How did Alexander Hamilton and James Madison view the Constitution?They strongly opposed the Constitution.
They were on opposite sides of the debate about the Constitution.
They led those who favored the Constitution.
They were two Anti-Federalists who supported the Constitution

Answers

Answer 1

Answer:

Answer:

They led those who favored the Constitution.

Explanation:

Alexander Hamilton and James Madison were two of the Founding Fathers of the United States, and leaders of the Federalist party as well, who, along with John Jay, wrote the Federalist Papers (1787), which consisted of a series of essays that explained and support the proposed Constitution. Through these essays, Madison, Hamilton, and Jay aimed to lead those who favored the Constitution and persuade the opponents to ratify it as it would empower the federal government to act firmly and coherently in the national interest.

Answer 2

Answer:

Alexander Hamilton and James Madison lead those who were in the favour of the constitution. They did this because they believed that system will preserve the Union and empower federal government.

Further Explanation:

The Federalists papers were the articles which had 85 collections under it and these were written by famous American author Alexander Hamilton and James Madison and its objective was to promote Ratification of United States Constitution. That time, Constitution needed the approval of 9 states out of 13 states. The writers of these 85 articles weighted in with essays under the pseudonym stating that the proposed system will empower federal government to act firmly in national interest. They feared that a tyrannical government would hold supersede states and encroach on liberties given to the Individuals.

Alexander Hamilton and James Madison wanted a strong constitution for the country and they cited the reason that under a strong federal government, the country will run smoothly. These essays were published in form of book form named, ' The Federalist' in 1788, and this book has received critical acclamation and is widely read and this book is respected for its master analysis and the principles upon which United States government was established.

Alexander Hamilton who was among the authors of these articles, Went on to become secretary of Treasury in year 1789 before he resigned from his post after a year. James Madison became one of the leading members from the House of Representatives.

Learn more:

1. According to the Supreme Court, which of these most likely prompted the arrest of the protesters in Edwards v. South Carolina? brainly.com/question/2419144

2. The most influential and powerful members of a political party are most likely found? brainly.com/question/11032918

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Subject: Constitution

Chapter: The Federalists papers

Keywords:

President, United States of America, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, The Federalists papers, Treasury, Constitution, Representative, Secretary, Government.

Related Questions

What is the historical significance of the year 1898?
(75 POINTS!!!) World War II was one of the most significant events of the 1900s and one of the most important events in US history. Think about how much the United States changed between the Great Depression and the postwar era, when the country had become an economic powerhouse. How did World War II influence and change the identity of the United States throughout the 1900s and into the present? What are some positive and negative changes that occurred in the United States in the years after World War II?
Which of the following cities is located on the most densely populated island of Indonesia?A. Jakarta B. Bangkok C. Kuala Lumpur D. Manila
This 1930 tariff was passed with the goal of protecting the American economy, but in reality it reduced U.S. imports and exports by as much as 50%.Example: It was a major cause of the Great Depression.First 2 letters: Ha
How did Southern whites react to the Nat Turner rebellion?

Dadaists were artists who...were ordered by Hitler to create pro–Nazi, pro–Germany works of public art.
tried to express in their art their revulsion for what they saw as the insanity of life.
separated everyday objects from their normal contexts.
thought modern art was degenerate.

Answers

Dadaists were artists who tried to express in their art their revulsion for what they saw as the insanity of life. The correct option among all the options given in the question is the second option. Dadaism is actually a post World War I cultural movement in literature and visual art. It was actually a protest made against the barbarism of war as a whole.

Dadaists were artists who tried to separate everyday objects from their normal contexts. This can be seen in their works which were often quite different compared to the usual works of artists at the time.

Why did the London Company sponsor the Jamestown settlement? The company wanted to find a waterway to the Orient. The land and climate was favorable for growing crops. The company hoped to be repaid in silver and gold from Jamestown.

Answers

One of the main reasons why the London Company sponsored the Jamestown settlement was because "The company hoped to be repaid in silver and gold from Jamestown," since the Spanish had been successful in this endeavor (The British, however, were not).

Answer:The answer is C-The company hoped to be repaid in silver & gold

Explanation:

I selected B and got it wrong. The answer is C

"I announce I will sign an executive order to deny federal contracts to businesses that hire illegal immigrants. We are still a nation of immigrants; we should be proud of it. But we are also a nation of laws." -- President Clinton, 1996 State of the Union Address Which of the following statements best explains the quote?
a. The government should give all companies a fair chance at acquiring government work even if it hired non-citizens.
b. The government would not consider hiring companies that had employed unlawful residents.

Answers

Answer: b. The government would not consider hiring companies that had employed unlawful residents.

The quote states that the government will not consider giving federal contracts to businesses that hire illegal immigrants. The reason Clinton gives for this executive order is that businesses that do so disregard the laws of the country. And while he believed immigrants to be an important addition to the United States, the laws need to also be valued at all times.

I've noticed that the rest of the options are missing. But it doesn't matter as the answer is b. The government would not consider hiring companies that had employed unlawful residents.

Which of the following rights were guaranteed under the Bill of Rights? freedom of press, speech, and the right of women to vote no cruel and unusual punishments, the prohibition of alcohol, and the right to a trial by jury freedom of assembly, the right to petition, and illegality of bills of attainder right to bear arms, due process of law, and freedom from unreasonable searches or seizures

Answers

Freedom of the press, freedom of speech, freedom from cruel and unusual punishment, the right to a trial by jury, the right to petition, freedom of assembly, the right to bear arms, due process of law, and freedom and the freedom of unreasonable searches and seizures are all rights that are protected in the Bill of Rights.

When Republicans chose Ulysses S. Grant as their presidential candidate in the election of 1868, Democrats chosea. Andrew Johnson.
c. Samuel Tilden.
b. Horatio Seymour.
d. Rutherford
b. Hayes.

Answers

The answer is:

b. Horatio Seymour.

Held on Tuesday, November 3, 1868, the 21st presidential elections in the United States were won by Ulysses S. Grant, defeating Horatio Seymour by an electoral margin of 214-80.

What issue was debated in the Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education case? (4 points)busing of students to integrate public schools
use of quotas to ensure expanded minority hiring
rights of parents to remove their children from school
limitation of public school students' Constitutional rights

Answers

The answer is A busing of students to integrate publicschools. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, case in which, on April 20, 1971, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously upheld busing programs that aimed to speed up the racial integration of public schools in the United States. ... Indeed, busing was used by white officials to maintain segregation.

from wiki... lol. Also took the test.

Final answer:

The Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education case debated the constitutionality of busing students to integrate public schools.

Explanation:

The issue that was debated in the Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education case was the busing of students to integrate public schools. This landmark case took place in 1971. The United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the busing of students to promote integration of public schools is constitutional. This ruling affirmed busing as a legitimate and valuable tool for desegregating public schools, addressing the long-standing racial segregation that plagued the American education system.

The issue debated in the Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education case was the busing of students to integrate public schools.