Which statement about the U.S. invasion of Iraq is true? A. After the Iraqi army was defeated, a costly civil war broke out, which President Bush hadn't planned for. B. Saddam Hussein fled the country before U.S. forces reached Baghdad and now lives in exile in Iran. C. Once Saddam Hussein was ousted, the U.S. helped established a stable, peaceful democracy in Iraq. D. U.S. forces found Osama bin Laden hiding in a palace in Baghdad and captured him.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

A. After the Iraqi army was defeated, a costly civil war broke out, which President Bush hadn't planned for.

Explanation:

The Iraq war was an armed conflict led by the United States in 2003 in order to overthrow Sadam Husein´s government. Once this objective was achieved, an insurgency arouse in response to the occupying forces and the poorly erected government that the USA put in place precariously. This conflict is an ongoing struggle that the USA did not manage to control and that still afflicts the people of Iraq.  

Answer 2
Answer: The answer is A) After the Iraqi Army was defeated, a costly civil war broke out, which President Bush hadn't planned for

Related Questions

Causes of the westward expansion
1. What is federalism?​
Why is the period from 1870-1900 referred to as the “gilded age”?
How quick are police are reflected in the charter of liberties
Which Enlightenment thinker believed that it is a government's job to protect the natural rights of life, liberty, and property?(Points : 2)Adam SmithThomas HobbesBaron de MontesquieuJohn Locke

Who was the new commander of the Union Army prior to Gettysburg

Answers

 im pretty sure it was General John Buford. hope this helps.

DEBATE: Should Supreme Court justices have term limits? Pro: They should have term limits.HELP!! can someone please help me with what is stated in the image, also if u can please include websites on where to find the information in this message. thanks!!

Answers

The Supreme Court Justices appointed to such position, have the chance to be in the highest Court in the land for their entire lifetime; meaning that they will work as Supreme Court Justices until they die, retire, go thru impeachment or resign. William O. Douglas had the longest tenure in the history of the Supreme Court, consisting of 36 years, from 1939 to 1975; followed by Stephen Johnson Field, who served in the Supreme Court from 1863 to 1897, serving a total of 34 years. The list goes on and on; Justices can stay a very long time in their seats. The unfortunate truth; being in the Supreme Court bubble for too long can have negative effects in the points of views of Justices. According to John Roberts, he said back in 1983 that longer and longer terms can lose touch with the world outside the court. He stated that ¨setting a term of, say 15 years would ensure that federal judges would not lose all touch with reality through decades of ivory tower existence. ¨  

The thought that Supreme Court Justices can lose the sense of the real world is concerning. The responsibilities that come with the job they have are great. The future of million Americans depends on them, and to think that they can lose touch with the reality that is shared by the vast majority of Americans is heart aching.  

Under these circumstances, it has to be understood that the Supreme Court is the highest U.S court, and decisions that Justices make are both final, and cause a deep impact in every life in this country. It goes from abortion to Rump´s ban on travel from certain countries and even labor unions. The President has the right to propose who can possibly occupy such position; however, the untimely recent events just told, give the current President, two opportunities to fill in the seats with conservative-minded Justices, who can make decisions that negatively change the lives of a lot of Americans.  

Having realized that one person can profoundly impact every single American, is worthy of giving it a second look. Maybe term limits –the the one Presidents have –can be a good idea after all. Setting term limits for Supreme Court Justices is the best action to make, according to the data shown in this investigation. Along with John Robert´s statement, The Economist Magazine also states that making the Supreme Court more versatile, it can be a positive turnover; it would make it more responsive to social conflicts or specific cases where the sense of reality can be the difference between making the best decision and worst in someone’s life. To be the cause or effect.  

Seeking a term limits for the Supreme Court Justice is not undermining American strength or democracy, but rather a step to make a more perfect union. This was the vision of our founding fathers, without any doubt. There are proposals of shortening the tenure to 10, 12 or 18 years. Unexpected departures for one would not be much of a problem with term limits, since the government would have a clear idea of when a seat in the Supreme Court would need replacement.  

In conclusion, giving timeless power to one person, is not the best of ideas. As a democracy, America cannot allow such thing. Furthermore, the evidence shown by different media outposts explicitly explains that there is no direct benefit of having a life time seat in the Supreme Court. Justices should make the highest Court in the land more responsive to sensitive issues regarding the American society.


Which transportation breakthrough had the GREATEST impact on the economic development of the American frontier in the late-1860s?
A)
the Erie Canal
B)
the automobile
C)
the interstate highway system
D)
the Transcontinental Railroad
Eliminate

Answers

Answer: D) the transcontinental railroads eliminate

Explanation:

What is washingtons message to the american people in this excerpt

Answers

Do not: get involved in european affairs, make permanent alliances in foreign affairs, form political parties, and fall into sectionalism.

What did the Declaration of Independence describe

Answers

it explained the specific ways in which England allegedly failed the colonies.

Why are PLANETS important?

Answers

 1)Planets are important because they can help us find out more about our planet.

2) Planets can give us resources for our planet


for example : Going to them can let us see what our planet looks like from outer space .


I hope that's help !