In “My Father Sits in the Dark,” the speaker says, “But I could not understand it. How could it be restful to sit alone in an uncomfortable chair far into the night, in darkness?” What light does Rita Dove’s poem “Daystar” shed on the father’s perspective?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The light that shed on the father's perspective in Rita Dove's poem "Daystar" with the line "But I could not understand it. How could it be restful to sit alone in an uncomfortable chair far into the night, in darkness?" would be that the speaker's father does not worry about anything when he is alone or in solitude. 

Related Questions

How do you pronounce 'niche'?
Add -ance or -ence to the following word. You may use a dictionary.suffersufferencesufferance
At which stage of the plot structure do conflicts build in intensity and complication?
The word “awaken” in the third paragraph most nearly meansA rise up B stop sleeping C generate art D stir up E incite anger Read the following passage carefully before you choose your answers. (The following is an excerpt from A Man of Letters as a Man of Business by William Dean Howells.) I think that every man ought to work for his living, without exception, and that when he has once avouched his willingness to work, society should provide him with work and warrant him a living. I do not think any man ought to live by an art. A man’s art should be his privilege, when he has proven his fitness to exercise it, and has otherwise earned his daily bread; and its results should be free to all. There is an instinctive sense of this, even in the midst of the grotesque confusion of our economic being; people feel that there is something profane, something impious, in taking money for a picture, or a poem, or a statue. Most of all, the artist himself feels this. He puts on a bold front with the world, to be sure, and brazens it out as business; but he knows very well that there is something false and vulgar in it; and that the work which cannot be truly priced in money cannot be truly paid in money. He can, of course, say that the priest takes money for reading the marriage service, for christening the new-born babe, and for saying the last office for the dead; that the physician sells healing; that justice itself is paid for; and that he is merely a party to the thing that is and must be. He can say that, as the thing is, unless he sells his art he cannot live, that society will leave him to starve if he does not hit its fancy in a picture, or a poem, or a statue; and all this is bitterly true. He is, and he must be, only too glad if there is a market for his wares. Without a market for his wares he must perish, or turn to making something that will sell better than pictures, or poems, or statues. All the same, the sin and the shame remain, and the averted eye sees them still, with its inward vision. Many will make believe otherwise, but I would rather not make believe otherwise; and in trying to write of Literature as Business I am tempted to begin by saying that Business is the opprobrium of Literature. Literature is at once the most intimate and the most articulate of the arts. It cannot impart its effect through the senses or the nerves as the other arts can; it is beautiful only through the intelligence; it is the mind speaking to the mind; until it has been put into absolute terms, of an invariable significance, it does not exist at all. It cannot awaken this emotion in one, and that in another; if it fails to express precisely the meaning of the author, it says nothing, and is nothing. So that when a poet has put his heart, much or little, into a poem, and sold it to a magazine, the scandal is greater than when a painter has sold a picture to a patron, or a sculptor has modeled a statue to order. These are artists less articulate and less intimate than the poet; they are more exterior to their work. They are less personally in it. If it will serve to make my meaning a little clearer we will suppose that a poet has been crossed in love, or has suffered some real sorrow, like the loss of a wife or child. He pours out his broken heart in verse that shall bring tears of sacred sympathy from his readers, and an editor pays him a hundred dollars for the right of bringing his verse to their notice. It is perfectly true that the poem was not written for these dollars, but it is perfectly true that it was sold for them. The poet must use his emotions to pay his bills; he has no other means. Society does not propose to pay his bills for him. Yet, and at the end of the ends, the unsophisticated witness finds the transaction ridiculous, finds it repulsive, finds it shabby. Somehow he knows that if our huckstering civilization did not at every moment violate the eternal fitness of things, the poet’s song would have been given to the world, and the poet would have been cared for by the whole human brotherhood, as any man should be who does the duty that every man owes it.
A carpenter cut a board into three pieces one piece was 2 5/6 ft long with second piece was 3 1/6 ft long the third piece was 3 1/6 feet long how long was the board

Which sentence uses a verb that agrees with its compound subject? A.The Wilsons or Mr. Burton have a snow shovel.

B.Soccer and football is played on this field.

C.Jason or his brothers has made the mess.

D.A salad or vegetables come with the meal.

Answers

D, because when you have two nouns, the verb you should use goes for the noun closest to the verb.

Do you think guns should be illegal in the United States and why?
Give two reasons why.

Answers

No, guns should be legal in the United States.

Banning guns doesn't work. Hitler banned guns, Zedong banned guns, and guess what? They killed millions and millions of people after they banned them. How are WE suppose to stand up for ourselves if guns are banned? Most people feel safe with a gun. Guns are not the problem, it's the person using them the incorrect way. The best thing to do nowadays is to teach everybody to use a gun the CORRECT WAY. Not to shoot humans, dogs/cats. 

Banning guns will not stop crimes, or stop people from hurting each other. There are knives, swords, etc. 
I think that banning guns would make the US safer because then the criminals would have to turn them in and the gangsters would have nothing to shoot each other with. I also think that there should be security cameras and full body scanners everywhere in public places to prevent mass shootings. I think that only the police and the president and the secret service should be allowed to have guns because they work for the government and the government would never abuse it's power.

What does the irony in these excerpts from “In Another Country” by Ernest Hemingway convey?"The doctor came up to the machine where I was sitting and said: "What did you like best to do before the war? Did you practice a sport?"

