In which sentence does the verb agree with the subject? A.Somehow, three pennies were blocking the drain.

B.Many months has passed since our last visit.

C.Three dollars are the price of this pumpkin.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: From the stated options above, the sentence wherein the verb agrees with the subject is:

A.Somehow, three pennies were blocking the drain.

In this sentence, the three pennies are considered as a number of items therefore must take a plural verb. The other two options are wrong because in the second option, the indefinite pronoun "many" with the plural form of the noun modified must take plural verb "have" and the third option "three dollars" is a value of money so it must take singular verb "is".

Related Questions

Which is a run-on sentence? A. There were only a few dancers on the floor, the couple soon became the center of attention. B. A worn yellow quilt was lying at the foot of the antique bed, a gift from their grandmother. C. If you start saving now, you will be able to buy a car sooner. D. His helmet bore the number of the firehouse, which was more than 100 years old.
Which sentence is written in the passive voice?A. My friends helped me paint the house. B. I was helped by my friends when I painted the house.
I do not get it bc thar is 4 not 3
Which form of the adverb is underlined in the sentence? I looked more carefully and noticed the secret message. A. superlative B. positive C. comparative
Give the original language from which this term was derivedrazor Old English Greek Hebrew Latin Old French

Which sentence is punctuated correctly? A.
Igor Stravinsky composed the music for the 1913 ballet "The Rite of Spring."

B.
The 1998 book "A Walk in the Woods" is one of Bill Bryson's most popular works.

C.
Edgar Degas, a nineteenth-century impressionist artist, painted this lovely work titled "The Rehearsal."

D.
Every student in the class enjoyed the book To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee.

Answers

The sentence that is punctuated correctly is option A. Igor Stravinsky composed the music for the 1913 ballet "The Rite of Spring." This sentence is correctly punctuated because the words "The Rite of Spring" is enclosed in quotation marks because it is a title of a song. Song titles should be enclosed in quotation marks, while book titles and works of art should be italicized.

Which of the following are forms that were popular before the invention of the novel? select all that apply. drama
epic poetry
coming-of-age-tale
stream-of-consciousness story

Answers

Answer:

  • Stream-of-consciousness story

Explanation:

Stream of consciousness is a technique for portrayal that depicts happenings in the stream of considerations in the psyches of the characters.  

This technique is also known as "interior monolog," where the individual manners of thinking of a character, related to his or her activities, are depicted as a monolog that tends to the character itself.

Answer:

Stream-of-consciousness story

Explanation:

Where is the verb in this sentence: We could never have moved that tree by ourselves .

Answers


could have moved is the verb phrase used in this sentence

Which of the following are italicized in MLA format?Book titles

Periodical titles

Almanacs

All of the above

None of the above

Answers

Book titles would be the correct answer

Tamba simplified 4(3x-1). Describe the error. 4(3x-1) = 12x-1

Answers

You multiply the -1 by 4 as well giving you the answer 12x-4

The error she made is when she did distributive property, she did this:

4(3x) is 12x. That is correct.

Then she did this:

4(-1)= -1

that is the error. 4 times -1 is -4, not one. The actual answer is 12x-4

<Hope it helped!❤️~>

the latter. In choosing it, I hoped for greater gain than loss; but of this I was not entirely confident... Yours truly, A. Lincoln Use context to determine the meaning of the phrase in bold

Answers

This question is incomplete. Here´s the complete question.

(LC)Letter to a Citizen of Kentucky, an excerpt  

Executive Mansion, Washington,  

April 4, 1864.  

A. G. Hodges, Esq., Frankfort, Ky.  

My Dear Sir:  

        You ask me to put in writing the substance of what I verbally stated the other day, in your presence, to Governor Bramlette and Senator Dixon. It was about as follows:  

        I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong nothing is wrong. I cannot remember when I did not so think and feel; and yet I have never understood that the Presidency conferred upon me an unrestricted right to act officially in this judgment and feeling. It was in the oath I took that I would to the best of my ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. I could not take the office without taking the oath. Nor was it in my view that I might take the oath to get power, and break the oath in using the power.  

        I understood, too, that in ordinary civil administration this oath even forbade me to practically indulge my primary abstract judgment on the moral question of slavery. I had publicly declared this many times and in many ways; and I aver that, to this day I have done no official act in mere deference to my abstract judgment and feeling on slavery. I did understand, however, that my oath to preserve the Constitution to the best of my ability imposed upon me the duty of preserving, by every indispensable means, that government, that nation, of which that Constitution was the organic law. Was it possible to lose the nation, and yet preserve the Constitution?  

