Which reason for entering World War I exemplifies Wilson's goal of moral diplomacy? to improve the American economy by trading in weapons and ammunitions to support other democratic nations, especially after Russia dropped out of the war to prevent American ships from being attacked to punish the Germans for their attempted alliance with Mexico

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Moral diplomacy is a form of diplomacy proposed by US President Woodrow Wilson in his 1912 election. Moral diplomacy is the system in which support is given only to countries whose moral beliefs are analogous to that of the nation.


Answer 2
Answer:

Final answer:

The aspect of World War I that represents Wilson's moral diplomacy is the U.S.'s decision to support other democracies, especially after Russia's exit, reflecting the aim to promote democracy and peace.

Explanation:

The reason for entering World War I that best exemplifies President Wilson's goal of moral diplomacy is to support other democratic nations, especially after Russia dropped out of the war. Wilson's idea of moral diplomacy was rooted in promoting democracy and peace globally. He believed in supporting nations that shared democratic values, reinforcing positive attitudes towards the United States. Hence, stepping in after Russia's withdrawal from the war represented this goal - helping fellow democracies defeat autocratic regimes, thus spreading democratic values and maintaining global peace.

Learn more about Moral Diplomacy here:

brainly.com/question/7611874

#SPJ3


Related Questions

Explain to what extent nato is membership in this organization was a continuation or departure from us foreign policy
What was the Khilafat Movement..?
What is the meaning of in order to form a more perfect union
What is one theory to explain what happened to the settlers at Roanoke?Which colonies were the first to establish public schools?A)Southern B) New England C) Middle D) French
Please help me I’m too dumb to answer these ;-;

Economic policy in which a country encourages the production of goodsthat the country had been importing.

Answers

Answer:

Industrialization by import substitution.

Explanation:

Import Substitution Industrialization (ISI) is an economic theory that argues that a country, to achieve its development, must transform the raw materials it has instead of exporting them. That is, according to this current of thought, the State should encourage the local manufacture of first-order goods that reach the final consumer.

What items did the S?tamp Act tax?

Answers

They taxed stamps sugar clothing and tea
Papers, Legal documents, Licenses, Newspapers, Other publications, and even playing cards were taxed.

What was the signigicance of the 1990 elections in Nicaragua?

Answers

the elections removed communist control

Final answer:

The 1990 elections in Nicaragua marked the first peaceful transfer of power through democratic elections in the country. The surprise victory of Violeta Barrios de Chamorro and the UNO coalition over the incumbent Sandinistas signaled a desire for peace and economic recovery among the Nicaraguan people.

Explanation:

The 1990 elections in Nicaragua were highly significant from a political and historical perspective. This event marked the first peaceful transfer of power in the country's history, which was achieved through democratic elections. The result was a surprise, as the incumbent Sandinistas, a socialist group who had been in power since 1979, lost to the opposition United Nicaraguan Opposition (UNO) coalition led by Violeta Barrios de Chamorro.

Chamorro's victory indicated the Nicaraguan people's desire for peace after a decade-long civil war and their hopes for economic recovery. This election was a significant move towards democracy and economic stability for Nicaragua, setting a precedent for peaceful transitions through elections for future governments.

Learn more about 1990 Nicaragua elections here:

brainly.com/question/3167170

#SPJ6

Originally the Continental Drift Theory was not well received by other scientists. Why?A. There was a competing theory at
the time which was more believable,
B. There was no data showing the continents ever moved.
C. The scientists didn't know the force responsible for moving the continents.
D. The scientist presenting the data was unreliable,

Answers

Answer: The answer is A

Explanation:

What was the outcome of salutary neglect?

Answers

the outcome of the salutary neglect was REVOLUTIONARY WAR , because colonies got being used to be their own and did not like it when Britain tried to regain control.

hope it helps

Salutary neglect is an American history term that refers to an unofficial and long-term 17th- & 18th-century British policy of avoiding strict enforcement of parliamentary laws, meant to keep the American colonies obedient to England.

The term comes from Edmund Burke's "Speech on Conciliation with America" given in the House of Commons March 22, 1775

"That I know that the colonies in general owe little or nothing to any care of ours, and that they are not squeezed into this happy form by the constraints of watchful and suspicious government, but that, through a wise and salutary neglect, a generous nature has been suffered to take her own way to perfection; when I reflect upon these effects, when I see how profitable they have been to us, I feel all the pride of power sink, and all presumption in the wisdom of human contrivances melt, and die away within me." (Burke p. 186)

Prime Minister Robert Walpole stated that "If no restrictions were placed on the colonies, they would flourish".[1] This policy, which lasted from about 1607 to 1763, allowed the enforcement of trade relations laws to be lenient. Walpole did not believe in enforcing the Navigation Acts, established under Oliver Cromwell andCharles II and designed to force the colonists to trade only with England, Scotland, and Wales, the constituent countries of the British homeland as well as Ireland, then in personal union with Kingdom of Great Britain, as part of the larger economic strategy of mercantilism. Successive British governments ended this non-enforcement policy through new laws such as the Stamp Act and Sugar Act, causing tensions within the colonies.

Salutary neglect occurred in three time periods. From 1607 to 1696, England had no coherent imperial policy regarding specific overseas possessions and their governance, although mercantilist ideas were gaining force and giving general shape to trade policy. From 1696 to 1763, England (and after 1707 the Kingdom of Great Britain) tried to form a coherent policy through the Navigation acts but did not enforce it. Lastly, from 1763 to 1775 Britain began to try to enforce stricter rules and more direct management, driven in part by the outcome of the Seven Years' War in which Britain had gained large swathes of new territory in North America at the Treaty of Paris in 1763. Successive British government passed a number of acts designed to regulate their American colonies including the Stamp Act andQuebec Act. The Quebec Act was not meant to oppress the colonists, but the colonists interpreted it as so because of the Intolerable Acts being passed at the same time.

Why were the Germans motivated to militarize? Plz help ;-;

Answers

To help protect there families from the fast growing world.

Answer:

To help protect there families from the fast growing world.

Explanation: