A company can raise money by doing all but which of the following?A. Issuing bonds
B. Conducting an initial public offering
C. Taking a loan
D. Providing stock options to executives

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: D. Providing stock options to executives is not a way for the company to raise money.   Companies will offer stock options to executives--and also, in many cases, to employees--as a way of building loyalty to the company and providing incentives to their executives and employees in ways other than raising salaries.

The other options -- issuing bonds, conducting and initial public offering, or taking a loan will all provide funds for the company to develop its business.  

Let's look at an initial public offering as an example.  A private company goes public and issues issues stock to raise funds to expand the business. That may mean building more factories or stores, or developing new products, etc.  An example would be the story of The Home Depot stores. The company was founded in 1978, and had just three stores in Georgia in 1981 when it went public and issued stock. They used money raised through the initial public offering to expand their business.  Today, The Home Depot has over 2,200 stores in three countries.
Answer 2
Answer: A company can raise money by doing all by Providing stock options to executives. >A company can raise money for itself by doing a lot of things. It can acquire more investors or sell stock or inventory. It cannot provide stock options to its own executives.

Related Questions

This political cartoon, The Open Road the people symbolize
President Obama _____. A.called for the end of American combat operations in Iraq B.signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act into law C.created a legislative agenda that included health care reform D.established the Office of Homeland Security to combat terrorism
Who was Margret Murray Washington married to?
Identify the traces of the populist party within the platform planks of the contemporary democratic party
How did many Americans view President Wilson’s goal of establishing an international peacekeeping organization after World War I?A. They supported it because they wanted the United States to get more involved in world affairs. B. They opposed it because they feared that Wilson had made too many compromises in the Senate to get it passed. C. They supported it because they believed it would give the United States more prestige around the world. D. They opposed it because isolationist sentiment was growing, and many people feared American involvement in another war.

To more fully understand the context of the letter above what would you, as a historian, need?

Answers

Primary sources are sources that were created during the historical period that you are studying. Just about anything that existed or was created during that time period can count as a primary source — a speech, census records, a newspaper, a letter, a diary entry, a song, a painting, a photograph, a film, an article of clothing, a building, a landscape, etc. Primary sources are documents, objects, and other sources that provide us with a first-hand accountof what life was like in the past.

Determining what is a primary source and what isn’t can get tricky — what do you do, for example, with a recent recording of your aunt talking about her experiences during the Civil Rights Movement? It wasn’t created at the time, but it’s still a first-hand account. Eyewitness accounts like oral history interviews and memoirs or autobiographies, even those recorded recently, are considered primary sources because the memories that eyewitnesses reveal in those sources were created in that historical time period, even if those memories were not talked about or formally recorded until much later.

It can get even trickier. The movie Gone With The Wind is not a primary source about the Civil War and Reconstruction, even though it is a movie about that time period. It wasn’t created during that time period and it is purely a work of fiction and therefore it can’t provide us with any credible information about that era. It could, however, be used as a primary source for the Great Depression since the movie and the book on which it was based were both produced during that period. A fictional film produced in 1930s can tell us nothing credible about the 1860s, but it could certainly tell us a lot about what people were interested in during the 1930s — their fantasy world, their dreams, their view of history, and their tastes in film. If you were writing a paper about American culture in the Depression, this would be an excellent primary source, but for a paper about slavery, it would be horrible!


"You've been called in to troubleshoot a connectivity problem on a newly installed Windows Server system. The system is operating well and is able to communicate with other systems on the local network. However, it's unable to access any systems on other segments of the corporate network. You suspect that the system's default gateway parameter hasn't been configured or may be configured incorrectly. Which of the following utilities are you MOST likely to use to view the system's default gateway information? A. Ping B. Tracert C. Ipconfig D. Netstat"

Answers

Answer: C) ipconfig

Explanation:

What did Daniel Shay do in response to the increase in taxes

Answers

Answer:

Daniel Shays (c. 1747 – September 29, 1825) was an American soldier, revolutionary and farmer famous for being one of the leaders and namesake of Shays' Rebellion, a populist uprising against controversial debt collection and tax policies in Massachusetts in 1786 and 1787.

Explanation:

What was true about African Americans in the military?Most African Americans were deployed to the battle front.

African Americans were included in the army in 1940.

Few African American troops were segregated.

Most African Americans were deployed to support roles.

Answers

D. Most African Americans were deployed to support roles

Because 
the military was not officially de-segregated until after World War II. 

Answer:

Most African Americans were deployed to support roles.

Explanation:

for plato/edmentum users.

Public Domain What was one negative effect of posters like this one? Americans began to find Japanese Americans funny rather than threatening. Japanese Americans experienced increased discrimination. More people on the homefront rallied behind the Japanese cause. People grew reluctant to believe government propaganda.

Answers

One negative effect of posters like this is that Japanese Americans experienced increased discrimination. Propaganda is used to influence people psychologically. With this device social perceptions may be alter.

A great example of this is also the propaganda used in the WWII, through which the Americans sought to change American perceptions of the Japanese.



Propaganda posters had a negative effect on the JapaneseAmericans. They experienced increased discrimination because of these posters.

How were these pseudo-scientific theories used to justify racist policies and imperialist expansion

Answers

since you didn't specify one, I'll give you a little challenge: global climate change. 

yes...this is not a "historical" answer, but please bear with me as you may learn something quite a bit more useful than a history lesson... 

climate change is a very trendy topic now....and many of its proponents are absolutely convinced of its "science".. 

...however, for many this absoute faith in the "science" translates all-too-easily into an absolute faith in the righteousness of the proposed "solutions"... 

...for example, president obama recently celebrated his participation in a "landmark" international accord to combat climate change... many of his supporters lauded him for "taking a stand against global corporations and their exploitation of people and natural resources..." 

great.... right? 

this agreement contained two provisions that seemingly went unnoticed.... first, nations considered "developing" will not have to comply with the strict emmisions restrictions... second, all nations are required to designate a certain percentage of their natural forests & jungles as untouchable "preserves." 

sounds good.... right? please think it through... 

the agreement gives these nations the authority to displace any indigenous peoples who just happen to call those "preserves" home... over a million people are expected to be kicked off their ancestral lands in DR Congo alone. 

keep in mind that most of these people will be illiterate hunter-gatherers ... how do you think they will manage to support themselves? 

guess what? because those nations will not be required to meet environmental standards, a bunch of new factories, mines and refineries are sure to open up there....and they'll have all the cheap labor they could ever need! Yay! 

and guess who owns those businesses? that's right, mega-corporations...guess who those corporations support? that's right... the very politicians who signed the climate change deal! 

so you were asking about how "pseudo science" supports/justifies exploitation and imperialism? well....as the old rhyme goes: the wheels on the bus keep on going 'round and 'round... don't they?