To have the most impact when using email you should structure your messages so that

Answer:

A. price of the good

Explanation:

In any market, the price can be studied in two perspectives. That of the buyer, who uses it as a reference of potential utility, and that of the seller, for the one or which means first a guide of the possible income of his activities and, secondly, the method by which he converts them into profits.

From this point of view there are several concepts that should be kept in mind: price of offer, or price at which the seller offers his merchandise. Demand price is what a consumer is willing to pay. Market price or observed prices are the prices at which real purchases took place.

In a theoretical situation - of free market - the price would be fixed by the law of supply and demand. In the case of a monopoly the price "is on each occasion the highest that can be squeezed out of the buyers, or the one that, presumably, they will consent to give."

In a real situation - imperfectly competitive prices are determined through other mechanisms, such as maximizing marginal income (see also oligopoly; oligopsonio, Monopolistic Competition; Stackelberg competition; cobweb theorem, etc.)

the correct answer is

c. He enjoyed an easygoing and respectful relationship with his patron, Pope Julius II.

i just took the test :)

Answer:

(C) Many were inspired to enlist in the army.

Explanation: great choice!

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached or further historic references, we can comment on the following.

It seems that we are talking about the Great Arab Revolt that started in June 1916 and ended until June 1918, during the actions of World War I.

The group that most likely supported Hussein in his rebellion were the Hashemites, with the support of the British troops.

The Arab troops fought the Ottoman Empire's troops. The Arabs had the support of Great Britain. That is why the Arabs tried to create a free unified state, from Yemen to Syria. At least that was what the Sharif of Mecca, Hussein bin Ali.

The Great Arab Revolt led by Hussein bin Ali was supported by a broad coalition of Arab nationalists, tribal leaders, and various segments of Arab society who shared a desire for independence and the opportunity to shape their own political destiny free from Ottoman rule.

The group that most likely supported Hussein bin Ali in his rebellion during the Great Arab Revolt were the Arab nationalists and tribal leaders of the Arabian Peninsula. Several factors contributed to their support for Hussein's rebellion:

• Anti-Ottoman Sentiment: Many Arabs harbored deep-seated grievances against the Ottoman Empire, which had ruled over various Arab lands for centuries. Ottoman rule was often characterized by heavy taxation, conscription, and political marginalization of local Arab leaders. These grievances fueled a desire for greater autonomy and independence.
• Arab Nationalism: Arab nationalism was on the rise during this period, driven by a sense of Arab cultural identity and a desire for self-determination. Prominent Arab intellectuals and leaders, including Hussein bin Ali, espoused nationalist ideals that emphasized Arab unity and self-rule.
• Promises of Independence: Hussein bin Ali received assurances from the British government, particularly through correspondence with Sir Henry McMahon, the British High Commissioner in Egypt, that if he led the Arab Revolt against the Ottoman Empire, the British would support Arab independence in the Arabian Peninsula and other Arab lands. These promises provided a powerful incentive for Arableaders to join the revolt.
• Tribal Support: Hussein bin Ali was a respected tribal leader himself, belonging to the Hashemite clan. He was able to garner support from other tribal leaders who saw the opportunity to assert greater control over their territories and communities under his leadership.
• Religious Significance: Hussein's lineage traced back to the Prophet Muhammad, making him a figure of significant religious and cultural importance in the region. This lineage added legitimacy to his leadership and the rebellion in the eyes of many Arabs.

For similar questions on Great Arab Revolt

brainly.com/question/22966748

#SPJ3

Answer:

The Crimean war was the war that weakened the economy of the Ottoman Empire in the mid 1800s. Positioning them as the Sick Men of Europe.

Explanation:

In the first place, the Crimean war was a conflict fought by Russia, The Ottoman Empire, France, Britain, and many others. Why? well, because it is the first hand there were geopolitical reasons to gain power over the region and because the Orthodox and the Catholic churches had differences and citizens claimed rights over the Holy land.

In the second place, Russia and the Ottoman Empire started it and Russia was winning, the trade routes were in danger and The Ottoman Empire was going to lose control and could have been colonized by Russia. The thing was that it wasn't convenient for Britain and France, why? trade routes, money, they had control over the Ottoman empire by economic means. That's why they decided o back The Ottoman empire and sum forces with everyone who wanted a piece of the cake.

In third place, the alliance against Russia won the war, won territory and Russia offered a treaty of peace. But the Ottoman Empire lost ports, lands and was considered "The Sick Men of Europe" while Russia improved all its flaws and got ready for the next era in his history. The real winners were Britain and France who won power over territories, lands, agreements by the means of economy.