one, the court will appoint an attorney for them.
The Miranda warning is only given if the individual in question is about to be interrogated, and not if arrested only.
This warning was established as part of the Fifth Amendment right against self incrimination. Any evidence obtained from an accused person without them being given the Miranda rights can not be used as evidence in court.
Miranda v. Arizona was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in 1966. It ruled that statements made by the defendant in an interrogation would only be admissible at trial if the individual was aware of his rights ( silence, attorney ), and that the individual understood the rights and voluntarily agreed to them.
The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that police must inform suspects of their rights before questioning.
Further Explanations:
Ruling of the Miranda versus Arizona stated that the detained suspect must be informed about their constitutional rights before they are being questioned or arrested. As per the ruling,the 5th Amendment act prevents prosecutors from using suspect’sstatement made at the time of interrogation or in custody. It is their legal right to refer an attorney afore being questioned.
Miranda's case was regarded as a radical change in the American Criminal law as it changed the extended the significance of the Fifth Amendment. As earlier, it was expected that the act protects the citizens against compulsion to confess and contempt of court but after the ruling, it also added that the act informs citizens about their rights. The ruling led to a significant impact of the America’s Law enforcement that also became the routine procedure of police. This procedure was also called Miranda warning that was the oral notifications give to the arrested person in the custody.
Learn more
1. The impact of Furman v. Georgia (1972) was that states had to promise to use the death penalty only with approval from the Supreme Court. Throw out the old Miranda warning and write a new one. Agree to throw out all state laws regarding crime and impose national standards. Create clear Miranda to be applied Georgia before imposing the death penalty?brainly.com/question/637963
2. What was the charge of the 1807 indictment by the man who was chosen as vice president on February 17, 1801, by the House of Representatives after thirty-six ballots? brainly.com/question/8775340
3. How did henry ford’s model t contribute to the culture of the roaring twenties? brainly.com/question/7802830
Answer Details
Grade: High School
Subject: History
Chapter: Miranda versus Arizona
Keywords: Miranda versus Arizona,Miranda versus Arizona, the 5th Amendment, suspect’s statement, interrogation, custody, legal right, American Criminal law, Fifth Amendment, Law enforcement, Miranda warning,custody
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
President Wilson's worries about how the terms of the Treaty of Versailles concerned him because it contained seeds of possible future conflict. The information that supported this concern was that the terms of the Treaty of Versailles were harsher than the "14 Points PLan" that had been elaborated by President Woodrow Wilson. The Allies did not really want a peace agreement after World War 1. What they really wanted was retribution and made Germany pay for all the war damage and destruction.
limit their military
set boundaries
cripple their industry
divide their land and colonies