Can someone figure out the least to greatest part?
Can someone figure out the least to greatest part? - 1

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: well I know the first one it will be


-0.0001, then -0.001, then -0.01, lastly -0.1

Related Questions

Which of the following ordered pairs could represent the x-intercept of a function?ILL MARK BRAINLIEST!(0, 5)(1, 1)(-2, 4)(9, 0)
If I was cut into 8 equal slices and Ruben is 3/4 of the pie how many slices
The sum of two fractions is 8/9. the difference is 2/9. What are the two fractions?
19-5/2x=34 Please help me now thankyou :)
show how to solve the problem 378 ×6 using place value with regrouping. explain how you knew when to regroup

Which expression is equivalent to 3(5 + 6)?8 + 9
8 + 6
15 + 18
15 + 6

Answers

The third one is correct, because if you distribute, you will get 15 + 18
First solve
3(5 + 6).
5+6=11
Now 3*11=33
So now which of the answers also=33?
8+9=17 so no
8+6=14 so no aswell
15+18=33 therefore this is correct. so your answer is c.
15+6=21 so no

How do you simplify 3:9:15:24

Answers

All of those numbers have a common factor, which is 3. So you divide all of their values by 3.

3:9:15:24
=1:3:5:8

Because the values cannot be divided anymore, this ratio is in it's simplest form.

Is 66 yd larger than 180 ft? Why or why not?

Answers

66 yards is greater, because in the metric system 1 yard= 3 feet. 66 yards is equal to 198 feet. Therefore, making 66 feet greater than 180 feet.
Greater because if 1 yard equals 3 feet then 66 feet equals 198 feet and 198>180

What are the steps of doing 309 times 29

Answers

1. you do 309 times 29
2. then when you got that answer write a zero at the bottom of that answer.
3. then do 309 times 9
4. then add those 2 answers together and you get your answer.

hope this helped!

Help explain this to me: Gerome collected $9.23 more than Manuel? If Cindy still collects 2 times as much as Gerome, ho much money would Cindy collect?

Answers

$18.46
Because gerome collected $9.23 and I mult. 2 times and my answer is: $18.46

Determine if the ordered pair (6, 4) is a solution to the inequality y is greater than negative one half times x plus 7. Yes, because (6, 4) is above the line No, because (6, 4) is below the line Yes, because (6, 4) is on the line No, because (6, 4) is on the line

Answers

Answer:

No,because (6,4) is on the line.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that an inequality equation

y>-(1)/(2)x+7

We have to find that the ordered pair (6,4) is a solution of given inequality or not.

y>-(x)/(2)+7

Substitute x=6

y>-(6)/(2)+7

y>-3+7

y>4

The value of y is greater than 4 not equal to 4.

Therefore, (6,4) is not a solution of given inequality.

No,because (6,4) is on the line.

Answer:

(6,4) is not a solution of y > -x/2 + 7 because (6,4) is on the line

The answer is D.

Hope this helps!