B) Displacement
C) Retrograde amnesia
D) Decay
E) Reconstruction
Answer: Displacement
Explanation:
What is meant by displacement in your memory ?
Displacement is a term that is used to explain the fact that we tend to forget the infromation stored in the short term memory due to the lack of availability.
In a short term memory as long as the new information is acquired the old information is then eliminated quickly or displaced.
Displacement also suggest that the information that has been stored for too long will be easily displaced
Under this theory it is discovered also that when people are give a list of words to recall in any order they are mostly likely to recall those that are at the top of the list , the recalling of items at the top of the list is referred to as primacy and those at the end is know as recency effect.
Primacy effect explains that we are able to recall the first words in the list because when we first receive them there are not competing with other words so it is easy to rehearse them repeatedly for several times and as a result they get transferred to our long term memory.
As the list get longer though there is a competition now between words which makes it hard to remember or to keep rehearsing those at the end of the list as the result they stay in the short term memory until they get displaced which explains the recency effect.
As the agreement allowed for ratification of the Constitution and caused a negative effect on the nation in the long run because the slave states get more opportunities.
When anything gets under the process of ratification, this means that thing is approve or enact that is under a legally binding act. This would not otherwise be binding in the absence of such approval.
When it comes to the context of the constitution, any nation may ratify an amendment and it is done to an existing or adoption of a new constitution. It is the Three-Fifths Compromise that helped Northern and Southern states to reach an agreement that allowed for ratification of the Constitution .
As a result of it, more opportunities for the slave states are generated.
Learn more about Constitution from here:
#SPJ6
Even though the Three-Fifths Compromise supported Northern and Southern states grasp an agreement that enabled for ratification of the Constitution, in the long run, it harmed the nation because it was only a temporary resolution to the argument between " slave " and " free " states. In fact, the 13th Amendment of 1865 successfully cleaned the three-fifths compromise by banning slavery.
EXPLANATION:
However, when the 14th Amendment was passed in 1868, it legally lifted the three-fifths compromise. Section 2 of the amendment says that seats in the House of Representatives were decided according to " the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed."
The repeal of the compromise made the South more represented because members of the previously enslaved African-American population were now fully counted. However, this population pertained to be denied full citizenship benefits.
The South ratified laws like the "grandfather clause" which was intended to revoke African-American suffrage, even when the black population gave them more impact in Congress. The additional vote power not only provides the Southern states more seats in the House but also more electoral votes.
Members of Congress from other regions tried to reduce the power of the South's vote because African-Americans were deprived of their vote there, but the 1900 proposal to do so never appeared. Ironically, this is because the South had too many representatives in Congress to allow a change. Until very late in the 1960s, the Southern Democrats, so-called Dixiecrats, pertained to use disproportionate power in Congress.
This power was based in part on African-American populations, who were totaled for representation purposes but who were banned from voting by grandfather clauses and other laws that intimidated their livelihoods and even their lives. The Dixiecrats employed the power they had in Congress to slab attempts to make the South a more justifiable place.
However, finally, federal laws like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 would spoil their attempts. In the civil rights movement, African-Americans required the right to vote and eventually became an influential voting bloc.
LEARN MORE:
If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:
• What was the subject of the most debate between large and small states at the Constitutional Convention? brainly.com/question/9961732
• Which statement about the delegates at the Constitutional Convention is accurate? brainly.com/question/10864707
KEYWORDS : Three-Fifths Compromise, outlawing slavery
Subject : Social Studies
Class : 10-12
Sub-Chapter : Three-Fifths Compromise
Answer:
Chocolate (Independent variable)
Explanation:
The independent variable is manipulative. The experimenter can manipulate it. It produces one or more results in a study called the dependent variable. It is called the independent variable because its variation doesn't depend on another variable in an experiment. The independent variable can be controlled or manipulated only by the researcher or experimenter.
For example:
Amount of water and fertilizer provide a tree. Water and fertilizer is an (independent variable) which can be manipulated by the experimenter.
Result: Height of the tree depends on water and fertilizer quantity (dependent variable) which can not be manipulated by researcher.
b. the police do not become powerful at the expense of citizens’ rights.
c. judges can work with the police to keep suspected criminals in jail.
d. citizens do not become more powerful than the police.
Answer:
the police do not become powerful at the expense of citizens’ rights.
Explanation:
Advantage:
- there would be no prolonged debate between parties that involved in the conflict. They can accept that every body is different and won't spend necessary energy to change them.
- There would be less chance that both parties would hurt each other feeling over arguments.
Disadvantage:
- There would be no clear resolution regarding the issue that cause the conflict
- The conflict would most likely occurs again in the future.
Answer:
1. oil resources
2. arid climate
Explanation:
Hope this helps!