The destination of the first two crusades was the city of Jerusalem. The First Crusade, which was successful, led to the establishment of four Crusader states. The Second Crusade, aimed at liberating the fallen County of Edessa, was largely unsuccessful.
The first two crusades were directed towards the city of Jerusalem. The First Crusade reached Jerusalem in the summer of 1099. The Crusaders took the city, massacred the Muslim and Jewish inhabitants, and established the four Crusader States: the County of Edessa, the Principality of Antioch, the County of Tripoli, and the Kingdom of Jerusalem, claiming Jerusalem as their capital. The Second Crusade, initiated in response to the fall of the previously established County of Edessa, also targeted Jerusalem although, it was a largely failed mission.
The Church was looking to liberate Jerusalem and support the Christians in the Middle East. The vision of Jerusalem appealed to the Christians in Europe who wanted to see and touch the physical land where Jesus walked. The Crusaders saw this as a holy pilgrimage as Jerusalem was seen as an enormous relic and gateway to heaven itself.
#SPJ12
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The question is not complete, the complete question is in the form of: David is choosing between two exercise routines. In Routine #1, he burns 20 calories walking. He then runs at a rate that burns 10.5 calories per minute. In Routine #2, he burns calories 38 walking. He then runs at a rate that burns 8.5 calories per minute. For what amounts of time spent running will Routine #1 burn at most as many calories as Routine #2? Use for the number of minutes spent running, and solve your inequality for .
Answer:
Let us assume that the number of minutes spent running is t minute. The equation that represents the total calories burnt for routine 1 is given as:
20 + 10.5t
While the total calories burnt for routine 2 is given as:
38 + 8.5t
Since Routine #1 burn at most as many calories as Routine #2, hence it can be represented by the inequality
20 + 10.5t < 38 + 8.5t
Solving the inequality:
10.5t - 8.5t < 38 - 20
2t < 18
t < 9 minutes
For routine 1 to burn at most as many calories as routine 2, the time spent running must be less than 9 minutes
David should run for less than or equal to (W2 - W1) / (R1 - R2) minutes for the calories burned in Routine #1 to be at most equal to that of Routine #2. W1, W2, R1, and R2 represent the number of calories burned walking and running rate in each routine, respectively.
The question doesn't provide specific figures for the amount of calories burned through walking or running in either routine. Therefore, for our purposes, let's denote the number of calories burned walking in Routine #1 and #2 as W1 and W2 respectively, and the rate of calories burned per minute running as R1 and R2 respectively.
If x represents the time (in minutes) David spends running, the total number of calories burned in Routine #1 would be W1 + R1*x, and for Routine #2 it would be W2 + R2*x.
David would burn at most as many calories with Routine #1 as he would with Routine #2 when W1 + R1*x ≤ W2 + R2*x. To solve this inequality for x, you would perform the following steps:
#SPJ3
B.There are irrational forces that underlie seemingly rational behaviors.
C. Irrational behaviors are the downfall of organizations
D. Observations of behaviors are rational in nature.
E. There is an explanation for everything.
Answer:
B.There are irrational forces that underlie seemingly rational behaviors.
Explanation:
Psychodynamic theory sees that behavior is caused by unconscious factors (that are completly out of our one awareness) and for which we have no control. As an unsconscious mind poses thoughts and feelings they come to arise to the surface in the conscious mind as expressions of what Freud called parapraxes.
The irrational forces are inherent to a given subject , and many of his actions are been driven inconsciously that way.
Conflict arises in the mind as a result of natural drives and complex and multiple components