violation of Free Speech.
The Sedition Act was indeed controversial because it restricted Free Speech during World War I. However, it was upheld as constitutional by the Supreme Court, who reasoned that restricting speech during wartime is necessary for national security.
The Sedition Act was passed by the United States Congress in 1918 during World War I. This act made it illegal to speak or write anything critical of the government, the military, or the war effort. It was indeed controversial because it was seen as a violation of Free Speech, which is protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
However, the act was upheld as constitutional by the Supreme Court in the case of Schenck v. United States in 1919. The court reasoned that during times of war, the government has the right to restrict speech that presents a clear and present danger to national security.
So, while the Sedition Act did limit Free Speech rights, it was considered acceptable under the circumstances of wartime. It was repealed in 1920 after the end of World War I and is often seen as an example of the tension between national security and civil liberties.
#SPJ6
Answer:
Rutherford B Hayes is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The hiring and firing of the workers when presidential administrations changed in 19th century was known as spoils system. It began when president Jackson became the president in 1829. His supporters thought it necessary to reform the federal government. His opponent opponent considered it to be a corrupt be a corrupt method for political patronage. The opponents liked to call it spoils system. The phrase was first used by Senator William L. Marcy in his speech. President Hayes wanted to reform the civil service appointments which were based on spoils system and tried to change it with merit system.
diffusion
osmosis
homeostasis
Answer:
D: Homeostasis
Explanation: