I believe the answer is:B. Anti-war Democrats had no candidate, so they protested at the convention.
The protest in 1968 was initiate to resist united states influence in the vietnam war. At that time, the protesters did not have a candidate because the majority of representatives in the democratic party supported the war in order to fight off communist influence in south east asia.
Answer: is B
Explanation: Anti-war Democrats had no candidate, so they protested at the convention.
While most of the Protestant sects are critically inclined towards the Catholic Church, and as such they reject the authority of the Pope, however, from this criticism and desire to express their own religious attitudes and feelings, they are not associated with Lutheranism. These various religious attitudes among the various Protestant sects originate from a different view of divinity of Christ.
they rejected the authority of papacy
B)to prevent the rich from taking to much power
C) To provide social control and conformity acording to ones birth
D) to draft a military capable of defending india from mongol invasion
The correct answer is "C".
The caste system in India is a class structure which determines the position of an individual in the social pyramid according to the household he was born in. It originated during the Sangam period, around 300 BCE. It creates the ideology that if one is born poor, he will remain poor for the rest of his life. On the other hand, if one is born rich, he will probably thrive in life. This system completely nullifies social class escalation, as it labels it as a nearly impossible option that a poor person could escape from his fate.
From organizations as diverse as courts and police forces to schools and other establishments, social structures in society can operate to offer an ordering of society. However, depending on how rigid social institutions are, some groups may also be repressed or excluded from participating in a society's decision-making processes.
In sociology, social structure is the distinctive, enduring configuration of institutions that govern how people interact and coexist in a community. Social change, which examines the processes affecting the social structure and societal organization, is frequently discussed in conjunction with social structure. Family, religion, the legal system, the economy, and class are some examples of social structures.
As opposed to the "social system," which denotes the parent structure in which these diverse structures are integrated, it is said to be in contrast. Functional theorists highlight the importance of social structure in society because it fosters predictability and order (Parsons, 1951). The social structure is crucial for our human growth, according to functionalism.
Learn more about social structure, here:
#SPJ3
The answer is B. The Court encouraged the growth of businesses by freeing them from meddling state laws. He defended business by connecting them with the stockholders’ rights and protected the corporations the same way it protected individuals from government interference.
Answer:
US population distribution changed between the Civil War and the 1920s in a process known as "Great Migration", in which many African Americans migrated from the south to the north of the United States.
Explanation:
When the Emancipation Proclamation was signed in 1863 less than eight percent of African-Americans lived in the northeastern or midwestern states of the United States. As late as 1900 ninety percent of blacks lived in formerly slave states. The majority of this population would migrate to New York, Philadelphia, Boston, Buffalo, Baltimore, Minneapolis, Detroit, Chicago, Milwaukee, Kansas City, Columbus, St. Louis, Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Cleveland and Indianapolis, as well as many small industrial cities like Gary, Dayton, Toledo, Youngstown, Peoria, Muskegon, Omaha, Newark, Flint and Albany.
Between 1910 and 1930 the black population of the United States grew 40% in the northern states, concentrating this increase in the big cities such as Chicago, Detroit, New York, and Cleveland. This increase was greater during the 1910-1920 period. As the demographic changes occurred in the cities, there was an increase in tensions between African-Americans and the last remittances from European immigrants. Both groups came from eminently rural societies and disputed jobs and housing with the preexisting white working class. The majority of racial problems in this period were found among Irish descendants who defended their jobs from the competition of more recent immigrants and black internal immigration.
In the south the departure of hundreds of thousands of African-Americans reduced the percentage of the black population over the total. For example, in Mississippi, the black population fell from 56% to 37% between 1910 and 1970 and in South Carolina, the percentage fell from 55% to 30% in the same period.
Answer:
The Louisiana Purchase had differing impacts on the various groups living in the United States at that time. Here are some key impacts on different groups:
1. Native American Tribes:
The Louisiana Purchase had significant negative consequences for Native American tribes living in the newly acquired territory. The expansion of American settlement and the westward movement brought increased pressure on Native lands, leading to displacement, loss of resources, and conflicts with settlers. The acquisition of the Louisiana Territory ultimately contributed to the further erosion of Native American sovereignty and forced removals in subsequent years.
2. French and Spanish Residents:
The Louisiana Purchase transferred ownership of the territory from France to the United States. For French and Spanish residents who had been living in the region, the impact varied. Some French residents, particularly those in New Orleans and other urban areas, were able to maintain their cultural and linguistic identity under American rule. However, others experienced cultural assimilation or displacement as American settlers moved into the region.
3. American Settlers:
The Louisiana Purchase opened up vast new lands for American settlers to expand westward. It provided opportunities for westward migration, agricultural development, and economic growth. The acquisition of the Louisiana Territory fueled the concept of "Manifest Destiny" and set the stage for further territorial expansion in the United States.
4. The United States as a Whole:
The Louisiana Purchase significantly expanded the territorial size of the United States, doubling its land area. It secured control over the Mississippi River and its vital trade routes, providing access to the Gulf of Mexico. This acquisition also removed the threat of European powers establishing a presence in North America, solidifying American dominance on the continent.
Overall, while the Louisiana Purchase brought opportunities for American settlers and expanded the territorial reach of the United States, it had detrimental effects on Native American tribes and varied impacts on French and Spanish residents in the region. The acquisition of the Louisiana Territory played a crucial role in shaping the future of the United States, but its consequences were complex and multifaceted.