C. The government's work was made difficult because the Articles of Confederation were too weak. is your answer.
Remember, if the Articles of Confederations had worked, we would not need the Constitution.
The Articles of Confederation created an alliance of states, and a weak central body government that barely had any power (figure-head). This soon became a problem, and was solved by the creation of the Constitution, which created a 3 part main government made up of Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Branch, and a redistribution of power that allowed the National Government have more power over the State Governments.
~
B. The government was too powerful and needed to be reined.
a. True
b. False
The correct answer is A. True
Explanation:
Harriet Tubman was an African American woman known for her actions to support abolition. Tubman was born around 1822 and was a slave in a plantation in Maryland because her parents and other ancestors were also slaves. However, around 1849 and after one failed attempt Harriet Tubman escaped using the Underground Railroad that was a network of routes slaves used to scape to states or territories where slavery was not allowed.
This action took her to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania where she was free. Additionally, after Harriet Turban became a free woman she helped many others to scape; indeed, it is believed around 70 people were free because of her actions. According to this, it is true Harriet Tubman was a runaway slave from Maryland because she was a slave from childhood in a plantation in Maryland but later scaped.
Yes, Harriet Tubman was a runaway slave from Maryland. She escaped and then helped many other slaves to freedom via the Underground Railroad and is a significant figure in American history.
The answer to your question, 'Was Harriet Tubman a runaway slave from the state of Maryland?' is True. Harriet Tubman was indeed a runaway slave from Maryland. Born into slavery, she escaped and then used a network known as the Underground Railroad, to lead hundreds of enslaved people to freedom. Tubman's brave and audacious actions have made her an iconic figure in American history.
#SPJ6
Steps
Research your state constitution. Use the following questions to guide your research. Ballotpedia or Arizona State Legislature Site are great resources to help you begin.
What year was your state constitution ratified?
How long is your state constitution?
How many versions has your state constitution had?
How does your state constitution organize its executive branch
How does your state constitution organize its legislative branch?
How does your state constitution organize its judicial branch?
Complete this chart comparing your state constitution to the U.S. Constitution.
Arizona Constitution
U.S. Constitution
Date constitution was ratified
1911
1789
Length of constitution
About 45,000-46,000 words
4,400 words
Number of versions of constitution
4
Executive Branch Similarities
LegislativeBranch Similarities
Judicial Branch Similarities
Answer:1.What year was your state constitution ratified? On June 21, 1788, the Constitution became the official framework of the government of the United States of America when New Hampshire became the ninth of 13 states to ratify it.
2.How long is your state constitution? Approximately 39,000 words The average length for state constitutions is approximately 39,000 words. By comparison, the U.S. The Constitution weighs in at a relatively brief 7,591 words, including the 27 amendments.
3.How does your state constitution organize its executive branch? In every state, the executive branch is headed by a governor who is directly elected by the people. In most states, the other leaders in the executive branch are also directly elected, including the lieutenant governor, the attorney general, the secretary of state, and auditors and commissioners. “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.” The president not only heads the executive branch of the federal government but is also head of state and commander-in-chief of the armed forces.
4.How does your state constitution organize its legislative branch? Established by Article I of the Constitution, the Legislative Branch consists of the House of Representatives and the Senate, which together form the United States Congress. The Senate is composed of 100 Senators, 2 for each state.
5. How does your state constitution organize its judicial branch? State judicial branches are usually led by the state supreme court, which hears appeals from lower-level state courts. The Supreme Court focuses on correcting errors malds no trials.
Explanation:I had the same assignments
b. Spanish-speaking people who come from the same country.
c. people who share the same culture but speak different Latin-based languages.
d. people from Spain who have migrated to the United States.
Answer:
Regarding the case of Daugert vs. Pappas; the Supreme Court must be informed that John Pappas and his firm were found guilty of malpractice, due to extra temporal request to review an appeal, on a case that was previously ruled in favor of his former client. His negligence conducted to his former client to assume costs, previously overruled by the Court. Main considerations for this case evaluation were the chances of the appeal reversion, as estimated by the Jury
Explanation:
Background
The attorney John Pappas was working for Mountain Development Company (MDC). Black Mountain Ranch (BMR), a commercial entity, bought a recreation complex from MDC. Several deficiencies appeared in the construction and both parties tried to resolved who should be in charge of repairing costs, without agreement.