I said: "Yes, football."

"Good," he said. "You will be able to play football again better than ever."

My knee did not bend and the leg dropped straight from the knee to the ankle without a calf, and the machine was to bend the knee and make it move as riding a tricycle.

In the next machine was a major who had a little hand like a baby's. He winked at me when the doctor examined his hand, which was between two leather straps that bounced up and down and flapped the stiff fingers, and said: "And will I too play football, captain-doctor?" He had been a very great fencer, and before the war the greatest fencer in Italy."

A.The doctor, who is supposed to be sympathetic and helpful to his patients, does not really understand their suffering.

B.Modern technology aided war efforts by providing horrific weapons, but it couldn’t help the soldiers
.
C.The war is ruthless and took away the things most important to the identity and happiness of both men.

D.Despite facing the horrors of war, the soldiers are still able to keep a sense of humor.

Answers

Answer: The answer is C: The war is ruthless and took away the things most important to the identity and happiness of both men.

Explanation: I just took the test on plato and got a 5/5. Hope I could help!! :)

Final answer:

The irony in Hemingway's 'In Another Country' reflects the war's ruthlessness by showing how it robbed essential parts of the soldiers' identities and happiness. The grim reality contrasts sharply with the doctor's optimistic assurances.

Explanation:

The irony in these excerpts from 'In Another Country' by Ernest Hemingway refers most closely to statement C: The war is ruthless and took away the things most important to the identity and happiness of both men. The doctor's optimism and reassurances seem to contrast dramatically with the physical reality faced by the soldiers, hence the irony.

Despite the innovative machinery and the doctor's promise, it is unlikely that the soldier will be able to play football as before, and the major most likely won't ever fence again. Symbolizing how the war took away critical aspects of their identities and happiness, this irony brings a powerful sense of loss and injustice.

Learn more about Irony in Hemingway's 'In Another Country' here:

brainly.com/question/33537026

#SPJ3

According to research, exposure to a certain type of bacteria called mycobacterium vaccae which is found in soil can help increase serotonin levels in the body. Serotonin is a chemical found in the brain. It can boost a person's mood and decrease anxiety. This same chemical can help people better process information in their brains. Just by being outside, our bodies can breathe in this bacteria. Research has shown that this bacteria appeared to boost the mood in laboratory mice. Additionally, the mice that were given this bacteria in their diet were able to move through a maze twice as quickly as mice that were not given this bacteria. These same mice also behaved less anxiously than the other mice. Based on information from the passage, the reader can tell that

Answers

Final answer:

The passage discusses how exposure to Mycobacterium Vacce, a type of bacteria in soil, can increase serotonin levels in the body, boost mood, decrease anxiety, and potentially enhance cognitive ability. The presence of certain microbes in our bodies is also essential to our health, assisting in digestion, nutrient production, protection from pathogenic microbes, and immune functioning.

Explanation:

The passage discusses the properties and effects of a type of bacteria called Mycobacterium Vaccae. This bacteria, which exists in soils, can evidently increase the levels of serotonin, a brain chemical that positively affects mood and decreases anxiety. Some studies showed that the bacteria improved cognitive ability and reduced anxiety in mice, suggesting that it could have similar impacts on humans. The information also indicates that the presence or absence of certain microbes can affect the proper functioning and health of our bodies.

It's fascinating to learn that bacteria can increase the fertility of soils, transform plant substances into humus, and produce substances such as antibiotics. An interesting point is that low levels of these antibiotics in the environment can cause bacteria to mutate and become antibiotic-resistant.

Our bodies also host microbes that assist in digestion, nutrient production, protection from pathogenic microbes, and immune training. The equilibrium of these microbes is essential for our health, and the disruption of this balance can lead to illnesses and other health complications. Therefore, exposure to beneficial bacteria like Mycobacterium Vaccae may be crucial for maintaining a healthy internal ecosystem.

Learn more about Mycobacterium Vaccae here:

brainly.com/question/39941270

#SPJ12

How old was Harriet when the story opened?

thirteen
twenty
twenty-eight

Answers

Harriet was twenty-eight.

>>>>Harriet Tubman was an American bondwoman who escaped from slavery in the South to become a leading abolitionist prior to the American Civil War. She was born in Maryland in 1820, and successfully escaped in 1849. 
>
 She led hundreds to freedom in the North as the most famous "conductor" on the Underground Railroad.

Answer:

im pretty sure the answer is either 13 or 20

Explanation:

Compare drama to other literary genres. For example, how does drama compare to film? Give specific examples to support your answer.

Answers

Drama is not filled with gossiping or too much over reactions, but if you look at mysteries, they're all about suspension etc.

The primary objective of all literary genres, including drama, film, prose, and poetry, is to present a story or concept that explores or explains the truth about human experience to the audience or readers. The common elements between these genres are plot, theme, setting, characters, and dialogue.

Dramas are written to be performed in front of an audience, whereas prose, poetry, and short stories are usually meant to be read. Sometimes poems, short stories, and excerpts from prose texts are recited before a group of people (such as at readings at a bookstore or literary event), but that is unlike performing dramas. Dramas also differ from films. While drama is a live performance of a story in front of an audience, a film is a recorded performance of a story that is screened at a movie theater or on TV.