Henry Hudson's journey from North Cape to the Hudson River took place in 1609, but there are no exact records indicating the length of this voyage. The voyage's duration would have been influenced by the era's transportation methods and geographical conditions. For perspective, even in the 19th century, shorter trips took several days.
The English sea captain Henry Hudson was employed by the Dutch East India Company in the year 1609 when he set out exploring. The length of time that it took for Hudson's voyage, specifically from North Cape to the Hudson River, is not clearly mentioned in records. But, to provide some context, during that era, mode of transportation and geographical conditions would have significantly impacted travel durations.
Hudson was seeking a northwest passage to Asia, and he explored New York Harbor and the river that now bears his name, the Hudson River. Although his primary goal was to find a passage to Asia, the plentiful furs, especially coveted beaver pelts, he found in the region he explored became a reason to claim the land for the Netherlands.
Travel, even by sea, would not have been as fast-paced during Hudson's time as it is now. For reference, even in the 19th century, it took a minimum of 4 days to travel from Boston, Massachusetts, to Providence, Rhode Island. In consideration of the tools and technology available in the 1600s, Hudson's voyage from the North Cape to the Hudson River would have taken a considerable amount of time.
#SPJ12
the northern lights are seen in the thermosphere
B) Not as market-oriented
C) More focused on exports
D) Less government-control
Will give best answer, and will thank. Please hurry I appreciate any help. :)
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Not as market-oriented. For sure those countries are very different. Japan is a country with a high developed business, market, technology, culture. India is an emerging economy, subsistence agriculture, still developing technology and trade markets.