How did the proclamation line help to push the colonies toward war with Britain?

Explanation:

1) The Stamp Act: To get money back from after the war with France parliament passed a law that upped taxes for a wide range of transactions.

2) The Townshend Acts:  Parliament tried to assert authority again by passing legislation to tax the Goods that Americans sent to Great Britain

3) The Boston Massacre: Tensions between the British occupiers and Boston residents reached a breaking point one afternoon. It all started with a disagreement between a wigmaker apprentice and a British soldier. Soon, a crowd of 200 colonists gathered around seven British troops. The situation escalated when the Americans started teasing and throwing objects at the soldiers. In response, the soldiers lost control and began shooting into the crowd.

Hope this helps your welcome

Explanation:

Taxation without representation: The colonists were outraged by the imposition of various taxes by the British government, such as the Stamp Act of 1765, the Townshend Acts of 1767, and the Tea Act of 1773. They argued that they were being taxed by a government in which they had no representation, violating their rights as Englishmen. According to historian Gordon S. Wood, this issue "became the symbol of the colonists' right to have their own elected legislatures."

Restriction of civil liberties: The colonists believed that their civil liberties were being violated by the British government. The passage of the Intolerable Acts in 1774, which were aimed at punishing Massachusetts for the Boston Tea Party, further fueled their anger. These acts included the closure of the Boston Harbor and the restriction of town meetings, which the colonists viewed as an infringement on their rights to assemble and govern themselves.

British military presence: The presence of British troops in the colonies was seen as a threat to the colonists' liberty. The Quartering Act of 1765 required the colonists to provide housing and supplies to British soldiers, further exacerbating tensions. The colonists felt that the British military presence was a constant reminder of their subjugation and an infringement on their rights.

The British viewpoint on these grievances:

Taxation without representation: The British government argued that the colonists were represented in Parliament through virtual representation. They believed that members of Parliament represented the interests of all British subjects, regardless of whether they had elected representatives. The British government saw the taxes as necessary to pay for the defense of the colonies and to alleviate the financial burden resulting from the French and Indian War.

Restriction of civil liberties: The British government viewed the Intolerable Acts as necessary measures to restore order and punish the colonists for their rebellious actions. They saw the colonists' resistance to British authority as a threat to the stability of the empire. The British government believed that it had the right to govern and control its colonies, and that the colonists' demands for greater autonomy were unreasonable.

British military presence: The British government argued that the presence of troops in the colonies was necessary for the defense and protection of British interests. They saw it as a means to maintain law and order, prevent rebellion, and protect the colonies from external threats. The British government believed that the colonists should be grateful for the protection provided by the British military, rather than viewing it as a threat.

- Wood, Gordon S. The American Revolution: A History. Random House, 2002.

Answer:

The answer is letter A, Economic Choice.

Explanation:

Let's check out the differences in the meaning of the choices.

A. Economic Choice- This is done after an economical analysis. This allows you to know the advantages and disadvantages of every choice you make. It involves maximizing the use of a utility due to scarce resources. It also allows you to know whether a particular good or service will be beneficial for you or not and whether the benefits will outweigh the cost.

One example of economic choice is knowing how many pairs of t-shirts you are going to buy for Christmas and whether the cost of buying those t-shirts is worth the benefits the t-shirt will serve, provided that you only have a limited amount of money. So, letter A is the answer.

B. Supply and Demand Choice- This helps determine the prices in the market. For example, if people want to buy blue socks (increase demand) then the shops will increase their supply of blue socks. Supply is directly proportional to demand.

C. Opportunity Choice- This refers to the opportunity cost of a choice, which means the value of the best alternative given up. For example, if you spend your whole day dating your boyfriend, you won't be able to spend that amount of time studying your subjects in school.

Answer: C. because it is the Electoral College that chooses the president, individual citizens' votes are not important.

Explanation: That is not true because the citizens votes do matter and even though the Electoral College chooses the president that does NOT mean that citizens votes don't matter. Plus the Electoral College matters on their votes and citizens votes when electing president.

I know I'm late sorry