Need some help please XD: Compare and contrast Taft's dollar diplomacy vs Wilson's moral diplomacy.

Thanks!

~ AP U.S. History

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Roosevelt's Corollary was an addition to the Monroe Doctrine that declared the United States could intervene, or use military force to keep peace, in Latin American countries when necessary. Dollar Diplomacy focused on business. Taft believed the United States should invest in other countries to countries. Taft used millions of dollars to help unstable Latin America.


Related Questions

What global event did the United States boycott in 1980 in response to the Soviet Union's invasion of Afghanistan?A. the Winter Olympics in Lake Placid, New York, USAB. the United Nations 50th anniversary celebration in New York, New York, USAC. the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's annual meeting in West Berlin, GermanyD. the Summer Olympics in Moscow, U.S.S.R.
The first 10 amendments to the constitution are called the bill of rights. a. true b. false
Which best describes immigration to the United States between 1820 and 1850? Between 1820 and 1850, nearly half of all European immigrants came from Ireland, which differed from earlier waves. Between 1820 and 1850, nearly a third of European immigrants came from the Netherlands, which differed from earlier waves. Between 1820 and 1850, most immigrants came from southern Europe, specifically Italy, which differed from earlier waves. Between 1820 and 1850, most immigrants were brought from Africa to become enslaved workers, which differed from earlier waves.
If the equation of a circle is (x - 2)^2 + (y - 6)^2 = 4, the center is point (2, 6).True False
Which of the following was NOT a presidential candidate in the 1996 presidential election?a. H. Ross Perot b. Carol Moseley-Braun c. Bill Clinton d. Bob Dole

The beginnings of democracy were seen in the Greek city-state of AthensSpartaRome around 400b. c.

Answers

The correct answer is Athens. The beginnings of democracy were seen in the Greek city-state of Athens around 400 B.C. The democracy that the city of Athens and the territories surrounding the Attica attained was the first democracy known in the world.  

Why did Tecumseh try to unify the Native tribes of North America?A. He felt it was their destiny.
B. He was tired of all the violence in the Indiana Territory.
C. He wanted to set up a powerful trading network to revival that of the Americans.
D. He knew that if the tribes remained divided they would eventually be conquered by the Americans.

Answers

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "D. He knew that if the tribes remained divided they would eventually be conquered by the Americans." Tecumseh try to unify the Native tribes of North America because D. He knew that if the tribes remained divided they would eventually be conquered by the Americans.

1. How did the immigration of the late 1800s differ from earlier immigration? A. Early immigrants came largely from northern and western Europe while immigrants from southern and eastern Europe dominated the late 1800s.
B. Immigration was much easier because of faster processing.
C. Immigration was better organized, so most immigrants had jobs before they arrived and moved quickly to assimilate all over the country.
D. Immigrants in the late 1800s came with greater wealth and more education than earlier immigrants.

2. How did U.S. participation in World War I affect the American civilian population?
A. Children over age 14 had to take jobs because there was a labor shortage.
B. Fewer farmers were able to produce crops, so there were food shortages across the country.
C. Civilians could not keep up with the supply demands of the military.
D. With men drafted to serve in the military, jobs became available for women and minorities.

3. Which was not a cause of the Great Depression?
A. bank crises
B. high taxes on the wealthy
C. stock speculation
D. falling purchasing power

4. How did women play a role in World War II?
A. by producing inspirational radio programs that were broadcast to GIs
B. by starting a letter writing campaign to servicemen
C. by running for political offices that men were unavailable to fill
D. by enlisting in the military and working in civilian jobs that had typically been held by men

Answers

1. The correct answer is A. During earlier immigration, the majority of immigrants came from Western/Northern Europe (for example from Italy), while in the later 1800s, immigration was largely from Southern/Eastern Europe. 2. The correct answer is D. Since men were going in the military, there was a need for jobs to be filled. Thus, women and minorities were able to take jobs that previously weren't available to them. 3. The correct answer is B. There were no high taxes on the wealthy, which actually might have curbed the effects of the Great Depression. 4. The correct answer is D. Similar to question 2, there was a need for women to fill certain jobs because men weren't available. This led to women enlisting in the military to work civilian jobs.

The language of Anna's country has a Turkish influence. Where does Anna live? Ukraine Azerbaijan Belarus Russia

Answers

Azerbaijan.
Azerbaijani language is a Turkic language.

Answer:

Azerbaijan

Explanation:

correct on plato

As a result of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), nothing suspects say can be used against them in court unless __________.

Answers

As a result of Miranda v. Arizona [1966], nothing suspects say can be used against them in court unless they have been advised of their rights. During the case of Miranda versus Arizona, it was established that statements made during interogation by defendants in the police station will be acceptable in courts duriing trials only if the prosecution can show evidence that the defendant was informed of the right to talk to his or her lawyer before and during questioning and of the right against self incrimination before police questioning. And the prosecution should also be able to demonstrate that the defendant understand these rights but voluntarily waived them.

As a result of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), nothing suspects say can be used against them in court unless they are informed about their rights.

Further Explanation:

The decision of the “Miranda versus Arizona” stated that the individuals who are arrested must be notified about their “constitutional rights”, being arrested or questioned. As per the decision, the 5th Amendment act prohibits prosecutors from using suspect speech made at the time of custody and questioning. It is individuals’ legal right to consult an attorney before being interrogated.

The case was considered a drastic change in the “American Criminal law” as it altered the extended the importance of the 5th Amendment. Earlier, it was considered that the act will protect the citizens against the obligation to contempt and confess in the court and after the decision; it became mandatory to inform individuals about their rights. This procedure also referred to as Miranda warning and oral notifications given to the arrestee during custody.

Learn More:

1. in Furman v. Georgia (1972), the supreme court ruled in William Furman’s favor, saying that Georgia had

brainly.com/question/2816742

2. Though the outcomes of the Schenck and New York Times differed, what did these decisions have in common? The government has a heavy burden to prove harm. The government can limit speech that causes harm. The government has unlimited power to limit speech. The government must follow the first amendment.

brainly.com/question/1804110

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Miranda versus Arizona

Subject: History

Keywords: Miranda versus Arizona, constitutional rights, amendment, custody, legal right, attorney, criminal law, court

Some historians argue that Reagan’s treatment of ___________changed the relationship between federal employees and their bosses because it led many employers to follow the president’s example by “strikebreaking.”long haul truckers
food service workers
telephone company operators
air traffic controllers

Answers