Democratic-Republican Societies were locally-organized political agrupations that arose in the US territory during 1793-94 aiming to promote and work towards democracy and republicanism and to extinguish aristocratic ideas.
The first society was established in 1793: the Germans of Philadelpia. More than 35 new ones flourished until 1975. Many of their leaders ended up becoming part of Jefferson's Democratic-Republican Party, that he founded at a national level.
The societies claimed for equal justice and knowledge diffusion. But the main and ultimate goal was to "support and perpetuate the EQUAL RIGHTS OF MAN" as, for instance, the society in NY explicitly stated. These rights included freedom of speech, opinion, press, assembly which in turn granted the right to express opinions regarding the job done by government representatives, to demand explanations about public policies and acts, the right to translate those opinion into written format and to spread them by using the press.
Democratic-Republican societies defended their right to form and comment on public affairs through their First Amendment rights of free speech and assembly, open discussion, and political participation. They voiced their views publicly and directly to officials, upheld democratic values, and championed for change and the public good.
Members of the democratic republican society defend their right to form a society and comment on public affairs primarily through the use of their First Amendment rights of free speech and assembly, as enshrined in the US Constitution. These rights allow any citizen, including those in societies such as the Democratic-Republican societies, to voice their views on public matters, criticize the government, and express contrary opinions without fear of government retribution.
Democratic-Republican societies were formed in opposition to the Federalists, who they believed were promoting aristocracy and a monarchical government over the public good. These societies made use of open discussion, sometimes referred to as communicative action, to shape and transform political systems -- a concept championed by philosopher Jürgen Habermas. This public forum allowed their ideas to be challenged and refined, pushing for change and advocating for greater representation and protection of individual liberties.
Additionally, these societies were not silent in their political participation. They published their views, organized meetings, sponsored festivals and parades, and communicated directly with elected officials, all to voice their opposition and suggest changes. Some also denounced practices such as slavery. Their actions upheld democratic values and emphasized the importance of free speech and a government responsive to its people.
#SPJ3
b. 60,000
c. 100,000
d. 600,000
B.force the states to pay the national debt
C.sell western lands to French in order to pay the national debt
D.rent soldiers to France to pay the national debt
Answer:
Alexander Hamilton's economic plan involved setting up a national bank, taxing individuals and the federal government assuming the entire national debt, including the debt of each individual state. He also wanted the country to turn more toward manufacturing and industry than farming, which was the current way of life during that time. The plan was not without controversy, and the national bank was, at one point, deemed unconstitutional.The national bank that Alexander Hamilton proposed was to be modeled after the Bank of England. This bank would be in charge of overseeing the nation's tax revenue, hold government money and make loans to the government as well as to those who wanted to borrow money from the United States. Many felt that his plan would encourage corruption. James Madison deemed the plan for a national bank unconstitutional because there were no provisions granting Congress the authority to create a banking institution. Hamilton drafted the "implied powers" doctrine that essentially took care of the unconstitutional charge. It was a document that granted Congress the power to create what they needed to so that they could carry out their constitutional duties.
Thomas Jefferson fought Alexander Hamilton over the industrial portion of the plan because he felt that the nation's people should be more dependent on themselves.One of his proposals received unqualified assent. This was to pay off at full value the principal and interest of the enormous foreign debt that the United States had built up during its struggle for independence. Hamilton, Washington, the president's other advisers, Congress, and the interested public all understood that any other course would destroy America's financial credibility. His other proposals, however, provoked great controversy, both at the level of public policy and at the level of
Explanation:
i just put everything because why not
b) It has increased foreign participation in elections.
c) It has increased competition between candidates.
d) It has enabled immediate communication between candidates and supporters.
An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.
Do not hurt others in ways you would find hurtful.
Do not make promises you cannot keep.
It is better to amass riches so you can then help people.
Answer:
The statement that is more similar to the golden rule is:
"Do not hut others in ways you would find hurtgul.
Explanation:
The reason behind the similarity is that the golden rule is sustained in only performing good actions to receive good actions.
An eye for an eye talks about providing the same treatment you receive, it is specially used to perform or fundament vengeance. Therefore is the opposite o the golden rule.
Do not make promises you cannot keep doesn't talk about executing only good actions. But about being responsible for your words.
Amass riches to help people is not also about only performing well. It talks about helping people which is not implied in the golden rule. Because the golden rule is not about helping but about performing only good actions.
Therefore, do not hurt others in ways you would find hurtful is the correct answer.
Since the golden rule is “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” the statement that is closest to this is Do not hurt others in ways you would find hurtful.
A. True
B. False