As a solution, both proposed an agreement, with an external advisor evaluating the situation (Anvil Corporation). When Anvil concluded its investigation, indicated that all defects were caused by a faulty design made by MDC. MDC then rejected those findings, and also, refused to pay for the corrections. To this, BMR responded with a lawsuit against MDC, indicating an agreement breach.
At the end of trial, the Court assigned the blame not to MDC, but BMR, pointing that lack of maintenance resulted in degradation of the infrastructure. BMR then filed an appeal, indicating that, since there was no wrong intention proved, the agreement was biding.
MDC asked its attorney, John Pappas, to request a review to the Court; but this request was presented a day after finishing the valid period to receive the request. Considering this, the developer lost any chance of defending themselves against the appeal, and the Court failed in favor of BMR.
Summarizing, the lawsuit that initially was provided by Court in favor of MCD, was later lost because their attorney did not requested a review, in the given time.
As consequence, MCD, represented by Larry Daugert, presented a suit against Pappas, alleging malpractice.
Daugert vs. Pappas.
Pappas and his firm were accused by Daugert of breach of duty, causing MDC to lost a case that was ruled in their favor, due to an extra temporal appeal review request.
During trial, allegations were made based on the chances of dismissal of the appeal if the review request would have been accepted. Judge considered this an issue to be ruled by Jury, indicating them that:
Finally, the Jury calculated in 20% the changes of the Supreme Court to review and reverse the appeal, meaning that Daugert was able to prove malpractice performed by Pappas.
Main elements resulting of this trial
The main element used to rule malpractice is how close are the actions of the professional to create a negative result for its customer (proximity cause). On this case, the attorney failed to present a review in time, affecting his customer. This is the main justification provided to fail against Pappas, and used to define malpractice.
Also, considering that requesting the Jury to provide probabilities of the scenarios indicated by the Judge could have been considered out of rule, this was made in base of the client’s needs, and the legal profession. This, in order to provide a perspective of this proximity cause, for the Jury.
The question refers to the citation of a specific legal case from the Supreme Court of Washington. This is a Law question appropriate for a College level student. The mentioned case, along with others, are used as precedents to shape legal investigations and decisions.
The Larry Daugert, Trustee for David M. Simms & Gail Simms versus John D. Pappas & Betty Pappas case, which was presented to the Supreme Court of Washington in 1985, and is listed in both volume 104, page 254, of the Washington Reports, Second Series, and in volume 704, page 600, of the Pacific Reporter, Second Series, is a notable reference for various legal arguments. This case, along with others such as Maricopa County, 415 U.S. 250 (1974); Attorney Gen. of New York v. Soto-Lopez, 476 U.S. 898 (1986); and Baldwin v. Fish and Game Commission of Montana, 436 U.S. 371 (1978), helps form a broader context within the field of law. Each court case contributes to the evolving interpretation of laws and constitutional rights that continually shape our legal system.
#SPJ3
They believe that elected officials must base their decisions on the laws that reflect the will of the majority. The laws must be enforced but they have to reflect the will of the people and respect the rights of the people. The reason why they fought for independence was because they weren’t consulted nor were they represented in government.
Answer: Locke believed that the purpose of government is to protect individual liberties and the natural rights of life, liberty and property. The Founding Fathers included these ideas when they wrote the Declaration of Independence.The Founding Fathers drew heavily upon English philosopher John Locke in establishing America's First Principles, most notably the recognition of unalienable rights, the Social Compact, and limited government. Locke's most profound and influential writings were his First and Second Treatise of Civil Government (1689).
Explanation:
Answer:
Locke believed that the purpose of government is to protect individual liberties and the natural rights of life, liberty and property. The Founding Fathers included these ideas when they wrote the Declaration of Independence.
Explanation: