which statement best describes the difference between the way the poets address thieir subjeect in to my dear loving husband and to the kings most excellent majesty

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "Bradstreet uses descriptive words to emphasize a woman's role in marriage, while Wheatley uses descriptive words to emphasize the king's actions." This is the statement that best describes the difference between the way the poets address thieir subjeect in to my dear loving husband and to the kings most excellent majesty.
Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Edge :)


Related Questions

Kyle made brownies and a cake. He cut the brownies into 6 equal parts and the cake into 8 equal parts. His family ate 3/4 of the cake. If his family ate more cake than brownies, what fraction of the brownies could have been eaten?
Which sentence contains a misplaced modifier? A. Occasionally, a teenager skates past our house with a wide grin and waves to us. B. I want to learn to be a skater like her someday. C. A flip, a grind, and an ollie are all tricks that challenge this daring skater. D. Many a child watches as the teenager rolls down the street.
When a helping verb is used with the _______, the progressive form of the verb is createdA. present participle B. past participle C. verb "to be" D. present tense
Which of these statements best describes the remedy Arnold proposes for the world?A. Look to your dreams for answers to life's questions.B. The world may end, but love conquers all.C. In this deceptive world, ignorance requires faith.D. Our faith in each other can shelter us from deceptive chaos.
How is caesar described in caius julius caesar the first roman that came into britain

Complete it

arrange the following sentence to make 3 meaningful paragraph.​

Answers

Answer:

Karma lived with his parents in a thatched small house in a silent corner of the village. He used to go to his school and enjoyed studying and mid day meals there. This all stopped as his parents could not afford to send him to school to impart further education to him. Besides, they needed his help in odd jobs in the house as well as their fields.

Lord of the flies chapter 3:
What often happens when the littluns are sleeping?

Answers

They often wet their pants.

Final answer:

When the littluns are sleeping in Chapter 3 of Lord of the Flies, they often experience nightmares and fears that awaken them. The presence of the beast and the potential dangers in the woods cause anxiety among the littluns.

Explanation:

When the littluns are sleeping in Chapter 3 of Lord of the Flies, they experience nightmares and are often awakened by their own fears. One example is when Percival has a nightmare about a beast. He wakes up screaming and is comforted by Ralph. Another example is when another littlun claims to have seen a snake thing in the woods, causing fear and unrest among the group.

Learn more about Littluns' Sleeping Experience here:

brainly.com/question/34389140

#SPJ6

A pundit is a ------ person and is often a critic in his/her line of work.

Answers

Yes, a pundit is a person who knows a lot about a particular subject and who expresses ideas and opinions about that subject publicly. 

Give the original language from which this term was derived. "Memorial".
Dutch
Greek
Hebrew
Latin
Old French

Answers

The anwser to that my friend is Old french or if that doesnt work try latin hope this helps

Answer:

The correct answer is indeed Latin.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!!

What does the meaning of this sentence?" All voting is a sort of gaming, like checkers or backgammon, with a slight moral tinge to it, a playing with right and wrong, with moral questions; and betting naturally accompanies it. The character of the voters is not staked. I cast my vote, perchance, as I think right; but I am not vitally concerned that that right should prevail. I am willing to leave it to the majority. Its obligation, therefore, never exceeds"

Answers

Answer:

This is an excerpt from Henry David Thoreau’s seminal essay “Civil Disobedience.

He is of the opinion that casting your vote is not the end of the democratic process. He is advocating civil disobedience and a participatory democracy.

Furthermore, although your vote might be overwhelmed by the majority, you still have a moral obligation to ensure a better leadership. It must exceed just the ballot

Final answer:

The sentence provides an abstract view of voting, portraying it as a game of chance with moral considerations where the result depends on the majority, and not necessarily aligning with one's personal vote.

Explanation:

This sentence seems to be offering a commentary on the nature of voting as a process. The author appears to be suggesting that all voting inherently has an aspect of chance to it, akin to playing a game like checkers or backgammon. They bring up a moral element, implying that voting involves making decisions about what is right and wrong. However, they also note that 'the character of the voters is not staked', suggesting that the individual's personal integrity or morality isn't under threat when one votes. The author accepts the majority's decision, even if it contradicts their own vote, and doesn't feel obligated to make the 'right' choice win.

Learn more about Voting here:

brainly.com/question/32112056

#SPJ3

What does Atticus see as a sign that perhaps things are beginning to change?the convincing nature of Tom's testimony
the time it took the jury to decide the case
the fact that Tom wasn't lynched before the trial
Judge Taylor's evenhandedness in the case

Answers

In chapter twenty-three of Harper Lee’s To kill a Mockingbird, Atticus has a conversation with Jem and Scout about what took the jury so long to come back with a verdict in Tom Robinson’s trial. This is what Atticus saw as a sign of change.


Answer: The time it took the jury to decide the case.


I hope it helps, Regards.

The correct answer should be the time it took the jury to decide the case

He says that he knew the case was doomed from the start and that Tom would end up being guilty, but the fact that it took them so long to reach the verdict points out that times are changing.