How was the closeness of the 2000 and 2002 elections reflected in control of Congress

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "such strategic use of campaign money is an essential tool for the party leaderships." the closeness of the 2000 and 2002 election reflected in control of Congress is that such strategic use of campaign money is an essential tool for the party leaderships.

Related Questions

How did Chinese cultures change durning the warring states period
Describe the war in the Pacific. Why was the Battle of Midway such an important battle in the Pacific?Why did the United States employ the Island Hopping strategy?How did the United States view the people of Japan? Why did the United States decide to use a nuclear bomb on Japan?
How did new weapons and technology change the course of war during World War I?
In 1679, New Hampshire was established as a _______ colony
Which of the following was an immediate result of passage of the Fifteenth Amendment? African American women finally gained the right to vote. African Americans were elected to all levels of government. Grandfather clauses helped African Americans in the voting booth. Poll taxes were outlawed because they were discriminatory.

One unique feature of the presidential election of 2000 between George W. Bush and Al Gore is that (1) the Supreme Court played an important role in the final outcome (2) no third-party candidate was on the ballot (3) both candidates had previously served as vice president (4) the electoral votes in Florida were divided between the candidates

Answers

The Unique feature was that even long after the election, it was not clear who had won, and the crucial decision depended on the re-count of votes in Florida.

This re-count was stopped by the Supreme court and as a result, George Bush won (based on the previously announced number of votes)

So the answer is:
 the Supreme Court played an important role in thefinal outcome


Which of the following is not an authoritarian form of government? A. Direct democracy B. Totalitarianism C. Dictatorship D. Absolute monarchy

Answers

"Direct democracy" is the one form of government among the following choices given in the question that is not an authoritarian form of government. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option or option "A". I hope that this is the answer that has come to your help.

Direct democracy is not an authoritarian form of government.

Further Explanation

Democracy  

  • Democracy refers to a system of government in which the citizens exercise their power directly.
  • In democracy government citizens have power and the right to elect representatives who will in turn create a government for the entire nation.

Major types of democracy

Representative democracy  

  • This type of democracy is also known as indirect democracy where citizens vote for a few people who will represent them in parliament.
  • This type of democracy aims on protecting the rights of the majority people in a state and also that of the minorities.

Direct democracy  

  • In this type of democracy, citizens exercise their power directly by voting for policies and important decisions without representatives or houses of parliament.
  • In this type of democracy the citizens decide the fate of their own country by voting on issues. Laws to be passed by the government have to be voted for by the people.

Authoritarian democracy  

  • A type of democracy where the elites are the only people who are part of the parliamentary process.
  • Citizens are allowed to vote for their chosen candidate, however, regular citizens cannot participate in the elections.

Types of authoritarian form of government

Absolute monarchy  

  • This is a type of government where monarch rules without being guided by any laws or a constitution.  

Totalitarianism

  • Totalitarianism is a type of government in which a single individual has absolute control over all citizens and government aspects and other individuals and parties are prohibited.

Dictatorship

  • It is a form of government that is characterized by rule of a small group of people or one person with no checks and balances on power.

Keywords: Democracy, direct democracy, authoritarian democracy, absolute monarchy

Learn more about:  

Level: High school

Subject: History

Topic: Government and forms of Democracy

Sub-topics: Types of Democracy  

The development of an atomic bomb by the United States did which of these? (5 points)A. pressured German leaders to surrender

B. increased tensions between Truman and Stalin

C. worried the leaders of France and Great Britain

D. led Stalin to postpone a Soviet invasion of Japan


The statement below was made by Robert H. Shumard, a crewman of the B-29 that dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima:
"Nobody actually wants to cause the destruction we caused. But it was through a necessity rather than a wanton type of destruction. It was something that had to be done."
With which principle associated with the Nuremberg Trials would Shumard agree?

A. A soldier must always follow orders.

B. War criminals must be put on trial for their misdeeds.

C. The destruction of towns and cities constitutes a war crime.

D. Individuals are accountable for their actions even during war.

I am not sure what the answer to these questions are, any help would be appreciated!

Answers

The first one is B since it started the Arm's Race between the US and the USSR
The second one is A, since the soldiers didn't want distruction, they wanted them to surender before, but they did as they were told. 
Question 1: B
Question 2: A

I hope I helped!

The Fourth Amendment states "The right of the people to be secure . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated. . . ." Pretend that you were a justice for the Supreme Court of Ohio. What, if anything, would you find unreasonable in the search of Mapp's house? Explain.

Answers

Answer:

All evidence found would have to be thrown out because her rights were infringed. The police had no right to enter or search her home.

Final answer:

If I were a justice for the Supreme Court of Ohio, I would find the search of Mapp's house to be unreasonable for a few reasons.

Explanation:

If I were a justice for the Supreme Court of Ohio, I would find the search of Mapp's house to be unreasonable for a few reasons. First, the search was conducted without a valid search warrant. The Fourth Amendment requires that searches be based on probable cause and authorized by a warrant, unless there are specific exceptions. In this case, the police did not have a warrant and there were no exigent circumstances.

Second, the evidence obtained during the search was a result of an illegal search and seizure. The exclusionary rule, established by the Supreme Court, states that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in a criminal trial. Since the search of Mapp's house was conducted without a warrant, any evidence obtained during that search would likely be considered inadmissible.

Lastly, the search of Mapp's house was conducted in a manner that violated her privacy rights. The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, and the search of Mapp's house without a warrant or probable cause would likely be considered an invasion of her privacy.

Learn more about unreasonable search and seizure here:

brainly.com/question/33378876

#SPJ2

Who needs to be educated in a nation with a monarchyPLEASE I NEED HELP AS FAST AS POSSIBLE!!

Answers

Answer:

like how

Explanation:

Answer: what exactly do u mean by that?

Explanation:

Pls explain.

1. What was the main cause of the American Revolution? Why were the colonists fighting the British?

Answers

The American Revolution was principally caused by colonial opposition to British attempts to impose greater control over the colonies and to make them repay the crown for its defense of them during the French and Indian War (1754–63).