How was power passed down through generations in Mesopotamia?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer: passed down in a hierarchical order by kingly dynasties.

Explanation:

Answer 2
Answer:

Final answer:

In Mesopotamia, power was initially held by religious priests, but over time, it gradually began to be shared with secular governors. This power eventually evolved into a monarchy system where the office of the lugal, or king, was passed down through generations, establishing dynasties. Social class, as reflected in laws such as Hammurabi's Code, also played a significant role in the distribution of power.

Explanation:

In Mesopotamia, power was initially held by religious priests who represented local gods. However, over time, this power began to be shared with secular governors, who maintained law and order, managed the economy, and lead military campaigns.

Eventually, religious and civil power became unified within the office of the lugal. The lugal was a leader who began a practice of establishing dynasties by passing down their power to their sons.

Examples of such dynasties include the Third Dynasty, which was able to control both southern and northern Mesopotamia for a period of time, and the Kassites, who, after conquering Babylon and southern Mesopotamia, established a dynasty that ruled over this territory for nearly five hundred years.

Social class also affected the distribution of power in Mesopotamia. Hammurabi's Code, for instance, identified three classes; the nobility, commoners, and the enslaved, affecting how each class was treated under the law.

In essence, power transfer in Mesopotamia was complex, steeped in a blend of religious, civil and military authority, and significantly influenced by the system of social class.

Learn more about Power Transfer in Mesopotamia here:

brainly.com/question/30553601

#SPJ3


Related Questions

What is the committee system? What is the purpose of having various committees in theCongress?
What date was the panama canal built, who had built the panama canal (or gave the orders to build the panama canal), and why was the panama canal built?
What changed in the election of 1828 and how did that effect Andrew Jackson?
How did time prove that the purchase of Alaska was not an act of folly
How do these poems reflect core buddhist teaching

Which of the following was a cause of WWII? a) sinking of the luisitania
b) establishment of german colonies in africa
c) invasion of austria by italy
d) the british and french policy of appeasement

Answers

Answer:

d) the British and French policy of appeasment

Explanation:

Look, Im about 90% sure it is this one. The policy of appeasment basically meant that britain and france turned a blind eye to a lot of the stuff hitler was doing in the late 1930's because they didnt want to start another war because 1) the horrors of WW1 were still an active memory, and 2) the 2 nations couldn't afford to go to war.

Because they turned a blind eye, hitler didnt follow a lot of the treaty of Versailles policies, he broke a few. When he invaded austria, Britian and France thought it was to unite the german speaking people. Also, Britian and France thought that Germany would be a barrier to communism and that he would not let it travel through europe, as the "red scare" was a big issue.

The Policy of appeasment let Hitler do what he wanted and allowed him to make big strides towards his bigger plans, which in turn was WW2.

The British and French policy of appeasement was a cause of WWII

Which describes oligarchy?A.
rule by a king


B.
rule by the people


C.


rule by religious authorities


D.
rule by a small group

Answers

The answer would be D, ruled by a small group.
D is oligarchy! A small group ruling is an oligarchy exactly!

Which of these was a result of the punic wars?Rome lost Hispania to Carthage
Rome destroyed Cannae and ilpia
Rome's navy became highly advanced
Rome developed trade relationships with china

Answers

Answer:

Rome's navy became highly advanced

Explanation:

It is known by the name of the Punic wars to the three armed conflicts that faced between years 264 a. C. and 146 a. C. to the two main powers of the western Mediterranean of the time: Rome and Carthage.

At the outbreak of the conflict greatly influenced the annexation by Rome of Magna Grecia, in the south of the Italian peninsula, but the main cause of the conflict between the two was the conflict of interests between the colonies of Carthage and the expansion of the Republic of Rome. The first shock occurred on the island of Sicily, partially under Carthaginian control. At the beginning of the first Punic War, Carthage was the dominant power in the western Mediterranean Sea, controlling an extensive maritime empire, while Rome was the emerging power in the center of the Italian peninsula. At the end of the third Punic war, and after decades of conflict, Rome conquered all the Carthaginian possessions and razed the city of Carthage, its capital, with which the Carthaginian faction disappeared from history.

