C. The words her friend spoke to her were as sweet as honey.
D. The old man who walked into the room looked as tough as old boots.
In poetry, 'sill of shade' usually symbolizes a transition between light and darkness, which can represent various dichotomies. The narrator of a poem, who 'speaks' the poem, may be the author or a constructed character, and may bring personal perceptions to the reader's understanding of the poem.
The phrase 'sill of shade' in poetry is typically indicative of a boundary or transitional space between light and darkness, potentially symbolizing the shift between understanding and ignorance, or hope and despair, depending on the context of the poem.
The narrator of a poem is the voice that 'speaks' the poem to us. It can be the author themselves or a character invented by the author. Although some narrators are unbiased, others offer their personal views, emotions, and insights into the occurrences of the poem, shaping our understanding of the narrative.
#SPJ12
B) First-hand accounts
C) Historical evidence
D) Interpretive claims
E) Properly cited resources
The type of formal debate that it´s typically about current events or philosophy is Parliamentary debate.
The parliamentary debate also referred as "parli" is an academic event taken by many university-level and high-school level English´s speaking institutions. It´s very similar to the Spontaneous Argumentation debate in which two debaters draw a topic at random.
Parliamentary debates not require prior research. Resolutions are established only 10 minutes before a round of debates beggins. It´s because of this that persuasiveness and logic are strongly emphasized in this types of debates. They get it´s name because of their resemblance to the debates in British Parliament.
A parliamentary debate is comprised of two teams with two debators per side. The team that affirm the resolutions is called Government and the team negating it gets the name of Opposition. As we said above each team has about 10 minutes to prepare each side of the case. After the preparation time finished the Government team with it´s first debater called Prime Minister start the debate. The second debater is called member of the government. The Opposition team firt speaker is the Leader of the Opposition and the second one is a member of the opposition.
The Government team beggins and finish the debate; the first part of the debate is the constructive in which each team gives their opinions over and must present all the arguments. The final part is the rebuttal one and in there each team attacked the arguments of the other in order to support it´s position.
When the debates concludes the judges fill out a ballot to select the winning side.
I hope that the answer is correct and help you. Regards.
Answer:
parliamentary
Explanation:
just took the test
by Robert Louis Stevenson
Part 1
Mr. Utterson the lawyer was a man of a rugged countenance, that was never lighted by a smile; cold, scanty and embarrassed in discourse; backward in sentiment; lean, long, dusty, dreary, and yet somehow lovable. At friendly meetings, and when the wine was to his taste, something eminently human beaconed from his eye; something indeed which never found its way into his talk, but which spoke not only in these silent symbols of the after-dinner face, but more often and loudly in the acts of his life. He was austere with himself; drank gin when he was alone, to mortify a taste for vintages; and though he enjoyed the theatre, had not crossed the doors of one for twenty years. But he had an approved tolerance for others; sometimes wondering, almost with envy, at the high pressure of spirits involved in their misdeeds; and in any extremity inclined to help rather than to reprove.
"I incline to, Cain's heresy*," he used to say. "I let my brother go to the devil in his quaintly 'own way.'" In this character, it was frequently his fortune to be the last reputable acquaintance and the last good influence in the lives of down-going men. And to such as these, so long as they came about his chambers, he never marked a shade of change in his demeanour.
No doubt the feat was easy to Mr. Utterson; for he was undemonstrative at the best, and even his friendship seemed to be founded in a similar catholicity of good-nature. It is the mark of a modest man to accept his friendly circle ready-made from the hands of opportunity; and that was the lawyer's way. His friends were those of his own blood or those whom he had known the longest; his affections, like ivy, were the growth of time, they implied no aptness in the object. Hence, no doubt, the bond that united him to Mr. Richard Enfield, his distant kinsman, the well-known man about town. It was a nut to crack for many, what these two could see in each other, or what subject they could find in common. It was reported by those who encountered them in their Sunday walks, that they said nothing, looked singularly dull, and would hail with obvious relief the appearance of a friend. For all that, the two men put the greatest store by these excursions, counted them the chief jewel of each week, and not only set aside occasions of pleasure, but even resisted the calls of business, that they might enjoy them uninterrupted.
*The biblical story of Cain and Abel is a story about two brothers who gave offerings to God. Abel’s offering was accepted by God, but Cain’s was not. Jealous, Cain killed his brother. When God asked Cain where Abel was, Cain said, “Am I my brother’s keeper?” By saying this, Cain implied that what his brother did was his own business. (Genesis 4:1-16)
What may the mention of the Cain and Abel story in the quote in the second paragraph foreshadow?
That Mr. Utterson will be involved in violence
That Mr. Utterson and Mr. Enfield are actually brothers
That this will be a story about Mr. Utterson's sin and forgiveness
That Mr. Utterson and Mr. Enfield are two parts of a trinity of characters
Answer:
it's hard to tell without the answer choices but I would assume diction