The Framers of the Constitution expected their newly formed country to grow over time. If they had not provided for periodic reapportionment, predict what might have happened to the representation of different States as the population changed over time.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

The periodic reapportionment that the Framers of the Constitution thought about allows the government to periodically reallot US congressional seats according to changes in population. This is a very important process for the US Congress. If the Framers had not provided periodic reapportionment, as the population changed over time in different states, then Congress might have struggled keeping up with these changes. In other words, Congress would no longer represent the population of the country fairly.

Answer 2
Answer:

Final answer:

Without periodic reapportionment, Congressional representation wouldn't mirror population changes, potentially leading to imbalances or perceived unfairness. States with population growth would be underrepresented, while those with shrinking populations would be overrepresented.

Explanation:

If the Framers of the Constitution hadn't considered and provided for periodic reapportionment, the representation of different States in the Congress may not have reflected the changes in their respective populations over time. In other words, if a state's population grew significantly compared to others, without reapportionment, they would still have the same number of representatives as they had initially. Conversely, if a state's population considerably declined, they would retain the same representation despite having fewer people. This mismatch could lead to imbalance or perceived unfairness in terms of representation, with some states having a larger voice per capita in Congress than others. This is precisely what the Framers intended to avoid by allowing for regular reevaluations and adjustments of representation based on updated population counts

Learn more about Periodic Reapportionment and Representation here:

brainly.com/question/25622387

#SPJ3


Related Questions

The colonial legislature and the governor often held different opinions. This was because the legislature represented the interests of. A: merchants B: British citizens C: the colonists, while the governor represented the interests of the, A: English colonists B: British king C: landowners
What did the story of Cincinnatus illustrate for citizens of the Roman republic
Because the war disrupted their supply of cotton, the south expected support from who?
3. President Woodrow Wilson broke offall diplomatic relations with Germanyafter Germany resumedO war on Russiathe invasion FranceO unrestricted submarine warfareO construction of an atomic bomb
A scholar would most likely compare accounts of the same event written atdifferent times in order to understand:OA. how the event influenced events that came later.OB. how the event compares to similar events elsewhere.OC. the historical biases that influenced writers in different eras.OD. how historians reached agreement on an interpretation of anevent.

Which statement is the most accurate regarding marriage in Colonial America?Women were always free to choose any husband.
A woman must be 21 years old to be married.
Marriages were arranged by parents to benefit the family
The ceremony had to be conducted by a minister of the Church of England.

Answers

Answer:

"Marriages were arranged by parents to benefit the family" is the most accurate regarding marriage in Colonial America.

Explanation:

answer:

The most accurate statement regarding marriage in Colonial America is that marriages were arranged by parents to benefit the family.

In Colonial America, marriages were often seen as a way to strengthen social and economic ties between families. The decision to marry was typically made by the parents, who would choose a suitable partner for their child based on factors such as social status, wealth, and family connections. Love and personal choice were often secondary considerations in the arrangement of marriages.

Marriages were seen as an important social and economic contract, and the primary goal was to ensure the well-being and stability of the families involved. Marrying within one's social class and maintaining family honor were often prioritized over individual desires or preferences.

It's important to note that while arranged marriages were common, there were exceptions and variations in different regions and communities within Colonial America. Some couples did have a say in their choice of spouse, especially in cases where they had a strong voice within their family or community. However, the general trend was for marriages to be arranged by parents for the benefit of the family.

alli <3

Which system of government offers a greater separation of powers between executive and legislative branches?

Answers

Federal government division: Legislative branch, judicial branch, executive branch. Six major principles of government are: 1) popular sovereignty, 2) federalism, 3) separation of powers, 4) checks and balances, 5) judicial review and 6) limited government

In the early 1800's, the rocky mountains were a barrier to the settlers moving west? true or False

Answers

True, imagine moving over the mountains on a wagon pulled by a horse. lol 

Why did these members of Parliament send this letter? A. They thought the Prince of Orange had a better claim to the throne than James II.
B.They wanted an absolute ruler like Louis XIV.
C. They were determined to have a limited monarchy, and James II would not agree.
D. They wanted a king who would protect the rights of Catholics in England.

Answers

The members of Parliament sent this letter because they believed that the Prince of Orange had a better claim to the throne than James II Therefore the correct option is A.

They believed that the Prince of Orange would be a more suitable ruler who would uphold their ideals of a limited monarchy. They were determined to establish a government system that would have checks and balances, ensuring the protection of individual rights and preventing the concentration of power in the hands of one person, as seen in the absolute rule of Louis XIV.

Additionally, they wanted a king who would safeguard the rights of Catholics in England, recognizing the need for religious tolerance and equality. Hence, the primary reason for sending the letter was their preference for a monarch who aligned with their vision of a limited and inclusive monarchy.

Hence the correct option is A.

To know more about  Louis XIV visit:

brainly.com/question/30488239

#SPJ6

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "C. They were determined to have a limited monarchy, and James II would not agree. " the members of Parliament send this letter is that C. They were determined to have a limited monarchy, and James II would not agree. 

Why did many vikiings turn to the sea to make a living ?

Answers

Vikings turned to the sea because fishing and sea food were a huge part of their culture!

How do you think romes location on the Mediterranean affected its history as it began to grow into a world power

Answers

its central location and access to seaports allowed fairly open acess for them to trade and therefore spread their influence around the Mediterranean