Rome thus became the most powerful state in the western Mediterranean, which added to the end of the Macedonian wars and the defeat of the Seleucid emperor Antiochus III Megas in the Roman-Syrian war in the eastern Mediterranean, turned the Roman Republic into power dominant in the Mediterranean. The overwhelming defeat of Carthage meant a turning point that caused the knowledge of the ancient Mediterranean civilizations to pass to the modern world through Europe instead of Africa.

What happened during the boston massacre in 1770

Answers

The correct answer is A) British soldiers killed five colonists in Massachusetts.

The other options of the question were B) French fur trappers killed hundreds of British colonists in Boston. C) Native Americans killed six colonists in Rhode Island. D) Colonial militia killed 20 British soldiers in Pennsylvania.

What happened during the Boston Massacre in 1770 was that British soldiers killed five colonists in Massachusetts.

What started as a street fight between a British soldier and common people in colonial Boston, ended up as a massacre that became one of the reasons that years later caused the Revolutionary War. The incident happened on March 5, 1770, on King Street, Boston. Colonists insulted the British soldier and he responded hurting a colonist. That is when Captain Preston led some English soldiers and opened fire against the colonist.

Answer:

Explanation:

The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a "patriot" mob, throwing snowballs, stones, and sticks, and a squad of British soldiers. Several colonists were killed and this led to a campaign by speech-writers to rouse the ire of the citizenry.

Describe the attempts of the various European colonists to convert native peoples to their belief systems. How did these attempts compare to one another? What were the results of each effort?

Answers

These attempts of the various European colonists to convert native peoples to their belief systems.

Spanish- Forceful, often pressed it upon people they'd conquered.

- Missionaries

French- Jesuits, like Spanish missionaries

Dutch- Had religious diversity, but it doesn't look like they were particularly focused on conversion

English- Puritans also attempted to convert- Aggressive expansion

-Towns for converts.

The Puritans were English Protestants who believed that the Church of England needed to become more Protestant and had not been fully reformed when they sought to purge the Church of England of Roman Catholic practices in the 16th and 17th centuries.

Only a small subset of people, designated as "the elect," according to Puritans, were rescued. The rest of humanity has been condemned to hell for all time. The Puritans lived in a perpetual state of spiritual worry, looking for indications of God's favor or wrath, yet nobody knew if they were saved or doomed.

Learn more about the Puritans here:

brainly.com/question/29773668

#SPJ12

Final answer:

European attempts to convert Native Americans varied, with the Spanish enforcing Catholicism through the Encomienda system, which led to resistance like the Pueblo Revolt. The French and Dutch focused more on trade and alliances, showing less aggressive conversion attempts, but all ultimately contributed to significant changes in Indigenous lifestyles.

Explanation:

European colonists' attempts to convert Native peoples to their belief systems varied significantly depending on their origins and intentions. The Spanish colonists, for example, pursued the forceful imposition of Catholicism with the Encomienda system, which often resulted in rebellion and resistance, as evidenced in the Pueblo Revolt of 1680. Meanwhile, the French and Dutch had more modest expectations regarding conversion and instead focused on trade and alliances, leading to somewhat less direct confrontation over religious matters. Nonetheless, all these efforts were part of a larger drive for colonization that ultimately brought devastation through disease and conflict, transforming the Indigenous way of life.

PLEASE ANSWER ASAP HELP PLEASE I BEG YOU
What beliefs do Buddhism and Jainism share?

Answers

Buddhists and Jains follow:

- A vegan diet
- Non-violence
- they are non-materialistic people
- they believe in reincarnation
- they also believe that what they do determines their future (Karma)
They both believe that your actions affect your life.