What does dispersion mean

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: Dispersion means the separation of light into colors by refraction or by 
diffraction.
Answer 2
Answer: the action or process of distributing things or people over a wide area

Related Questions

Adolescent in the formal operational stage typically have unrealistic or impractical solutions to solving world issues
Why was tea important to China’s economy and its relationship with other countries?
How do you account for the development of political parties in the United States during the period 1787-1800
The main purpose of the Wagner Labor Relations Act of 1935 was to:(A) end the sit-down strike in Flint, Michigan. (B) settle the struggle between the AFL and the CIO. (C) ensure workers' right to organize and bargain collectively. (D) guarantee workers a minimum wage. (E) exempt organized labor from the Sherman Antitrust Act.
Like a car, a relationship needs what?

When does personal information often need to be entered online?when conducting an Internet search
when watching streaming videos
when downloading free software
when gaining access to a website

Answers

Answer:

When gaining access to a website

Explanation:

Answer:

D. when gaining access to a website

The Spirit of the Laws. When did he write this and why? What was his purpose? What was happening at the time that can provide insight into the motivations and perspective of the author?

Answers

According to Montesquieu, the executive power should be in the hands of a monarch, or asingle person, whereas the legislative power should be held by many people. This is becausethe executive branch of government, “which has always need of expedition,” is moreefficiently run by one person. The legislative branch, according to Montesquieu, is betterregulated when it is run by many people.What does Montesquieu say about the idea of the executive limiting the legislative power?How about the legislative limiting the executive power?Montesquieu believes that the executive power must limit the legislative power by regulatingthe time of convening and the duration of the assemblies, according to the circumstances. Onthe other hand, the legislative power can limit the executive power by examining the in whatmanner its laws have been executed.Who, according to Montesquieu, should comprise the army, and what role does he say thearmy should play?According to Montesquieu, the executive power should lead the army. However, to prevent theoppression of the people, he believed that there should be a standing army that has anallegiance to their officers and to the people they are duty-bound to protect. Montesquieu heldthe belief that the army should be comprised of men of action who are the embodiment of thespirit of the people, and who will use their courage as their strengthTo Montesquieu, what will ultimately cause the state to perish?Montesquieu believes that the state will perish because it will lose its liberty. He goes on topoint that Rome, Sparta and Carthage have perished; so why not the state? To Montesquieu,the state will perish when the legislative power is more corrupted than the executive powe

|x+12|=323 absolute value

Answers

Answer:

x=311

Explanation:

What would be some of the drawbacks of having the victims of crime, rather than the state (through its public officials), prosecute criminals?

Answers

Answer:

1. More Crimes

2.Emotional Trauma

3.Injustice/ corrosion of the Judicial system

4, Dampened Cultural Values

Explanation:

, The drawbacks will be

1. More Crimes: When criminals see that there criminal acts are not been prosecuted by the state, they will engage in more crimes. This will invariably lead to more loss of lives and property.

2. Emotional Trauma. Most times, after a criminal scene,a victim is left traumatize for days if not weeks because of the experience. When criminals are mot been prosecuted, we will have a,lot of emotionally drained/traumatize people in the society

3. Injustice: it is a sign of injustice. It will take a negative ripple effect on the judicial system of a state.

4, It dampens the cultural value of a people, This will greatly affect the cultural values our forebears have built and laboured for over the years. When we have no cultural values, it mean our kids have no standards. When there is no standard, they won't be able to stand for what is right.

The draw back would be that many crimes would go unpunished. Some victims could be to scared, some would prefer to forget about the crime and focus on other things in their lives. 

Compare and contrast the hominids australopithecus and homo erectus

Answers

Humans are members of the genus Homo click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced. Modern people are Homo sapiens click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced. However, we are not the only species of humans who have ever lived. There were earlier species of our genus that are now extinct. In the past, it was incorrectly assumed that human evolution was a relatively straightforward sequence of one species evolving into another. We now understand that there were times when several species of humans and even other hominins were alive. This complex pattern of evolution emerging from the fossil record has been aptly described as a luxuriantly branching bush on which all but one twig has died off. Modern humans are that last living twig. Complicating this evolutionary history even more is the realization that our ancestors very likely mated successfully with members of other closely related species from time to time. As a consequence, our inherited gene pool was enriched by added genetic diversity. This sort of genetic mixing has recently been documented for Neandertals and early modern Homo sapiens living 40-60,000 years ago. It is also likely that there were genetic bottle necking events that periodically reduced our diversity. That largely accounts for the fact that despite our huge human population today, we are remarkably similar genetically compared to other primate species. It also explains why we are now the only surviving hominin species.

The striking similarities in appearance between the human genus Homo and our ancestors, the genus Australopithecus click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced, is sufficient reason to place us both into the same biological tribe (Hominini click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced). Both genera are bipedal and habitually upright in posture. Humans have been somewhat more efficient at this mode of locomotion. Like australopithecines click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced, early humans were light in frame and relatively short. They were only about 3 ft. 4 in. to 4 ft. 5 in. tall (100-235 cm) and weighed around 70 pounds (32 kg) The evolution of larger bodies occurred later in human evolution. The differences between australopithecines and early humans are most noticeable in the head. Humans developed significantly larger brains and relatively smaller faces with progressively smaller teeth and jaws. In addition, humans became ever more proficient in developing cultural technologies to aid in their survival, while the australopithecines did not.

What were denis diderots thoughts on government

Answers

Answer:

Denis Diderot lifework, the Encyclopedia, was a powerful weapon against ecclesiastical and governmental institutions. It revealed the truth; it contained “maxims that would tend to destroy royal authority… and lay the foundations for the corruption of morals and religion”

Explanation: