Answer: 2.30x10²⁴ molecules CO2
Explanation: Solution:
Convert mass of CO2 to moles
Convert moles of CO2 to molecules using Avogadro's number.
168.2 g CO2 x 1 mole CO2 / 44 g CO2 x 6.022 x10²³ molecules CO2 / 1 mole CO2
= 2.30 x10²⁴ molecules CO2
The sample of carbon dioxide weighing 168.2 grams contains approximately 2.30 x 10^24 molecules. This is calculated by first converting the sample mass to moles, and then multiplying by Avogadro's Number.
To calculate the number of molecules in a sample, you need to know the formula for the substance and the molar mass of the substance. For carbon dioxide (CO2), the molar mass is 44.01 grams/mole.
The sample mass is 168.2 grams, so to calculate the number of moles, we divide the mass of the sample by the molar mass:
Number of moles = Sample Mass / Molar Mass =168.2 grams / 44.01 grams/mole = 3.82 moles (rounded to two decimal places).
The number of molecules is then calculated by multiplying the number of moles by Avogadro's Number (6.022 x 10^23 molecules/mole):
Number of molecules = Number of Moles x Avogadro's Number = 3.82 moles x 6.022 x 10^23 molecules/mole = 2.30 x 10^24 molecules (rounded to two decimal places).
#SPJ3
a. True
b. False
Answer:
a. True
Explanation:
The atomic radius is taken as the half of the inter nuclear distance between two atoms that are covalently bonded.
Across a period, the atomic radii usually decrease progressively because the nuclear charge(number of protons in the nucleus) increases without the increase in the number of electronic shell. Therefore, the electrons are pulled more to the nucleus.
Down a group, the effect of the nuclear pull is reduced because the number of electron shell increases and the nuclear charge is being compensated for.
PLEASEEEEE CAN SOMEONE HELP MEEE??? (iI have TWO questions PLSPLSPLSPSLPLSPLSPLSP)
3.) What happened to Patroclus at the end of yesterday's reading?
He won the battle.
He went to Mt. Olympus to talk to Zeus.
He died.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.Who was Agamemnon trying to persuade to come fight with him again?
Patroclus
Achilles
Odysseus
Hector
most to reduce atmospheric methane?
The top individual action to curb atmospheric methane is reducing consumption of meat and dairy, as these industries are primary contributors to methane production. Also, minimising waste production can help, as waste decomposition in landfills generates considerable methane.
The most effective individual action to reduce atmospheric methane is to reduce consumption of meat and dairy products. Methane is produced by digestive processes in ruminant livestock, such as cows, sheep, and goats. These animals are typically raised for meat and dairy production, so by reducing our intake, we can help decrease the number of these animals, and thus decrease the amount of methane produced. This also has the effect of reducing the amount of grain required for livestock feed, since less livestock would be raised. This grain could then be used more efficiently to feed humans directly. Additionally, reducing waste production can also help mitigate methane production, because waste decomposition in landfills is another major source of atmospheric methane.
#SPJ12
Reducing livestock agriculture, implementing sustainable grazing practices, and feeding livestock supplements to lower methane production are key actions for reducing atmospheric methane. Additionally, transitioning to clean energy and planting trees can contribute to lowering greenhouse gas concentrations.
To reduce atmospheric methane, the most effective individual action would be decreasing livestock agriculture. Livestock, particularly ruminants like cows and goats, have microbiomes that produce methane during digestion. Additionally, implementing sustainable grazing practices and improving pasture management can mitigate carbon sequestration and offset methane emissions. Feed supplement programs that reduce methane production in livestock can also have significant impacts in reducing this potent greenhouse gas emission.
Another approach is to reduce activities that create anaerobic conditions conducive to methanogen growth, such as rice cultivation in flooded fields. Switching to clean energy sources like wind, solar, and hydropower, which do not emit methane, is also an effective strategy to combat global warming. Lastly, planting more trees can help absorb carbon dioxide, another greenhouse gas that works in tandem with methane to increase global temperatures.
#SPJ2