What was the name given to the British practice of taking American sailors from their ships and forcing them to serve in the British navy

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The name given to the British practice of taking American sailors from their ships and forcing them to serve in the British Navy is called impressment.
Answer 2
Answer: I believe its impressment

Related Questions

With respect to global connections, association with _______ offers the brightest immediate future for many African countries. A. India B. the United States. C. China D. the European Union.
3.Why, according to this report, did the U.S. economy change in the 1980s?
Which technology helps meteorologists predict the weather?GISGOESGPS
•identify and explain the causes of World War I•analyze the effect World War I had on U.S. social, economic, and foreign policy •describe American attitudes toward the conflict and analyze how the United States was drawn into a war that most Americans did not want
How do paragraphs 10-12 refine a key concept about space junk collisions?

The Proclamation of 1763 preventedA. colonists from settling west of the Appalachian Mountains.

B. the French from settling in Canada or the United States.

C. American Indians from settling south of New England.

D. the British from entering into the colonies without permission.

Answers

A) colonist from settling west of the Appalachian Mountains is correct.

By doing so, he hoped to placate Native Americans who had sided with against him during the recently concluded Seven Years' War. 

Population increases in cities caused many people to live in _____.Select the best choice from the answers provided.
mill towns
tenements
plantations
houses

Answers

TENEMENTS IS WHERE THEY LIVED I THINK

What are three forms of colonial resistance prior to the Revolutionary War

Answers

Answer:

The Stamp Act Congress issued a “Declaration of Rights and Grievances,” which, like the Virginia Resolves, declared allegiance to the King and “all due subordination” to Parliament, but also reasserted the idea that colonists were entitled to the same rights as native Britons. Those rights included trial by jury, which had been abridged by the Sugar Act, and the right to only be taxed by their own elected representatives. As Daniel Dulany wrote in 1765, “It is an essential principle of the English constitution, that the subject shall not be taxed without his consent.” Benjamin Franklin called it the “prime Maxim of all free Government.” Because the colonies did not elect members to Parliament, they believed that they were not represented and could not be taxed by that body. In response, Parliament and the Ministry argued that the colonists were “virtually represented,” just like the residents of those boroughs or counties in England that did not elect members to Parliament. However, the colonists rejected the notion of virtual representation, with one pamphleteer calling it a “monstrous idea.”

The second type of resistance to the Stamp Act was economic. While the Stamp Act Congress deliberated, merchants in major port cities were preparing non-importation agreements, hoping that their refusal to import British goods would lead British merchants to lobby for the repeal of the Stamp Act. The plan worked. As British exports to the colony dropped considerably, merchants did pressure Parliament to repeal.

The third, and perhaps, most crucial type of resistance was a popular protest. Violent riots broke out in Boston, during which crowds, led by the local Sons of Liberty, burned the appointed stamp collector for Massachusetts, Peter Oliver, in effigy and pulled a building he owned “down to the ground in five minutes.” Oliver resigned from the position of stamp collector the next day. A few days later a crowd also set upon the home of his brother-in-law, Lt. Gov. Thomas Hutchinson, who had publicly argued for submission to the stamp tax. Before the evening was over, much of Hutchinson’s home and belongings had been destroyed.

Popular violence and intimidation spread quickly throughout the colonies. In New York City, posted notices read: “PRO PATRIA, The first Man that either distributes or makes use of stamped paper, let him take care of his house, person and effects. Vox Populi. We dare.” By November 16, all of the original twelve stamp collectors had resigned, and by 1766, Sons of Liberty groups formed in most of the colonies to direct and organize further popular resistance. These tactics had the dual effect of sending a message to Parliament and discouraging colonists from accepting appointments as stamp collectors. With no one to distribute the stamps, the Act became unenforceable.

Explanation: Resistance took three forms, distinguished largely by class: legislative resistance by elites, economic resistance by merchants, and popular protest by common colonists. Colonial elites responded with legislative resistance initially by passing resolutions in their assemblies. The most famous of the anti-Stamp Act resolutions were the “Virginia Resolves” that declared that the colonists were entitled to “all the liberties, privileges, franchises, and immunities . . . possessed by the people of Great Britain.” When the resolves were printed throughout the colonies, however, they often included three extra, far more radical resolves not passed by the Virginia House of Burgesses, the last of which asserted that only “the general assembly of this colony have any right or power to impose or lay any taxation” and that anyone who argued differently “shall be deemed an enemy to this his majesty’s colony.” The spread of these extra resolves throughout the colonies helped radicalize the subsequent responses of other colonial assemblies and eventually led to the calling of the Stamp Act Congress in New York City in October 1765. Nine colonies sent delegates, including Benjamin Franklin, John Dickinson, Thomas Hutchinson, Philip Livingston, and James Otis.

Compare the goals of western feminists with the goals of women in Asia and Muslim countries. To what extent does culture shape the goals of feminist leaders?

Answers

Culture has a strong role and impact on determining the goals of feminist leaders. While in the western culture it was common for feminists to have goals of complete equality with males, this was not the case in Asian and Muslim countries where they have to fight for basic rights.

A country governed by a central party is best characterized as

Answers

Answer:

Communist, is the correct answer.

Explanation:

In social and political sciences, communism is an ideology consisted of political, philosophical, social and economic and movements with its main goal of establishing a communist society. A communist society is a socioeconomic system formulated upon the common possession of the methods of production.  A nation governed by a central party is adequately identified as Communist. China, North Korea and Cuba, are some of the examples of Communist countries.

It is also characterized as a communist 

Mercantalism is the basic economic and political theory by which 17th and 18th century European powers governed their overseas colonies. the basic premise being that an empire had to export more than it imported thus having a____________.

Answers

Answer:

surplus in the trade balance

Explanation:

Mercantilism not only stated that there should be a greater export of goods than imports, these goods had to have an additional added value. The import of raw material such as wood, minerals and agricultural products was of great importance with the idea that artisans through specialized work added value to these goods and exported with the objective of generating wealth for the state.

It is important to highlight that mercantilism dictated that precious metals such as gold should not be exported, with the aim of strengthening the state and having a strong fiscal policy.