the answer is A-the number zero (hope i helped!)
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
It is true that Nationalism is when a person supports their own countries interests, especially when it comes to competing against another country. I think Nationalism contributed to the onset of World War I in that this sentiment create so much hate against other countries and confronted them.
Nationalism fomented a deep love and passion for a country to the extreme of patriotism. After the unification of Germany in 1871, nationalism invaded the sentiment of the Germans. However, nationalism was taken to the extreme with the outbreak of war in the Balkans region by the Slavic inhabitants.
Indeed, this issue was part of the assassination of the archduke of Austria, Franz Ferdinand and his wife. One of the major causes of World War I.
The United States adhered to a policy of ISOLATIONIST after World War I.
After the war ended in 1918, America decided to adopt an isolationist policy, which had been previously interrupted due to the war. The U.S. wanted to stay out of global affairs, avoid political or permanent economic/politic alliances that didn't serve their interests, including entering the League of Nations, international cooperation first proposed by the American President Wilson.
Instead, the U.S. focused on domestic issues such as business growth, industrial expansion, imposing of tariffs on imported products, among others.
Answer:
B) It gave the public audience the ability to see what officials looked like and see the effects of their actions.
Explanation:
The power of conviction that television exerts on voters during an election campaign can become decisive in the triumph or defeat of a particular party or candidate, since for a very large number of citizens it is the only source of information. This mass media supports electoral campaigns, through informative programs and free advertising spaces for political parties.
Thus begins then, a dependence on TV from which virtually no government on the planet can escape. Such is the importance reached by television as a vehicle for the dissemination of ideas, that necessarily the link between public institutions and this medium as an instrument tends to weaken, since the main form of political communication can not, and should not be solely under the control of the power of the state. Private television channels are born as a result of public demand, and public television networks seek information neutrality, which makes them more credible and allows them to enter the ruthless struggle for attraction and attention of viewers.