As the agreement allowed for ratification of the Constitution and caused a negative effect on the nation in the long run because the slave states get more opportunities.
When anything gets under the process of ratification, this means that thing is approve or enact that is under a legally binding act. This would not otherwise be binding in the absence of such approval.
When it comes to the context of the constitution, any nation may ratify an amendment and it is done to an existing or adoption of a new constitution. It is the Three-Fifths Compromise that helped Northern and Southern states to reach an agreement that allowed for ratification of the Constitution .
As a result of it, more opportunities for the slave states are generated.
Learn more about Constitution from here:
#SPJ6
Even though the Three-Fifths Compromise supported Northern and Southern states grasp an agreement that enabled for ratification of the Constitution, in the long run, it harmed the nation because it was only a temporary resolution to the argument between " slave " and " free " states. In fact, the 13th Amendment of 1865 successfully cleaned the three-fifths compromise by banning slavery.
EXPLANATION:
However, when the 14th Amendment was passed in 1868, it legally lifted the three-fifths compromise. Section 2 of the amendment says that seats in the House of Representatives were decided according to " the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed."
The repeal of the compromise made the South more represented because members of the previously enslaved African-American population were now fully counted. However, this population pertained to be denied full citizenship benefits.
The South ratified laws like the "grandfather clause" which was intended to revoke African-American suffrage, even when the black population gave them more impact in Congress. The additional vote power not only provides the Southern states more seats in the House but also more electoral votes.
Members of Congress from other regions tried to reduce the power of the South's vote because African-Americans were deprived of their vote there, but the 1900 proposal to do so never appeared. Ironically, this is because the South had too many representatives in Congress to allow a change. Until very late in the 1960s, the Southern Democrats, so-called Dixiecrats, pertained to use disproportionate power in Congress.
This power was based in part on African-American populations, who were totaled for representation purposes but who were banned from voting by grandfather clauses and other laws that intimidated their livelihoods and even their lives. The Dixiecrats employed the power they had in Congress to slab attempts to make the South a more justifiable place.
However, finally, federal laws like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 would spoil their attempts. In the civil rights movement, African-Americans required the right to vote and eventually became an influential voting bloc.
LEARN MORE:
If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:
• What was the subject of the most debate between large and small states at the Constitutional Convention? brainly.com/question/9961732
• Which statement about the delegates at the Constitutional Convention is accurate? brainly.com/question/10864707
KEYWORDS : Three-Fifths Compromise, outlawing slavery
Subject : Social Studies
Class : 10-12
Sub-Chapter : Three-Fifths Compromise
Answer: Prior Hypothesis Bias is the tendency for people with strong prior beliefs
Explanation:
Prior Hypothesis Bias:
Prior Hypothesis bias occurs when we string believe in relations between two variable and decide based on those beliefs even when there is proof that our belief is wrong. We tend to look for evidence that will support our existing beliefs while rejecting any information that goes against those beliefs.
The approach to ethics mentioned in the question is known as utilitarianism, which is a form of consequentialist ethics.
Hence the statement given is true.
This approach focuses on the consequences of an action and seeks to maximize the overall good or happiness for the greatest number of people.
Therefore, in order to apply this approach, you need to consider how different courses of action would affect different people and choose the one that will provide the greatest benefit to the most people.
For more similar questions on ethics
#SPJ11
I would think true.
I'm not sure what this is referencing, but this is how i would describe ethics.