        By general law, life and limb must be protected; yet often a limb must be amputated to save a life, but a life is never wisely given to save a limb. I felt that measures, otherwise unconstitutional, might become lawful by becoming indispensable to the preservation of the Constitution through the preservation of the nation. Right or wrong, I assumed this ground, and now avow it. I could not feel that to the best of my ability I had even tried to preserve the Constitution, if, to save slavery, or any minor matter, I should permit the wreck of government, country, and Constitution altogether.  

        When, early in the war, General Fremont attempted military emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not then think it an indispensable necessity. When, a little later, General Cameron, then Secretary of War, suggested the arming of the blacks, I objected, because I did not yet think it an indispensable necessity. When, still later, General Hunter attempted military emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not yet think the indispensable necessity had come. When, in March and May and July, 1862, I made earnest and successive appeals to the Border States to favor compensated emancipation, I believed the indispensable necessity for military emancipation and arming the blacks would come, unless averted by that measure. They declined the proposition; and I was, in my best judgment, driven to the alternative of either surrendering the Union, and with it the Constitution, or of laying strong hand upon the colored element. I chose the latter. In choosing it, I hoped for greater gain than loss; but of this I was not entirely confident…  

Yours truly,  

A. Lincoln  

Use context to determine the meaning of the phrase in bold.

I have ascertained that

I can confirm that

I will instruct you that

I hope to learn that

Answer: I can confirm that

Explanation:

Aver means to positively declare something. It has the "truth" root, so it essentially refers to "confirm as true". We aver something that we're sure of.

Lincoln explains that he knows his political position doesn´t allow him to impose his ideas on slavery. He states that he can positively confirm that he hasn´t done that because even if he made his position about slavery publicly known, he hasn´t made any official act to end slavery by force.

Answer:

I beleive it is D, but it might also be B. I'm taking the test right now.

Full question:

(LC)Letter to a Citizen of Kentucky, an excerpt

Executive Mansion, Washington,

April 4, 1864.

A. G. Hodges, Esq., Frankfort, Ky.

My Dear Sir:

        You ask me to put in writing the substance of what I verbally stated the other day, in your presence, to Governor Bramlette and Senator Dixon. It was about as follows:

        I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong nothing is wrong. I cannot remember when I did not so think and feel; and yet I have never understood that the Presidency conferred upon me an unrestricted right to act officially in this judgment and feeling. It was in the oath I took that I would to the best of my ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. I could not take the office without taking the oath. Nor was it in my view that I might take the oath to get power, and break the oath in using the power.

        I understood, too, that in ordinary civil administration this oath even forbade me to practically indulge my primary abstract judgment on the moral question of slavery. I had publicly declared this many times and in many ways; and I aver that, to this day I have done no official act in mere deference to my abstract judgment and feeling on slavery. I did understand, however, that my oath to preserve the Constitution to the best of my ability imposed upon me the duty of preserving, by every indispensable means, that government, that nation, of which that Constitution was the organic law. Was it possible to lose the nation, and yet preserve the Constitution?

        By general law, life and limb must be protected; yet often a limb must be amputated to save a life, but a life is never wisely given to save a limb. I felt that measures, otherwise unconstitutional, might become lawful by becoming indispensable to the preservation of the Constitution through the preservation of the nation. Right or wrong, I assumed this ground, and now avow it. I could not feel that to the best of my ability I had even tried to preserve the Constitution, if, to save slavery, or any minor matter, I should permit the wreck of government, country, and Constitution altogether.

        When, early in the war, General Fremont attempted military emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not then think it an indispensable necessity. When, a little later, General Cameron, then Secretary of War, suggested the arming of the blacks, I objected, because I did not yet think it an indispensable necessity. When, still later, General Hunter attempted military emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not yet think the indispensable necessity had come. When, in March and May and July, 1862, I made earnest and successive appeals to the Border States to favor compensated emancipation, I believed the indispensable necessity for military emancipation and arming the blacks would come, unless averted by that measure. They declined the proposition; and I was, in my best judgment, driven to the alternative of either surrendering the Union, and with it the Constitution, or of laying strong hand upon the colored element. I chose the latter. In choosing it, I hoped for greater gain than loss; but of this I was not entirely confident...

Yours truly,

A. Lincoln

Use context to determine the meaning of the words in bold.

Laws that relate to science

Basic principles and rules

Questionable decisions

Rules of society