John of Leyden:
Henry VIII:
Elizabeth I:
Answer:
Henry Vlll
Explanation:
I did the quiz/assignment
Lobbyist - A person who is employed by and acts for an organized interest group or corporation to try to influence policy decisions and positions in the executive and legislative branches.
Hope this helps. :)
veto laws
oversee the military
make official appointments
The president of the United States does not have the power to make laws. This power is specifically held by the legislative branch of government, which includes Congress.
In the United States, the president does have many powers but they do not have the power to make laws. According to the Constitution, the law-making power is reserved for the legislative branch, specifically Congress, which includes the House of Representatives and the Senate. However, the president can veto laws proposed by Congress, oversee the military as Commander in Chief, and make official appointments, such as those to the Supreme Court or the Cabinet.
#SPJ2
b. They believed it would give too much power to the federal government.
c. They believed it was a bundle of compromises.
d. They believed it would propel the nation into anarchy.
e. They believed it was weaker than the Articles of Confederation.
NextReset
Answer:
b. They believed it would give too much power to the federal government.
Explanation:
Those who defended the Confederacy accused the delegates of conspiring a coup and denounced that the Convention had opted for a "civil monarch" to govern the United States. The group that defended the Confederation was the one that bet on the local powers and passed to History with the name of Anti Federalists. They indeed believed that the Federal Government would have too much power.
The option (a) is correct. Anti-federalists oppose the new constitution because they believed it would give too much power to the federal government.
Further Explanation:
Anti-Federalist:
Anti-Federalism was a political party which was against the establishment of the USA Constitution. According to Anti-Federalist theory, the creation of the constitution would seize the power of the state government. The major statements made by the anti-federalist are as follows:
• The creation of the constitution would give the monarchy alike powers to the president of USA.
• The constitution would decrease or invalidate state government power.
• The creation of the constitution would give unreasonable powers to the government.
• The creation of the federal government would not be appropriate as citizens of different states would not get access to the government very easily and quickly.
• The creation of the USA constitution would result in the establishment of the Bill of right, which would restrict the liberty of the citizens.
Thus, the anti-federalist oppose the new constitution because it would give many powers to the federal government of the USA.
Justification for the correct and incorrect option:
a.
They believed it favored the more populous states: This is the correct option.
The creation of the USA constitution would not favor the states with the populous states.
b.
They believed it would give too much power to the federal government: This is an incorrect option. The creation of the USA constitution would limit the powers of the state government and give much power to the federal government.
c.
They believed it was a bundle of compromises: This is an incorrect option.
It was a bundle of the bill of rights to the common citizens.
d.
They believed it would propel the nation into anarchy: This is an incorrect option.
The USA constitution would create a more structured law and rule system in the country.
e.
They believed it was weaker than the Articles of Confederation: This is an incorrect option.
They considered that it would only limit the power of the state government.
Learn more:
1. Learn more about the Article I
2. Learn more about the creation of the government
3. Learn more about article II
Answer details:
Grade: Middle School
Subject: Political Science
Chapter: USA constitution
Keywords: Why, Antifederalists, oppose, new, constitution, favored, more, populous, states, give, too, much, power, the federal, government, bundle, compromises, propel, nation, into anarchy, weaker, than, Articles of Confederation.
During the early Paleozoic era, South America, Africa, Australia, Antarctica, India, and perhaps China comprised the vast southern continent of Pangaea. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the fourth option or the last option. I hope that the answer has come to your help.
be guilty and innocent at
the same time?
!!!!Please hurry!!!!
Answer:
because of the nature of his deeds.
Explanation:
In 'Oedipus Rex' it is possible for Oedipus to be both guilty and innocent at the same time because of the nature of his deeds. Oedipus truly loved his people as a king and when he ventured out to find the killer of King Laius, an unexpected turn of events took place.
In the attempt to find the killer, he discovered that he was the one who killed his father, Kind Laius. However, he did not know that it was his own father whom he killed when he was young. Therefore, he can be seen as innocent.
At the same time, Oedipus is also guilty because nevertheless he killed another person who unfortunately happened to be his own father.