What event brought the United States into World War II?A.Germany's bombing of English cities

B.Germany's final solution for the Jews--the Holocaust

C.Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor

D.Italy's invasion of Ethiopia

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: C. Japan's Attack on Pearl Harbor
Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

C Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor

Explanation:


Related Questions

As a result of the Boston Tea Party in 1773, colonists were upset becauseit was unfair that only one colony was granted special rights the king passed the Intolerable Acts that threatened their natural rights they believed only people in Massachusetts should be punished the British refused to supply the colonists with tea and other goods
Which of the following civilizations was NOT an early inhabitant of ancient Greece?a Minoans c. Sumerians b. Dorians d. Mycenaeans
Which is implied power of the federal government
Fundamentally, the dispute between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton during the Washington administration came down to the fact that
How did the Pacific railway acts influence western settlement

Which country’s government did the colonists model their government after ?

Answers

Great Britain and aspects from Greek democracy. 

What was the link between the political situations in Iran and Nicaragua during the mid-1980s

Answers

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "Both countries fought the USSR with weapons supplied by the United States."  the link between the political situations in Iran and Nicaragua during the mid-1980s is that Both countries fought the USSR with weapons supplied by the United States.

The Answer is  "Profits from the arms sold to Iran were used to fund the Contras in Nicaragua." just took the test

Why are first hand accounts important?

Answers

because they aren't tainted and the meanings are not warped, for example, second hand accounts rely on other people's accounts and words to make an inference which could be wrong. First hand accounts are generally more accurate

Russia and Britain competed for Persia because it offeredaccess to the Suez Canal.
control of Central Asia.
land and resources.
industrial power.

Answers

During the 19th century, almost from 1830 onwards, two great empires butted heads with each other in a diplomatic and political confrontation over the control of central Asia and especially the access that the lands of this region provided to India, which was part of the British Empire. The two empires fighting were Britain and Russia. Both were looking for these lands and each were doubtful about the control the other had on the regions, especially in Asia and Europe. This led to a situation known as the Great Game, which ended in a military confrontation in 1838. Although part of the reason of the confrontation was the desire for control of Central Asia, the main reason for this was the desire of both empires to outdo the other in the control of the land and resources that were offered by the countries of the region. The correct answer here then is C: land and resources.

Answer:

land and resources.

Explanation:

edg 2020

What did President George H. W. Bush's New World Order espouse?

Answers

The New World Order referred to the time after the Cold War (it was the term used by both G.H.W Bush and Mikhail Gorbachev) , when it was believed that the big powers, hostile to each other until then, would cooperate in peace.

collaboration between nations to prevent tyranny

hope this helped

A historian claims massive drought and famine in China caused the Boxer Rebellion. Which of the following historians is making a counterclaim. A historian who claims the Boxer Rebellion followed directly from the actions of external colonial powers
B. A historian who shares a diary entry from a Chinese woman who lost her crops to drought
C. A historian who offers evidence that Christians were targeted during the Boxer Rebellion
D. A historian who shows that harvest yields declined in the years before the Boxer Rebellion

Answers

The best option in terms of a counterclaim would be "A historian who claims the Boxer Rebellion followed directly from the actions of external colonial powers," since he would be refuting the original idea. 

The best answer is  A historian who claims the Boxer Rebellion followed directly from the actions of external colonial powers.

In order to understand this question, let us investigate what counterclaim means. It means a claim made to invalidate a previous claim. In this context, our answer needs to have, in its context a structure that goes against what the first historian said.

A historian who claims the Boxer Rebellion followed directly from the actions of external colonial powers - True - By giving a total antagonist cause for the rebellion, a cause that sustains itself with no connection to the previous argument, this case qualifies as a counterclaim for the first historian.

B. A historian who shares a diary entry from a Chinese woman who lost her crops to drought - False - This argument contributes to the original argument, showing a case that supports the historian.

C. A historian who offers evidence that Christians were targeted during the Boxer Rebellion - False - This claim only indicates the possible targets of the Boxer Rebellion, knowing the first claim is about the reason for the rebellion, it does not qualify as a counterclaim.

D. A historian who shows that harvest yields declined in the years before the Boxer Rebellion - False - This argument reinforces the first historian argument, showing one possible cause for the massive drought and famine in China.