Answer:
The correct answer is B) Coercive or Intolerable Acts.
Explanation:
The Boston Tea Party refers to an event that took place on December 16, 1773. Members of a revolutionary group known as the Sons of Liberty boarded the British tea ships anchored at the Boston Harbor, and dumped their contents into the harbor. This was done to protest of the import of British tea into its American colonies, for which the colonies had to pay additional taxes. Colonists considered this act an abuse of power, as under the motto of "no taxation without representation", the British crown had no right to impose any new taxes unless it meant devolving some political power to the colonies. The British reacted to the Boston Tea Party by passing the Intolerable Acts (known as Coercive Acts in Britain) in 1774 to punish the colonists. These laws, among other things, put the colony of Massachusetts under direct British control, curtailed town meetings, allowed soldiers to be lodged in people's houses, and closed the port of Boston until the damage caused by the Tea Party was compensated. The Intolerable Acts were met with outrage not only by the people from Massachusetts, but by all the Thirteen Colonies, and this would become one of the causes that would eventually trigger the American Revolution a couple of years later.
In the space below, write one to two paragraphs analyzing the purpose of the Virginia Plan. Be sure to address the following:
How does the structure of the plan emphasize key ideas?
How does word choice and voice affect the document?
What is the purpose of the document, and do you think it successfully achieves this purpose? Why or why not?
Include quotes that support your analysis.
Cite your source.
It should be noted that the purpose of the Virginia plan was to propose a strong central government that was made up of three branches.
The Virginia Plan was drafted by James Madison and was presented by Edmund Randolph in May 1787. It was made up of 3 paragraphs and it proposed a strong government that was made up of the legislative, judicial, and executive was proposed.
It should be noted that the Virginia plan wasn't successful. It was rejected at the convention by the opposition from delegates. This was because it was believed that the smaller states would have less say in government.
Learn more about the Virgina plan on:
The two main compromises of the Constitutional Convention were the Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise.
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, resolved the debate of overrepresentation in the legislative branch.
It established a bicameral legislature with two houses that are the Senate, where each state would have equal representation, and the House of Representatives, where representation would be based on the state's population.
This compromise balanced the interests of both small and large states and ensured that both had a say in the legislative process.
The Three-Fifths Compromise addressed the contentious issue of how enslaved individuals would be counted for purposes of representation and taxation.
It determined that each enslaved person would be counted as three-fifths of a person when determining a state's population for these purposes.
This compromise disproportionately benefited states with large enslaved populations by giving them greater representation in the House of Representatives.
These compromises shaped the structure and functioning of the government.
The Great Compromise established a fair representation system that satisfied both small and large states, laying the foundation for the balance of power in Congress.
The Three-Fifths Compromise, although deeply flawed, had a significant impact on the distribution of political power by inflating the political influence of states with high numbers of enslaved individuals.
Thus, both compromises played a role in shaping the framework and dynamics of the newly formed government.
Learn more about the Great Compromise here:
#SPJ6
b. False