Answer:
a. Firm 1
Explanation:
from the information, firm 1 has a higher transfer coefficient of 0.8 compared to that of the firm 2, so to reduce pollution concentration at a recepto site, the firm with the higher transfer coefficient will have to decrease its dumping, in this case firm 1 should reduce dumping.
Cost of cleaning up coal ash sites is $30 million today.
If the coal ash is not cleaned up
a. There is a 10% chance the coal ash ponds flood and causes $70 million dollars in damages.
b. There is a 20% chances the coal ash seeps into the ground water causing $100 million in damages.
c. There is a 70% chance the coal ash sites cause no damage to the state of North Carolina.
1. What is the expected benefit of cleaning up the coal ash site (i.e. how much do we expect to avoid in future damages)?
2. What sort of analysis would you undertake to advise the governor? Would you recommend the governor require Duke clean up the coal ash sites? (no need to complete calculation, just write the formula used for decision making)?
Answer:
1) expected benefits of cleaning up coal ash site is $27 million
2) The expected benefits of cleaning the site are less than the costs of cleaning them ($30 million cost > $27 million benefits). But the problem is that the cleaning costs will be covered by Duke Energy today, but in the future, there is a risk that the costs will be covered by the state government. Companies are not eternal and even industry leaders like Kodak, Sears, Toys R Us, Radio Shack, GM, etc., have gone bankrupt. The difference between the costs and the benefits is not that large to risk the state government having to pay for the cleaning costs in the future.
Explanation:
Costs of cleaning coal ash $30 million
Expected benefits form cleaning coal ash:
Answer:
EOQ = 359 units
Number of order placed = 7.2 times
Explanation:
The Economic Order Quantity (EOG) is the order size that minimizes the balance of ordering cost and holding cost. At the EOQ, the carrying cost is equal to the ordering cost.
It is computed using he formulae below
EOQ = √ (2× Co× D)/Ch
C0- 500, Ch- 20, D- 2,580
EOQ= √ (2× 500× 2580)/20
=359.16
EOQ = 359 units
Number of order place d per year = Annual demand / order size
Number of order placed = 2,580/ 359
= 7.2 times
Answer:
The basis for classifying assets as current or non-current is conversion to cash within
B. the operating cycle or one year, whichever is longer.
Explanation:
Assets are of two types, current assets, and non-current assets. Current assets are the assets which are placed on the list of the balance sheet of the company. Within one fiscal year, the current assets are expected to be converted into cash. On the other hand, non-current assets are the assets are long term asset of the company. They cannot be converted into cash in one fiscal year.
b. The lawyer should make a motion for additional discovery.
c. The lawyer should make a motion to amend the answer in order to make a motion to dismiss.
d. The lawyer should file a motion for judgment on the pleadings.
e. The lawyer should proceed to trial.
Answer:
Correct option is A.
The lawyer should make a motion for summary judgement
Explanation:
A movement for rundown judgement is Sled offer the disclosure procedure attesting that no truthful debates exist and that if the appointed authority applied the law to the undisputed realities, her solitary sensible choice would be agreeable to the moving party.
Answer:
$874
Explanation:
Calculation for Simon's additional Medicare tax
Based on the information given we were told Simon has a MAGI of the amount of $223,000 in which part of it is for wages income of the amount of $185,000 ($223,000 -$38,000)
while the amount of $38,000 is the net investment income which means that Samson MAGI is below the threshold limit of the amount of $200,000, therefore tax rate of 3.8% tax will be applied.
Now let calculate the additional Medicare tax
Additional Medicare tax = ($38,000-$15,000)*3.8%
Additional Medicare tax =$23,000*3.8%
Additional Medicare tax = $874
Therefore Simon's additional Medicare tax is:874
Simon's additional Medicare tax is $207. This is calculated by taking 0.9% of his income that exceeds the $200,000 threshold for single filers, which equals to $23,000 in Simon's case.
The student, Simon, needs to calculate his additional Medicare tax. As his MAGI, or Modified Adjusted Gross Income, is $223,000, he surpasses the threshold for single filers, which is $200,000. Therefore, the additional Medicare tax would apply to his income above this limit.
The Additional Medicare Tax is set at 0.9%, and it applies to the amount that exceeds the threshold. For Simon, this excess is $23,000 ($223,000 - $200,000). So, Simon's Additional Medicare Tax is 0.9% of $23,000, which calculates to $207.
In the context of Medicare taxes, it's important to remember that the tax rates are designed to increase as the income increases. Unlike the Social Security tax, there is no upper ceiling on the Medicare tax. The purpose of Medicare is to provide health care for the elderly.
#SPJ3