In my opinion it is a positive development that the vice president's resppnsibilities have increased. The reason is that in this way the vice president can demonstrate and prove that he is able to be in charge of the government in case anything happened to the president.
Answer:
In countries where the presidential system exists, it is usual to see also a vice president, who assumes mostly a figurative role, rather than a central active one, as his main purpose is to be ready if the need arises, to replace the president.
However, in many countries around the world, including the U.S, this figurative role has been exchanged for a more active one, and in the U.S most especially, the vice president now is also known as the leader of the Senate, and therefore the head of Congress. He has also been given further roles as member of the cabinet, replacing the President in many engagements in which once, he had no say, and no vote.
To my view, this is a positive development because one issue that has always existed with the position of vice president is that it is expensive to maintain, yet useless. That has changed with the increase in responsibilities given to the vice president. Second, it adds strength to the executive branch, allowing it to cover more ground than when it was just the President attending to all the needs of the nation. Third, in many regards, the vice president can become the positive image of a president, and he can give a good public image to the government that is presiding at the moment. So, given all these reasons, I see it as a positive development.
Answer:
The founders of the Song dynasty built an effective centralized bureaucracy staffed with civilian scholar-officials. Regional military governors and their supporters were replaced by centrally appointed officials. ... Song intellectuals sought answers to all philosophical and political questions in the Confucian Classics.
Explanation:
help you with what i dont see nothing?
Answer:
The bill sponsor
Explanation:
After the idea for a bill is developed and the text of the bill is written, a Member of Congress must officially introduce the bill in Congress by becoming the bill's sponsor. Representatives usually sponsor bills that are important to them and their constituents.
Mark brainlist pls
differentiation relate to Socrates' additional differentiation between "opinion” and
“knowledge"?
Answer:
While being awake means that one has the knowledge and is capable of reasoning, dreaming refers to the state of believing in mere appearances, meaning that one can form an opinion but doesn´t demonstrate knowledge.
Explanation:
In Plato's Republic, the philosopher´s idea that knowledge can´t be acquired by mere perception is illustrated through Socrates' differentiation of dreaming and being awake as two separate states of mind.
In Socratic philosophy, being 'dreaming' refers to accepting things without critical thought or functioning based on sensory experience, while being 'awake' refers to the active pursuit of understanding the world around oneself. This directly correlates with Socrates' differentiation between 'opinion' and 'knowledge', where opinions lack substantiation, whilst knowledge marks as justified, true beliefs. The 'awake' aim for knowledge while the 'dreaming' operate primarily on opinions.
In Socrates' philosophy, the differentiation between those who are 'dreaming' and those who are 'awake' refers to the difference between individuals who accept things without question, or simply live through pure sensory experience ('dreaming'), and individuals who seek to critically examine and understand their world ('awake'). In a similar vein, Socrates differentiates 'opinion' and 'knowledge' by stating that an opinion is a belief that lacks certainty and substantiation, while knowledge is justified, true belief. This differentiation is directly related and supports his previous differentiation between 'dreaming' and 'awake' as those who are 'dreaming' function based primarily on opinions, while those 'awake' strive to reach knowledge.
Learn more about Socrates' Differentiation here:
#SPJ3
The term "impeached" refers to the process of charging a public official, typically a high-ranking government official, with misconduct or wrongdoing while they are in office.
It is a formal accusation made by a legislative body, such as a national parliament or Congress, indicating that the official may have committed "high crimes and misdemeanors" or violated the law. However, it is important to note that impeachment itself does not remove the individual from office.
Instead, it initiates a legal process that can lead to a trial and potential removal from office if the charges are proven. The specific procedures and requirements for impeachment vary depending on the country and its legal system.
Learn more about impeachment here:
#SPJ6
Answer:
Foreign-born
Explanation:
Foreign-born (also non-native) people are those born outside of their country of residence. Foreign born are often non-citizens, but many are naturalized citizens of the country in which they live, and others are citizens by descent, typically through a parent.