The act of being responsible for a behavior is known as what?Liability
causation
harm
or concurrence

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: the answer is causation

Related Questions

Imperialism was the name given to the idea that Americans should expand across the nation to the Pacific Coast. a. Trueb. False
How many Americans had died in the Vietnam War by the time Nixon took office in January 1969?
Who is more likely to be sympathetic with the idea of reducing the disparities of income in society? Utilitarians Libertarians Robert Nozick Milton Friedman
In ancient greece , the philosopher aristotle
One of the main things that tobacco did for Jamestown was to

Who is considered to be the founder of modern public opinion polling

Answers

George Gallup is considered to be the founder of modern public opi In 1935 he founded the American Institute for Public Opinion

Compare and contrast the settling of Jamestown to that of the colonies in
Massachusetts

Answers

think about location first. Jamestown had more farming time cause it was farther south. also the soil was very different so the pilgrims needed the Indians help because they could not farm the same things the did back home. Massachusetts was also more religious. where Jamestown was military and economically based.

To which of the following places did Cheng ho not travel

Answers

Hi. I'm not sure if there should be choices in your item but assuming there is none, here is my answer. The only places that Cheng Ho did not travel to America and Europe. He was able to lead seven expeditions mostly within Asia and Africa.

Answer:

The correct answer is Cheng did not travel to Hispaniola which is in the Caribbean Hopefully this helps!

Which of these changes resulted from the United States' entry into World War II?The birthrate among young couples in urban areas decreased significantly.
Women entered the industrial workforce in large numbers for the first time.
African Americans were able to eliminate major forms of legal discrimination.
Labor unions gained thousands of new members and increased political power.

Answers

United States entry into World War II made women enter the industrial workforce in large numbers for the first time.

The skilled labor of women was symbolized in the United States by the concept of Rosie the Riveter, a hardworking woman who performed work that was once considered 'men's work'.

With this expanded horizon of opportunities and confidence, and with the extended knowledge base, many women could now have paid and voluntary employment, the roles of women in World War II were much broader than in World War I.

In 1945, more than 2.2 million women worked in the war industries, in the construction of ships, aircraft, vehicles and weapons. The women also worked in factories, ammunition plants and farms, and also drove trucks, provided logistical support for the soldiers and entered professional work areas that were previously the exclusive domain of men.



Women entered the industrial workforce in large numbers for the first time. (I think this is the Answer because in WW1 I'm not sure if women played a big role in industry)

As a result of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), nothing suspects say can be used against them in court unless __________.

Answers

As a result of Miranda v. Arizona [1966], nothing suspects say can be used against them in court unless they have been advised of their rights. During the case of Miranda versus Arizona, it was established that statements made during interogation by defendants in the police station will be acceptable in courts duriing trials only if the prosecution can show evidence that the defendant was informed of the right to talk to his or her lawyer before and during questioning and of the right against self incrimination before police questioning. And the prosecution should also be able to demonstrate that the defendant understand these rights but voluntarily waived them.

As a result of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), nothing suspects say can be used against them in court unless they are informed about their rights.

Further Explanation:

The decision of the “Miranda versus Arizona” stated that the individuals who are arrested must be notified about their “constitutional rights”, being arrested or questioned. As per the decision, the 5th Amendment act prohibits prosecutors from using suspect speech made at the time of custody and questioning. It is individuals’ legal right to consult an attorney before being interrogated.

The case was considered a drastic change in the “American Criminal law” as it altered the extended the importance of the 5th Amendment. Earlier, it was considered that the act will protect the citizens against the obligation to contempt and confess in the court and after the decision; it became mandatory to inform individuals about their rights. This procedure also referred to as Miranda warning and oral notifications given to the arrestee during custody.

Learn More:

1. in Furman v. Georgia (1972), the supreme court ruled in William Furman’s favor, saying that Georgia had

brainly.com/question/2816742

2. Though the outcomes of the Schenck and New York Times differed, what did these decisions have in common? The government has a heavy burden to prove harm. The government can limit speech that causes harm. The government has unlimited power to limit speech. The government must follow the first amendment.

brainly.com/question/1804110

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Miranda versus Arizona

Subject: History

Keywords: Miranda versus Arizona, constitutional rights, amendment, custody, legal right, attorney, criminal law, court

At what age were slaves first forced to work in the fields AND roughly how many lived to be 60 years old?

Answers

Answer:

from the age of 10

Explanation:

Jai shree Ram