Why did some senators oppose the Versailles Treaty?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Some senators oppose the Versailles Treaty because they believed the treaty would lead the U.S. into future wars. They feared that its terms and the establishment of the League of Nations would entangle the United States in foreign conflicts and military engagements.

They were concerned that the collective security obligations of the League might drag the U.S. into wars that did not directly threaten its interests. This isolationist sentiment was fueled by a desire to maintain American sovereignty and avoid being drawn into international disputes. Ultimately, their apprehensions led to the Senate's rejection of the treaty, resulting in the U.S. not becoming a member of the League of Nations.

To learn more about Versailles Treaty, click here.

brainly.com/question/1359438

#SPJ2

Answer 2
Answer:

senators wanted to make changes to this part of the charter of the League of Nations. President Wilson didn't want this to occur. as a result, we not only didn't join the League of Nations, we didn't ratify the Versailles Treaty. We ended up signing separate peace treaties with the Central Powers


Related Questions

What is a major similarity between the World Trade Organization (WTO) andthe World Bank?
Spanish Ships vs English Ships in the Spanish Armada...This is for an essay, please help!!!
How did john smith save the colony
Dave is an executive at a large company. He is concerned that other businesses in his industry have been moving some of their operations to foreign countries in order to cut down on labor costs. The CEO has asked Dave to make a recommendation on what the company should do. Dave always acts in the company's best interest. For what reason might Dave recommend not moving operations overseas? A.) The cost of labor is much lower overseas, so the company could save money by moving its operations. B.) The company was given tax incentives to keep their operations local that cancel out their expected savings. C.) Dave's brother is a factory worker and would lose his job as a result of moving operations overseas. D.) Dave knew that competitors with new foreign operations maintained high customer satisfaction.
The Marshall Plan was a program funded by the U.S. government that

Why were the 1936 Olympics important to the Nazi's and what advantages did they bring them

Answers

The 1936 Olympics were held in Berlin, Germany - the home of the Nazis. The Nazis belief was that the Aryan Race was stronger, healthier, etc. than everyone else. The Olympics were at the height of the Nazi propaganda and they planned to utilize them to show their strengths. If members of the Aryan Race placed and took gold in all events, it would prove their points about being "better." 

Compare and contrast the great compromise and the three fifths compromise

Answers

The Great Compromise was brought up during a Constitutional Convention because the small and large states were debating on how to get fair representation with population. The larger states thought they should have more representation but the smaller states didn't want them to have more. It was suggested there be two houses in the legislative branch. The Senate part of the House would each have two seats filled by state elected officials. The House of Representatives would be elected on basis of population,

The 3/5 Compromise can up when people were trying to decide how to count slaves as part of the population count. The Southern States wanted to count the slaves so they could have more representation. The Northern States said the slaves should not be counted since they couldn't vote. It was finally decided that the 3/5 of the slaves could be counted as part of the population.

Compare:  Both measures dealt with the representation of states in Congress.  Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787.

Contrast:  The Great Compromise was about small states vs. large states.  The Three-Fifths Compromise resolved a difference between slave states and non-slave states.

Explanation:

  • The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states.  The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size.  The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation.  The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature.  Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population.  In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
  • The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery.  For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures.  (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.)   The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.

What is the difference between libel and slander?

Answers


Libel and slander are types of defamatory statements. Libel is a written defamatory statement and slander is a spoken or oral defamatory statement. In this article, we'll look at where you might find a defamatory statement, provide some different examples of libel and slander and more


Which artist produced the work shown here?A. Donatello

B. Leonardo Da Vinci

C. Raphael

D. Brunelleschi

Answers

Answer:

Option: B. Leonardo Da Vinci

Explanation:

Leonardo Da Vinci painted the Last Supper in the 15 century in Italy for the Dominican monastery. In this painting, Jesus is shown in the centre of a table and the Apostles on both sides. The painting shows the emotions that are being provoked such as rage and grief when Jesus told his followers that he was going to be crucified. The Last Supper has considered one of the most famous religious masterpiece painted in the Renaissance period.

Leonardo Da Vinci. Dated back to the 15th century, titled 'the last supper'.



Which two governments would share the characteristic of being ruled by a single leader? A. a direct democracy and a socialist state B. an absolute monarchy and an autocracy C. an autocracy and an oligarchy D. a dictatorship and a republic

Answers

I'm pretty sure the answer is B, an absolute monarchy and an autocracy

Which does not correctly describe the Louisiana Purchase?A.It cost $15 million and doubled the size of the United States.
 B.It included land that became more than a dozen states.

 C.It gave the United States control of the Mississippi River.

 D.It extended the nation's boundary to the Pacific Ocean

Answers

The statement which incorrectly describes the Louisana Purchase is that it extended the nation's boundary to the Pacific Ocean. The correct option is d.

What is Louisana Purchase?

The Louisiana Purchase was the acquisition of the territory of Louisiana by the United States from the French First Republic in 1803. In return for fifteen million dollars, or approximately eighteen dollars per square mile, the United States nominally acquired a total of 828,000 sq mi in Middle America.

However, France only controlled a small fraction of this area, most of which was inhabited by Native Americans; effectively, for the majority of the area, the United States bought the "preemptive" right to obtain "Indian" lands by treaty or by conquest, to the exclusion of other colonial powers. The Kingdom of France controlled the Louisiana territory from 1699 until it was ceded to Spain in 1762.

In 1800, Napoleon, the First Consul of the French Republic, regained ownership of Louisiana as part of a broader effort to re-establish a French colonial empire in North America.

Learn more about Purchase, here:

brainly.com/question/29757702

#SPJ3

it is D
the Louisiana purchase was only to around maybe Texas not all the way to states such as California