Answer:
D. king; lords; vassals; serfs
Explanation:
The social order at the end of the middle age was hierarchical and statist. Hierarchical because it was very difficult for a person to move from one social position to another. Statistical, because each person assumed a very well defined role in society, generally according to the group in which he was born.
There was a great disparity of income between the richest (Kings and lords) and the poorest (serfs and vassals). Therefore, this society was marked by strong social inequality.
Answer:
the answer is D king; lords; serfs; vassals
Explanation:
on the road to 1k people helped
If he uses cash, the purchase details will be automatically recorded in his bank records.
If he uses cash, it will show he is responsible, and his credit history will improve.
Paying with cash will prevent the buildup of interest charges on the paid amount. <------- my answer
The correct answer is D) Paying with cash will prevent the buildup of interest charges on the paid amount.
If Jeff wants to buy pizza for dinner, the advantage of using cash instead of credit would be that Paying with cash will prevent the buildup of interest charges on the paid amount.
Many people prefer to pay in cash instead of credit because they do not like to accumulate debts if they cannot pay in time. If Jeff uses cash, he simply uses the money in his pocket and the deal is done. That's it. However, if he uses a credit card to pay for the pizza, he is going to accumulate the amount of money he needs to pay at the end of the month with other purchases. If he does not pay on time, he is going to be charged interests.
Italian patrons of art
2.
Islamic scholars
Protestant missionaries
4.
Portuguese explorers
Answer:
1. Italian patrons of art
Answer:
The correct options are:
Explanation:
According to the economic theory in vogue, we live in a society of freedom of investment, where the imagination and commitment of individuals in the founding of companies can be realized; here, it is said, personal initiative is not restricted, as it does in centrally planned economies, in which the state controls and limits capital. Thus, the strategists of the current model, based on the neoliberal doctrine, assume that ordinary men take the economy in their hands, freely, according to their abilities and inventiveness. Adam Smith in his Wealth of Nations advocates individual investment against monopolies such as the East India Company, which controlled England's trade with its Asian colonies. In revolutionary France, the ascending bourgeoisie that freed itself from feudal oppression, consecrated in the famous law Le Chapelier, 1791, free citizenship as an inalienable right of citizens. With time, this principle incarnated in many cases in the youthful stage of capitalism; in it it was possible. For example, in the United States with the small businessmen who arrived at the 13 colonies, or entrepreneurs who prospered as ranchers in the lands they obtained almost as gifts in the center and west, or exploiting gold veins in California. But that time is over! This idyllic world of opportunities for all, an illusion of many, democratic and inclusive and that attracts the imagination, is increasingly chimerical.
Corporations in U.S. history had advantages over small businesses in access to capital, risk diversification, economies of scale, and limited liability.
In the context of U.S. history, corporations held several advantages over small businesses. Firstly, they had greater access to capital, enabling them to invest in advanced technology, larger staff, and broader marketing efforts. Another advantage was their ability to diversify risk. By operating in different geographic areas and business sectors, corporations mitigated the risk of financial losses. They also had larger economies of scale, which meant they could buy and produce goods more cheaply and efficiently as a result of their size. In the event of financial difficulty, corporations had a critical advantage of 'limited liability,' where investors were only liable for their investment amount, protecting personal assets from corporate financial failure.
#SPJ6
Government has the power to protect natural rights, but people can change their government if it fails to do so.
Answer:
Government has the power to protect natural rights, but people can change their government if it fails to do so.
Explanation:
Edge
The correct answer is A) Women in ancient Egypt had many legal rights, including the right to own property and businesses.
The statement that best describes the status of women in ancient Egyptian society is "Women in ancient Egypt had many legal rights, including the right to own property and businesses."
Although women in other regions had minimum rights and were segregated to household activities, in ancient Egypt had an important place in society. Women had legal rights, could own property, had equal rights to men. One of the most notorious differences between men and women was that women could not occupy government and authority jobs as men did. They could work in many kinds of jobs and select their men in marriage.
Answer:
Egyptian women held higher status than women elsewhere in the ancient world.
Explanation:
If you guessed the answer to this question, or did not answer it correctly, go back and review the Egyptian Learning Advances lesson.