An internal conflict is the struggle occurring within a character's mind. Things such as the character views for, but can't quite reach. As opposed to external conflict, in which a character is grappling some force outside of him or herself, such as wars or a chain breaking off a bike, or not being able to get past a road block. The dilemma posed by an internal conflict is usually some ethical or emotional question. Indicators of internal conflict would be a character's hesitation or self-posing questions like "what was it I did wrong?".An internal conflict can also be a decision-making issue.
The term "internal conflict" is also widely used to describe a military conflict within a nation, such as a civil war. An internal conflict is a non-international conflict. It can be because of political, economic or religious causes.
Internal conflict is the struggle in the mind, or a characters mental struggles.
British forts would be built in American towns.
The colonists must give a quarter of their money to pay for British soldiers.
The colonists must provide living quarters for British soldiers.
Never mind i figured it out but feel free to say something for 10 points
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Quartering Act is a name given to two or more Acts of British Parliament requiring local governments of the American colonies to provide the British soldiers with housing and food. Each of the Quartering Acts was an amendment to the Mutiny Act and required annual renewal by Parliament.[1] They were originally intended as a response to issues that arose during the French and Indian War and soon became a source of tensions between the inhabitants of the Thirteen Colonies and the government in London, England. These tensions would later lead toward the American Revolution.General Thomas Gage, commander-in-chief of forces in British North America, and other British officers who had fought in the French and Indian War (including Major James Robertson), had found it hard to persuade colonial assemblies to pay for quartering and provisioning of troops on the march. Therefore, he asked Parliament to do something. Most colonies had supplied provisions during the war, but the issue was disputed in peacetime. The Province of New York was their headquarters, because the assembly had passed an Act to provide for the quartering of British regulars, but it expired on January 2, 1764,[2] The result was the Quartering Act 1765, which went far beyond what Gage had requested. No standing army had been kept in the colonies before the French and Indian War, so the colonies asked why a standing army was needed after the French had been defeated in battle.
This first Quartering Act[3] was given Royal Assent on May 15, 1765,[4] and provided that Great Britain would house its soldiers in American barracks and public houses, as by the Mutiny Act 1765, but if its soldiers outnumbered the housing available, would quarter them in "inns, livery stables, ale houses, victualing houses, and the houses of sellers of wine and houses of persons selling of rum, brandy, strong water, cider or metheglin", and if numbers required in "uninhabited houses, outhouses, barns, or other buildings." Colonial authorities were required to pay the cost of housing and feeding these soldiers.
When 1,500 British troops arrived at New York City in 1766 the New York Provincial Assembly refused to comply with the Quartering Act and did not supply billeting for the troops. The troops had to remain on their ships. With its great impact on the city, a skirmish occurred in which one colonist was wounded following the Assembly's refusal to provide quartering. For failure to comply with the Quartering Act, Parliament suspended the Province of New York's Governor and legislature in 1767 and 1769, but never carried it out, since the Assembly soon agreed to contribute money toward the quartering of troops;[5] the New York Assembly allocated funds for the quartering of British troops in 1771. The Quartering Act was circumvented in all colonies other than Pennsylvania.
This act expired on March 24, 1776..
Answer:
i think it is c
Explanation:
The three totalitarian regimes aimed to have a total right over their citizens. The political space and the forms of organized social activity ceased to exist outside of what was allowed and managed by the regime itself. Attempts were made to mold the attitudes and behaviors according to their ideological dogmas. Identification with the regime was sustained by an internal enemy. The penetration of the values of the regime in society was lower in Italy and much higher in Germany, the success of indoctrination was focused on the young. The regimes were successful in mobilizing large numbers of idealists and to win popular support as any type of opposition was repressed. In Germany there was more popular support, while in the Soviet Union the support was less authentic as the population was more coerced. The three resorted to heavy-handed and terrorist repression.
The Soviet Union exercised an extraordinary degree of terror directed against its own citizens. The Nazis concentrated on crushing any type of organized political opposition and on the weakest and least numerous minorities. The fascists imposed terror in the Italian colonies that were in Africa. Italy was weak in its ideological dynamism and militarization, in the Italian people there was no excessive fixation with military glory. In the Soviet Union the ideological force was powerful. Its purpose was to mobilize an economy directed by the state, to restructure the agricultural production and to industrialize the country. The ideological dynamism in Germany stands out for its clear focus on the intensification of the persecution of internal enemies and for its preparations to face a military conflict.
Answer:
The party ceased to exist at the end of the War of 1812. Numerous Federalists opposed the war because many of these men earned their living through trade. The conflict hampered the Federalists' ability to exchange with England.
Explanation:
This Party in particular opposed war. Hope this Helps