What did Roosevelt mean when he described the United States as the arsenal of democracy

Answer:

Mercantilism was an economic theory that encouraged government regulation of the economy for the purpose of enhancing state power. The primary goal was to run trade surpluses and thereby fill the state’s coffers with silver and gold. The predominant school of economic thought from the 15th through the 18th centuries, mercantilism rejected free trade and fueled European imperialism.

Mercantilism led to wars between European powers for control of maritime trade routes—such as the Anglo-Dutch Wars of the 17th and 18th centuries. It also created the triangular trade in the North Atlantic, which involved the export of raw materials from the colonies to Britain, the transportation of enslaved Africans to the Americas, and the subsequent importation of manufactured goods from Britain to the colonies.^1  

1

start superscript, 1, end superscript

British economic policy was mercantilist in nature. The British Parliament enacted such mechanisms as protectionist trade barriers, governmental regulations, and subsidies to domestic industries for the purpose of augmenting British finances at the expense of colonial territories and other European imperial powers. England also sought to prevent its colonies in North America from trading with other European countries and from developing a robust manufacturing industry. To this end, beginning in 1651, the British Parliament adopted a series of legislation known as the Navigation Acts.^2  

2

squared

Explanation:

so your answer is a

The sophists never set up a proper school. These are the differences with a philosopher:

The Sophist: an itinerant man who pretended to know him know everything. He said he knew and knew "the truth".

The Philosopher: a man who thinks, questions, analyzes and concludes his concepts about reality, life, existence and never claims to "know everything", but rather, he is in search of truth, because he recognizes that those who say " to know it truthfully "or that" they know where is the truth? ", those are the ones who are furthest from it. Those who claim to "know the truth" or "own the truth" are the false ones.

The Sophist: by pretending to "know everything", he went to the public square and sought to teach his "false knowledge" in exchange for money.

The Philosopher: does not seek to teach "false knowledge", but rather seeks to teach logic and coherence of what is thought to what is said or what is said and not practiced in life. The philosopher recognizes that a life without questioning does not deserve to be lived.

The Sophist: he used to preach new "ideals" for the mental formation of the Athenian citizen, because they used to teach that everyone who wants to succeed in public life has to know how to IMPOSE and CONVINCE in the assemblies of the people, everything that he affirms as true, it is not.

The Philosopher: never seeks to impose anything, but seeks to EXHIBIT his arguments, which are not inspired by the lie, but in the reason, in the logic, in the inductive-deductive processes of human knowledge and thereby specify much better the issues raised.

The Sophist: he had to find the way (even resorting to lies) of how to CONVINCE others that his "truth" is "the truth." It should also be remembered that when the sophist persuades and convinces, it is because he has only touched points. Its convenience, and not the love of knowledge. The sophist did not care if what he taught was good or not, period.

The Philosopher: he speaks well, and eloquently, but when it comes to differentiating the philosopher from the sophist, we must be aware that the philosopher can teach even if they do not pay him, while the sophist will always seek to be paid before teaching.

The Sophist: he will talk about things that he claims "to know" but he does not care if what he teaches is true or not, as long as he is paid.

The Philosopher: he will teach things that he has learnt through the researches carried out and he will gladly share them with his friends, without expecting any retribution.

The correct answer is D. Both India and China had conflicts before WWII, but new governments were formed after WWII.

Answer:
the answer to this question is as follows B- Stories of the West are often invented myths of exaggerated characters and events.

Explanation:

"(I) found one wretched old hay truck dragging in from the country… I multiplied it by sixteen.. and got up such another sweat about hay as Virginia City had never seen" (Paragraph 11) this is the part of the text that best supports this answer as well

Final answer:

An analysis of the four proposed statements indicates that option B, 'Stories of the West are often invented myths of exaggerated characters and events' could potentially be a central theme in many Western stories due to the romanticization or exaggeration of the West in literature.

Explanation:

The question you've asked pertains to analyzing the central theme of a particular text. The correct answer would rely on the content of the text itself. However, by evaluating each statement:

1. The West is a great place for people with no skills to succeed.
2. Stories of the West are often invented myths of exaggerated characters and events.
3. Twain supports liars because lying is the key to impressing others.
4. Book knowledge is more important to success than personal experience,

We can infer that option B: 'Stories of the West are often invented myths of exaggerated characters and events' seems likely to be a central theme in many Western stories. This is because it reflects on how the West is often romanticized or exaggerated in literature, establishing this as a recurring theme.

Learn more about Central Theme here:

brainly.com/question/17080286

#SPJ3