in brown versus the Board of Education the Supreme Court overturned the prettiest woman in Plessy v ferguson that separate but equal was constitutional so long as equal accommondations were provided what constitutial amendment was interpreted in both of these cases

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: yes, this is true. In brown vs board of education of Topeka, the case got a legal victory due to the fact that it wasn't separate but equal, as the girl had to walk 20 blocks - a few miles - to get to her school, as she attends a black school. white people were able to get to schools near them, which is totally unfair. so the supreme court said 'separate but equal' is unconstitutional.

Related Questions

In addition to factory work, many women in the USSR were employed
Which central government agency was responsible to provide news on the war?
Which tribe crossed the gulf of mexico to get to the indian territory
Who produced large quantities of steel very efficiently by buying and controlling iron ore deposits, steel mills, and railroads? A.Alexander Graham Bell B.Andrew Carnegie C.Thomas Edison D.Jean Lenoir
If Joseph McCarthy put you on the “black list,” that means he probably thought you were a _____. Nazi war criminal communist civil rights leader friend of the government

Which sequence places these laws in the correctchronological order?
(1) Code of Hammurabi → Justinian Code →
Napoleonic Code → Twelve Tables
(2) Justinian Code → Twelve Tables →
Napoleonic Code → Code of Hammurabi
(3) Code of Hammurabi → Twelve Tables →
Justinian Code → Napoleonic Code
(4) Twelve Tables → Napoleonic Code → Code
of Hammurabi → Justinian Code

Answers

"(3) Code of Hammurabi → Twelve Tables →Justinian Code → Napoleonic Code" is the correct order, since Hammurabi'd Code was by far the first to be implemented. 

"(3) Code of Hammurabi → Twelve Tables →Justinian Code → Napoleonic Code" is the correct order, since Hammurabi'd Code was by far the first to be implemented.

Who could use the headright system to acquire land for himself and work growing crops?

Answers

Final answer:

The headright system in Virginia allowed anyone who could pay their own passage to the New World to earn land. This included individuals, families, and indentured servants who had completed their terms of service. The land could then be used for farming, often tobacco.

Explanation:

The headright system was a system implemented by the Virginia Company to attract more settlers to the New World. Any individual person who paid his own way to Virginia would receive fifty acres of land. Additionally, for every indentured servant or family member brought, an additional fifty acres were granted. Therefore, anyone, including indentured servants who completed their service, could use the headright system to acquire land for themselves and grow crops. This was a powerful incentive for English migrants to take the perilous journey to the New World.

Besides, indentured servants who completed their service often began new lives as tobacco planters, taking advantage of the headright system. However, not only individuals but also larger companies that could afford to bring more people received essentially large tracts of land, changing the socio-economic structure of the New World.

Learn more about headright system here:

brainly.com/question/13481206

#SPJ12

Who lived in china for twenty years

Answers

dont quote me but i believe that it is Marco Polo

marco polo lived there

Why were so few violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act brought to court?

Answers

The main reason why so few violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act were brought to court was because the government was slightly corrupt, with some people in charge of prosecuting these cases "in bed" with those breaking the law. 

Before the arrival of Europeans in New Zealand, the Maori _____.A.were made up of many groups

B.lived in peace with other nations

C.had few traditional customs

D.considered themselves a nation (gradpoint)

Answers

Before the arrival of Europeans in New Zealand, the Maori were made up of many groups, just like the American Indians.

Answer:

A.were made up of many groups

Explanation:

The Maoris or Māori (Māori in the Maori language) are a Polynesian ethnic group that reached the islands of New Zealand, in the South Pacific Ocean, possibly from islands further north such as Rarotonga or Tongatapu.

The first to visit New Zealand were probably Spanish. In 1525, there are theories that point out that Juan Sebastián Elcano arrived on the islands and the crew procreated with the natives. There are Maori words that come from Spanish. This surprising discovery reinforces the theory. In the beginning of the 1780s the Maoris had encounters with whaling sailors; some were also crewmen of foreign ships. The continuous stream of escaping prisoners and other deserters on Australian ships exposes the indigenous population of New Zealand to external influences.

In 1830 it was estimated that the number of Europeans living among the Maori was about 2,000. The status of the newcomers varied from slave to high-level counselor; from prisoner to others who left European culture and identified themselves as Maori. When Pomare commanded a detachment of war against Titore in 1838, he had 132 mercenaries among his warriors. Frederick Edward Maning, one of the first settlers, wrote two books that will become classics of New Zealand literature: Old New Zealand and the History of the War in the North of New Zealand against the Chief Heke.

Following the British intervention, New Zealand became a British colony by signing the Treaty of Waitangi in 1840. To this day, this treaty is being discussed and remains the source of divisions and resentments for many. In 1861, the discovery of gold deposits in territories that the treaty accepted as Maori, meant a new attack on the rights of the aborigines, who responded with a heroic resistance called the Maori War. The European conquest greatly reduced the native population, if by 1840 it was estimated at 100,000 natives and 2,000 whites on the islands, in 1896 there were 42,000 natives and more than 700,000 settlers.

Why was the Continental Congress unable to provide the army with proper equipment?

Answers

Answer:

The Continental Congress was unable to provide the army with proper equipment because it couldn't levy taxes, as it was reserved only to the states.

Explanation:

The Continental Congress was ruled by the Articles of the Confederation, the first government charter of the United States.

The Articles supported the Continental Army and allowed the thirteen states to form a united front before the European powers. However, as a tool to build an effective government in times of war, it was a failure. Congress could make decisions, but did not have the power to apply them. Perhaps, the biggest setback was the requirement of unanimous approval of the 13 States to modify the articles. At the same time, the most important power that Congress lacked was the power to collect taxes: it could only request money from the States. These, for their part, did not always comply with the demands and Congress did not have the necessary funds for its operation, especially in the military, where due to this situation the Army was without the necessary provisions and weapons.

The answer is that the Congress could not levy taxes.