Janet designed a star on her computer, and each side had a length of 40 mm. She reduced the figure by a scale factor of 0.65.What were the side lengths of the reduced star?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: 40 times 0.65 which gives you an answer of 26.

Related Questions

3(x+6)-2=28 to 3(x+6)=30 associative commutative or distributive
What is 3.6 as fraction?
I need advice!Let's say somebody have a F in their second quarter grade. How does this person gets there grade up for the entire school year so this person flunk 6th grade.
Lowest common factor 12 and 9
What is the initial value of y=55(1-0.02)^t

A company famous for its nacho-flavored corn chips has developed two new formulas, A and B, which they hope their customers will like even more than the original formula. To determine whether customers prefer one of the new formulas over the current nacho flavoring, a sample of 50 customers is obtained. Each customer tastes both formula A and formula B in a randomly assigned order and indicates which one they prefer more. Which of the following best describes this study?This study is not well designed because there is no replication. Each customer tasted the formulas only once.

A

This study is not well designed because formulas A and B are not compared with the original formula.

B

This study is not well designed because the sample may not have been randomly selected.

C

This study is not well designed because each customer should taste the two new formulas in the same order.

D

This study is not well designed because there is not enough replication with only 50 customers.

Answers

Answer:

The study is not well designed because the formulas A and B are not compared with the original formula.

Hence, option B is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given information:

As the company needs to check the flavors of nachos which are newly launched and to sell a particular amount the nachos should be liked by the customers.

Now, the sample of 50 customers are taken to taste the nachos as compared  to previous one and if the sample is being liked by the customers then surely the demand will increase but the formula is not compared with the original hence the study is not well designed.

From, the above observation one can conclude that the study is not well designed because the formulas A and B are not compared with the original formula.

Hence option B is correct.

For more information visit:

brainly.com/question/24204162?referrer=searchResults

flavored nachos, so as to deliver it with proper mentioned reason.Hence,

Hence,  This study is not well designed because formulas A and B are not compared with the original formula.

Step-by-step explanation:

As mentioned above, the cmpany needs to check the new upcoming flavors of nachos i.e., A and B and is said that it should meeet the requirement of getting better from their regular ones as well. For this, the company must release the two new nachos flavors A and B, irrespective of quantity and let the customers compare it with along the regular nachos.This demands for a fact that the 50 nachos been tasted should be compared with the regular flavored nachos so as to meet the demand getting better than the usual ones. For this to happen,the above mentioned study describes it the best.

This is the correct explanation for the above question

Solve A and B

a.g/-4≥17
b.8x+63>127

plz help me quickly!!

Answers

g(-1/4)>=17/(-1/4) g>=-68 8x=64 8x/8=64/8 x=8
A. (g)/(-4) ≥ 17
Multiply by -4 on either sides to cancel out
g ≥ 17

B. 8x + 63 > 127
Take 63 to the other side
    8x > 64
Divide by 8 on either sides to isolate x
    (8x)/(8)(64)/(8)
    8 and 8 cancels out
    x > 8

A bag holds 28 blue marbles and 49 red marbles. What is the ratio of red marbles to the total number of marbles in the bag? A) 7 to 11
B) 7 to 4
C) 4 to 7
D) 4 to 11

Answers

the answer to this question is A
Hi there, 28+49=77 total of marbles, 49 red marbles. 49:77, 49:77 simplified is 7:11, 7/11 and 7:11 is the same as 7 to 11. Therefore, the answer is A) 7 to 11

BRAINLIEST IF YOU EXPLAIN! A group of students is arranging squares into layers to create a project. The first layer has 5 squares. The second layer has 10 squares. Which formula represents an arithmetic explicit formula to determine the number of squares in each layer?

f(1) = 5; f(n) = 5 ⋅ d(n − 1), n > 0
f(1) = 5; f(n) = 5 ⋅ d(n + 1), n > 0
f(1) = 5; f(n) = 5 + d(n − 1), n > 0
f(1) = 5; f(n) = 5 + d(n + 1), n > 0

Answers

Answer:

f(1) = 5; f(n) = 5 + d(n − 1), n > 0

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

f(1) = 5

f(2) = 10

Required

Determine f(n)

From the formulas in the option, we understand that the sequence is Arithmetic.

And will be determined using

f(n) = a + (n - 1)d

Where a = f(1) = 5

Substitute 5 for a,

f(n) = 5 + (n - 1)d

Or

f(n) = 5 + d(n - 1)

To test,

Take n = 2

d = f(2) - f(1) = 10 - 5 = 5

So, we have

f(n) = a + (n - 1)d

f(n) = 5 + (2 - 1) * 5

f(n) = 5 + 1 * 5

f(n) = 5 + 5

f(n) = 10

Hence,

Option B answers the question.

Answer:

The person who answered above meant to say that it was C not B.

Step-by-step explanation:

His answer was (1) = 5; f(n) = 5 + d(n − 1), n > 0 and this would have been c not b. B would have been f(1) = 5; f(n) = 5 ⋅ d(n + 1), n > 0 which is incorrect.

Plz dont report me i'm just trying to correct the answer above.

And i'm not doing this for points either. Just trying to help people fix their mistakes so that others don't mess up, that is all.

What is the slope of the hypotenuses of the triangles in simplest form? First-quadrant graph showing a ray through the origin and the points (5, 2), (10, 4), and (20, 8). Two triangles each have hypotenuses with endpoints along the line, a vertical leg, and a horizontal leg. The first triangle has a hypotenuse with endpoints at (5, 2) and (10, 4). The second triangle has a hypotenuse with endpoints at (10, 4) and (20, 8).

Answers

m = (y_(2) - y_(1))/(x_(2) - x_(1)) = (4 - 2)/(10 - 5) = (2)/(5)
y - y₁ = m(x - x₁)
 y - 2 = ²/₅(x - 5)
 y - 2 = ²/₅(x) - ²/₅(5)
 y - 2 = ²/₅x - 2
   + 2         + 2
      y = ²/₅x

m = (y_(2) - y_(1))/(x_(2) - x_(1)) = (8 - 4)/(20 - 10) = (4)/(10) = (2)/(5)
y - y₁ = m(x - x₁)
 y - 4 = ²/₅(x - 10)
 y - 4 = ²/₅(x) - ²/₅(10)
 y - 4 = ²/₅x - 4
   + 4         + 4
      y = ²/₅x

HELP 20 POINTS!Please explain how it is solved!

Hannah is having a new house built. The following is an initial blueprint of her new living room and entryway.

The perimeter of the scale drawing is ______centimeters.

If the scale is 1 centimeter = 5 feet, the perimeter of Hannah's actual living room and entryway would be ______feet.

Numerically, the value of the actual perimeter of Hannah's living room and entryway would be _______times the value of the perimeter of the scale drawing.

Based on these results, if the scale is 1 centimeter = k feet, the perimeter of Hannah's actual living room and entryway would be ______feet.


Thank you!

Answers

For the first blank where it asks for the perimeter, the perimeter is all the outside sides of a shape added up. So, 6 + 1 + 2 + 4 + 4 + 5 = 22.

For the second blank, you just multiply the entire perimeter by 5, so, 22 times 5=110.

For the third blank, it is basically the same as the previous question. The answer is 5.

For the fourth blank, it is the same perimeter as the first blank, but instead of centimeters, it is in k. So, 22k.

Hope this helped! :)

Answer:The first one is 22 The second one is 110 The third one is 5 The fourth one 22k

Step-by-step explanation:

dd all the sides of the scale drawing.

So, the perimeter of the scale drawing is 22 centimeters.

If the scale is 1 centimeter = 5 feet, then the dimensions of the actual living room and entryway are 20 feet, 25 feet, 30 feet, 5 feet, 10 feet, and 20 feet. Now, add all the sides of the actual living room and entryway.

So, the perimeter of Hannah's actual living room and entryway would be 110 feet.

To find how many times larger the actual perimeter is than the scale drawing perimeter numerically, divide the numerical value of the actual perimeter by the numerical value of the scale drawing perimeter.

So, the value of the actual perimeter of Hannah's living room and entryway would be 5 times the value of the perimeter of the scale drawing.

Notice that in the scale of 1 to 5, the perimeter of the actual shape is 5 times the perimeter of the scale drawing. So, in a scale of 1 to k, the perimeter of the actual shape would be k times the perimeter of the scale drawing. Therefore, for the scale of 1 centimeter = k feet, the perimeter of Hannah's actual living room would be 22k feet.