Which enlightenment writer opposed political absolutism

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The writers is known as John Locke.
Answer 2
Answer:

Final answer:

John Locke, an Enlightenment writer, actively opposed political absolutism, advocating instead for limited governmental power through the separation of powers.

Explanation:

One key Enlightenment writer who opposed political absolutism was John Locke. Locke was a proponent of liberalism and believed in the separation of powers. He argued that the power of a ruler or government should be limited to prevent the abuse of power. This notion radically opposed the idea of absolutism, a political theory where a single ruler has total authority and is not restricted by laws or a constitution.

Learn more about Enlightenment opposition to absolutism here:

brainly.com/question/32861533

#SPJ6


Related Questions

Briefly explain how ONE person or group in the U.S. in the period 1789 to1800 challenged the United States government's foreign policy. *
Major Crops of Mexicocorn citrus sugar cane coffee What can you determine about Mexico's climate by looking at this list of three of Mexico's largest crops? A) the weather is warm Eliminate B) the weather is cold C) there are not enough rivers D) there are too many mountains there
Ye need the answer to this 2.)explain carefully why the medieval guild was so important to the medieval town.
Why was Jamestown taken over by the British government in 1624?
What's the best answer. At the height of the Ottoman Empire, Suleyman was the most powerful monarch in A. The Middle East B. The world C. Europe D. Asia

Please, help. Look a photo.

Answers

The answer would be C

Why was the Articles of Confederation discarded?

Answers

The articles had a lot of weaknesses. Their was no executive branch, which means their was no one to actually enforce the laws. Their was no judicial branch, so there was no one to settle disputes between states. Also, the federal/central government didn't have the power to tax. This lead to shay's rebellion because the state's taxes were too high and the federal government couldn't keep them in check.
The Articles of Confederation was discarded because problems arrived from the National and State governments. States did not have a high level of cooperation that they needed to succeed as a nation. There was no National Government powerful enough to wage war against another country or Native Americans. No executive branch or national courts. They needed a more strong and unified government so they met for the constitutional convention and drafted the constitution we know today.

Alexander’s conquests led him to invade what part of Asia?

Answers

he invaded India when he conquered asia. i hope this helps

Answer: Alexander’s conquests led him to invade Asia Minor

What caused the Revolutions of 1848 in Europe? Check all that apply.

Answers

Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the correct response would be the one having to do with "craving for democracy," since people were still being inspired by things like the French and American Revolutions. 

Which feature of the U.S. Government was consideredradical in 1776?
Led by a powerful leader
Decisions made by elected representatives
Authority granted over a large population
Citizenship limited to white men

Answers

The correct option is decisions made by elected representatives.

What happened in 1776 with the government?

By issuing the Declaration of Independence, adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, the 13 American colonies severed their political connections to Great Britain.

What was the government that was established in 1776?

The Articles of Confederation served as the written document that established the functions of the nationalgovernment of the United States after it declared independence from Great Britain.

Learn more about U.S. Government here brainly.com/question/12486518

#SPJ2

Answer:decisions made by elected representatives

Explanation:i did it so i know its right

why might a sanction against the use of chemical or biological weapons be part of the Geneva conventions

Answers

One of the main reasons why a sanction against the use of chemical or biological weapons be part of the Geneva conventions is because these types of weapons proved to be extremely terrible and torturous in warfare, and no country wanted their citizens exposed to such weapons. 

Answer:

Explanation:

The Geneva Conventions operate under the just war doctrine, which attempts to make war morally permissible. The Geneva Conventions work to make war a more humane experience.

Chemical and biological weapons, perhaps more than traditional weapons, produce particularly inhumane results. They often do not kill a person, but instead leave the person badly burned, unable to breathe, or unable to see. These effects are considered to be cruel and unusual acts of punishment and violence.