Federalists believed in a strong central government, checks and balances, and the ratification of the Constitution.
Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists
In the context of American history, the Federalists and Anti-Federalists were two political factions that emerged in the late 18th century during the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.
Unlike the Anti-Federalists, who opposed the Constitution, the Federalists believed in a strong central government with sufficient powers to maintain order and protect the rights of the people.
Three Key Beliefs of the Federalists:
Centralized Power: The Federalists advocated for a strong federal government that could effectively govern the entire nation.
Checks and Balances: They believed in a system of checks and balances that would prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful.
Ratification of the Constitution: The Federalists played a crucial role in convincing the states to ratify the Constitution, which they believed would provide a framework for a stable and prosperous nation.
Learn more about the topic of Federalists here:
#SPJ6
The Federalists believed that America needs separate executive powers for enforcing federal laws and implementing foreign policy.
Further Explanation:
They appreciated the presidency powers and wanted powerless executive. Federalist members were Alexander Hamilton, James Madison. They highlighted the weakness of the Confederation of the state government. They were of the view of the powerless executive. The superpower America needs the president who has separate executive powers for enforcing federal laws and implementing foreign policy.
The British monarch has limitless powers and the American presidency had limited powers which are checked by the other two branches of the government. President would be accountable to the Congress as well as to the people. They argued that the Constitution does not require the Bill of Rights. Anti-Federalists criticized and analysis the presidency.
They feared the danger and effects of the presidential form of government. They believe that if more powers are given to the President it will lead to the monarchy. They were of the view that the government will be unresponsive to the requirements of localities. The Constitution can limit the powers of the states.
Learn more:
1. Who was the winning general for the north in the civil war?
2. Under new imperialism, Europe did not need large numbers of people to control territories because of
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Topic: Power
Subject: Social Science
Keywords: Powerless executive, separate executive powers, foreign policy, bill of rights, accountable.
Answer:
trustee
Explanation:
According to my research on legal terminology, I can say that based on the information provided within the question he is acting as what is referred to as a trustee. Trustee's are defined as anyone in a position of trust and so can refer to any person who holds property, authority, or a position of trust or responsibility on behalf of the person placing the trust on the trustee.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The federal government to say state laws are unconstitutional