A privateer is an armed ship owned by private persons and holding a government commission to attack and capture.
Privateers only engage in maritime warfare if there’s a war commission. Privateers cannot get their compensation if they cannot seize an enemy’s assets.
Answer:
Privateer, is the right answer.
Explanation:
A privateer is any person or ship that engages in naval combat following a board of war. The Commission approves that individual to bring on all sorts of resentment permissible at sea by the precepts of war, that includes invading alien crafts throughout wartime and taking them as bonuses. During the war, aquatic reserves were subject to operations on the ground so privateering was a method of promoting state government by concentrating loaded crafts and privateers.
After the Iranian Revolution, the nation's new leader was Ayatollah Khomeini. Hence, Option C is correct.
Ayatollah Khomeini's full name was Ruhollah Musavi Khomeini. He was an Iranian politician as well as a religious leader. He was the first supreme leader of Iran from 1979 until his death in 1989.
Ayatollah Khomeini was born on September 24, 1902. After the Iranian Revolution, the supply of oil was disrupted. When the revolution was over, it was Ayatollah Khomeini who became the nation's new leader.
Hence, Option C is correct.
Learn more about Ayatollah Khomeini from here:
#SPJ2
The Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, was removed from power and replaced by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.
The correct answer is Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini
B. Safavid rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his close friend Abu Bakr, whereas Ottoman rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his son-in-law Ali.
C. Ottoman rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his close friend Abu Bakr, whereas Safavid rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his son-in-law
The correct answer is C) Ottoman rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his close friend Abu Bakr, whereas Safavid rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his son-in-law.
The statement that accurately contrasts the Ottoman and Safavid empires in the 16th century is Ottoman rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his close friend Abu Bakr, whereas Safavid rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his son-in-law.
The Sunni Muslims recognized and respected the Four Caliphs as their religious leaders. But the Shiite Muslims believed that Ali, the descendant of the Four Caliphs, was its religious leader. Both factions had to settle their differences to have a better chance to fight the Christian Crusaders that that wanted to take the lands of the Temple of Salomon to the Christians.