It was The Equal Pay Act
The President's Commission on the Status of Women (PCSW) was established to advise the President of the United States on issues concerning the status of women. It was created by John F. Kennedy's Executive Order 10980 signed December 14, 1961.
The suitability of a more direct democracy in the U.S. is subjective, balancing increased citizen involvement with potential challenges, making it a complex matter open to debate.
Whether the U.S. government would be better as a more direct democracy is a complex question with diverse opinions. While direct democracy allows for greater citizen involvement and decision-making, it also presents challenges.
Pros:
Enhanced Citizen Participation: Direct democracy enables citizens to have a more direct influence on policies and laws through initiatives and referendums.
Accountability: Elected officials may be held more directly accountable to the people's will.
Responsive to Public Opinion: Policies may better reflect the immediate preferences of the majority.
Cons:
Complexity: Direct democracy can be impractical for a large and diverse country like the U.S., as it requires citizens to be well-informed on numerous complex issues.
Potential for Tyranny of the Majority: It can lead to the marginalization of minority groups or their interests.
Lack of Expertise: Citizens may not have the expertise needed to make informed decisions on all matters.
In summary, the effectiveness of a more direct democracy in the U.S. depends on various factors, including the size and diversity of the nation, the ability of citizens to stay informed, and mechanisms to protect minority rights.
Some argue that a mixed system, with representative democracy combined with elements of direct democracy, strikes a balance between citizen participation and effective governance.
for such more question on direct democracy
#SPJ2
Answer:
I don't know...call me crazy, but I don't think this would be such a bad idea (at least sometime in the future.) With the advent of the internet, there really is no reason why people can't have more input on legislation. Remember, congressmen act as representatives of the people for logistical reasons. Were voting allowed via internet, mail, or permanent polling places, the logistical roadblocks are reduced.
This country has an annoying quality where senators and representatives are elected and then inject their own personality into their voting. They are supposed to represent the people of their district. If 60% of the people in their district feel a certain way about an issue, why is the congressman/woman allowed to vote a different way? Why do their personal beliefs really matter at all? They are supposed to be voting the way their district wants regardless of what they personally believe.
I know, I know, things can be horribly complicated and the average person can't possibly understand all the issues they are voting on, but last I checked their is no intelligence requirement to be in the government...many people in governement now are dumb as a box of rocks. They don't have to be smart to be elected, they have to be personable and have good advisors working in the background.
Imagine being able to directly vote on education issues, warfare issues, and being able to prioritize budget items. Instead of blaming the morons in congress we would only be able to blame ourselves when things went horribly wrong. Of course, some form of standing governement would still be needed for a lot of reasons.
Again, I know the technology is not hot enough right now to provide the secruity that would be needed, etc, but it won't be long...
Answer:
It has come to our attention that someone has been taking extra supplies out of the supply closet for some time now, and this is NOT allowed. The office manager has said that if it continues to happen we will have to put up security cameras, and this will come out of the office budget, therefore, our paycheck! Please make sure that you are only using what is being budgeted for your department.
Answer:
ok It has come to our attention that somebody has been taking extra supplies out of the supply cabinet for some time now. This is not allowed, the office manager says that if this continues we will have to put up security cameras up around the building. This will come out of the office budget therefore, our paycheck! Please make sure that you are only using what is in the budget for your department.
Answer:
because if it never happend there would be no america if no one discoverd it feel,touch,smell,taste LOL there would be no america
Explanation:
Answer:
c. He argued that it did not do enough to guarantee equal rights for African Americans
Explanation:
The Civil Right Act of 1866 passed in April 9 wwas the first U.S federal law which defined citizenship and stated that all citizens are equal and should be protected by law. This bill was first passed in 1865 but was rejected by President Andrew Johnson based on the argument the blacks were not qualified to be U.S citizens. It was again passed by the congress in April 1866 but President Andrew Johnson rejected it again. It was overrode by two third majority in the congress chamber who then passed into law without the president signature.
Answer:
Non of the answers best described how he reacted to the Civil Right Acts of 1866.
Explanation:
Th civil right of 1866 was the first time Americans attempted to formalize the citizenship of people living in the United Sates. It was a fall out of the American Civil war aimed at protecting the people of color, people of African descent after the abolition of slave trade.
However, President Andrew Johnson vetoed it because he did not believe in the emancipation of slave when the war started.
Answer:
drainage
Explanation:
drainage basin
If you learned about this you would know. But if you don't I highly suggest you look back in the course material as this has many solutions.