Without freedom of speech, it would be difficult to have Life or liberty or property or happiness

And Why

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

Because without freedom of speech anyone could be taken to jail for simply saying something someone in power didn't like. You do not have any freedom or the liberty to do something without expressing yourself. You do not have life or any happiness when you cannot truly be and express yourself.


Related Questions

Who was Hades in Greek mythology
Roger Williams was______ because he believed in freedom for all and not taking land away from the natives.A. Adored.B. BanishedC. Promoted D. Revered
How did Harriet Beecher Stowe help increase opposition to slavery? A. by writing a powerful book, Uncle Tom's Cabin, showing the evils of slavery B. by writing "Civil Disobedience," an essay that describes ways to undermine slavery C. by organizing religious revivals against slavery D. by donating money to abolitionist newspapers
Which statement about the Renaissance artist Michelangelo is not true? A. He drew blueprints for many revolutionary inventions, such as a hang glider and an armored tank. B. He was a master of carving the human form out of marble and created such works as the Pietà and David. C. He designed a lofty dome to crown St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome but died before it was completed. D. He painted the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel in Rome with nearly 350 human figures in a variety of Biblical scenes.
HELP PLEASE What does the story “Horatius at the Bridge” show about Roman values? A. Romans valued loyalty and discipline. B. Romans valued peace more than war. C. Romans valued the contributions of the commoners. D. Romans valued strong armies.

How did the issue of slavery affect the debate on representation at the Constitutional Convention? Both regions recognized that how enslaved people were counted would significantly affect representation. The northern states were convinced that enslaved people should be included fully as a part of the population. The southern states knew counting enslaved people as part of the population would damage their governmental position. Neither region wanted the enslaved people counted as part of the population because it would skew their representation.

Answers

The right answer is "Both regions recognized that how enslaved people were counted would significantly affect representation."

Many issues remained unresolved during the constitutional convention. Among the most important was the subject of slavery. Slaves were close to a fifth of the population in the American colonies. Most lived in the southern colonies, where they reached 40 percent of the population. Whether slavery should be permitted and continued under the new constitution was a matter of north-south conflict, with several southern states refusing entry into the union if slavery were forbidden. So there was no serious discussion about the abolition of slavery.

The most debatable issue of slavery was the question of whether slaves would be taken into account as part of the population in determining representation in Congress or were considered as property and without the right to representation. State delegates with large populations of slaves defended the idea that slaves should be considered people in determining representation, but as property if the new government were to impose taxes on states based on population. The delegates of states where slavery had disappeared or had almost disappeared defended the idea that slaves should be included in taxes, but not in the determination of representation.

Finally the Commitment of the Three Fifths was proposed by the delegate James Wilson and adopted by the convention. By this commitment only three-fifths of the slave population would be counted toward enumeration purposes both at the time of tax distribution and at the apportionment of the members of the United States House of Representatives.

Answer:

The correct answer is option A.

The issue of slavery affected the debate on the representation at the Constitutional Convention as both the regions recognized that how the enslaved people were counted would significantly affect their representation.

Explanation

The debate on the Constitutional Convention on the issue arose with the number of representation of the states in the House. The eventual compromise that was reached at the end of the debate was that the representation of the slaves shall be the three-fifth of that of a free person.  

Further Explanation

The debate on the Constitutional Convention in the month of February in the year 1787 was in order to let Congress to consider the revision of the Articles of the Confederation, the first constitution of the nation. The debate on the issue of slavery arose with the representation of the slaves as the population to determine the representation of the states. The Southern states of the country felt fearful of the fact that they would be overpowered by the strong states in the House. Hence in order to increase their representation they argued that the slaves must be included in the population to affect their representation. This was then criticized by the other powerful states who argued that the slaves were the property and not the persons and hence their representation must not be considered.  

Hence the compromise was reached through the Article 1, Section 2 of the Constitution which incorporated the ideas of both the property and person respectively. The compromise thus stated that the free persons which excluded the Indians which were not taxed and including all those who were bound with the Service for the term of years, plus the three-fifth of all other persons.

Learn More

Learn more about the Constitutional Convention : brainly.com/question/514069 ;

Answered by HistoryGuy

Learn more about the Constitutional Convention : brainly.com/question/9961732 ;

Saadhussain514

Keywords

Debate on constitutional convention, debate on slavery, three-fifth voting of slaves, representation of the Southern states, concerns of the southern states in the Constitutional debate.

Why did many immigrants come to Texas in the early 1900s?A. The processing center for all immigrants to the United States was on the Gulf Coast.

B. Texas had become famous overseas because of the popularity of Movie Westerns.

C. They were seeking work and often fleeing conflict in their own countries.

D. Foreign governments selected Texas as a place to send unemployed workers.

Answers

Many immigrants come to Texas in the early 1900s  because they were seeking work and often fleeing conflict in their own countries. Thus option (C) is correct.

What are immigration?

The immigration is the process through which persons become permanent residents or citizens of another country which is not his or her place of birth.

The history tells that the process of immigration because people lack the opportunity and they were facing some kind of oppression in their native place. So, due to great social, economic, and cultural benefit in other states the people migrate.

The immigration has become an important factor for a rise in population of a country which attracts immigrants.

Many immigrants come to Texas in the early 1900s  because they were seeking work and often fleeing conflict in their own countries. Therefore, option (C) is correct.

Learn more about immigration here:

brainly.com/question/17141328

#SPJ6

C.) They were seeking work and often fleeing conflict in their own country.

What is jurisdiction

Answers

Answer:

Jurisdiction is the power to make legal desicions and judgments.

Jurisdiction is where police are allowed to arrest or pull over someone

if you lived in 1849, do u think you would gave waned to go to california for the gold rush? why or why not?

Answers

Answer:

No and yes.

Explanation:

No because it was so crowded and you are not even sure if you can get any gold.

Yes beacause you have a slight chance of getting gold.

What is the economic theory behind pump priming?

Answers

Pump priming is the action take to simulate an economy

What is the meaning of in order to form a more perfect union

Answers

Answer:

It states the purpose of the fathers of the US Constitution to establish the best possible system of government , one that would satisfy the members of the federation and would regularly look for improvement for the general well-being.

Explanation: